Raiden
Wakanda Forever
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2002
- Messages
- 30,004
- Reaction score
- 498
- Points
- 48
Seahawks
![]()
I don't remember neon green being one of Seahawk's team colors.

Seahawks
![]()

I'm guessing you don't remember these.I don't remember neon green being one of Seahawk's team colors.![]()

I'm guessing you don't remember these.
![]()
The new uniforms are nowhere near as bad as these![]()

Rumored new Panthers helmet. Looks pretty tight![]()
Thats a shame. I really dug this helmet. Thought it fit them very well.Also, it would appear this helmet is a mock up and won't be happening.
I have to say I was hoping for the Redskins to change their unis up at least a little. It's not that they look bad I just would like to see them change things up a little.
With much hullabaloo, Nike introduced their new uniforms for the NFL's 32 teams. Along with new technology, nearly every uniform got a facelift, from the Seattle Seahawks complete overhaul to the subtle size change of the GSH on the Chicago Bears' uniforms. However, the Green Bay Packers said thanks, but no thanks to Nike's uniform updates.
[Photos: See the new NFL uniforms]
The Packers changed nothing about their classic, green and gold look. They also will not use the fabric that is reportedly lighter, particularly when wet. When Nike described the Pack's uniforms, they put it quite simply:
"The Green Bay Packers have chosen to stay with their traditional design aesthetic as well as their former uniform fabrication for the coming season."Would you expect anything less of a team who is so rooted in the NFL's history? This is the team of Curly Lambeau and Vince Lombardi and the first Super Bowls. The Packers have kept their uniform essentially the same for 50 years. Bart Starr, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers didn't need the fancy technology to win Super Bowls in the past. Why would they need it now?
The Philadelphia Eagles also kept their uniforms the same. These teams turning down every one of Nike's changes is also refreshing to anyone who was worried that Nike would take over some of the classic looks of the NFL. Though the Packers mentioned they are open to changes in the future, it still showed that the teams are in charge.

Not changing the design I get, but keeping the same old material seems kind of silly. Maybe they should go back to wearing 1960's helmets and cleats while they're at it.
Once again the Packers "holier-than-thou" attitude shining through.![]()

Not changing the design I get, but keeping the same old material seems kind of silly. Maybe they should go back to wearing 1960's helmets and cleats while they're at it.
Once again the Packers "holier-than-thou" attitude shining through.![]()
I don't get why them and a handful of other teams didn't want the latest in uniform technology while retaining their classic look. Seems like being stuck in the past just for the sake of doing it.Not changing the design I get, but keeping the same old material seems kind of silly. Maybe they should go back to wearing 1960's helmets and cleats while they're at it.
Once again the Packers "holier-than-thou" attitude shining through.![]()
I don't get why them and a handful of other teams didn't want the latest in uniform technology while retaining their classic look. Seems like being stuck in the past just for the sake of doing it.
Speaking of uniforms...when are NFL players going to have the state-of-the-art threads like SuperPro?
![]()
![]()
Superpro needs that straight cash homieThat issue where Superpro held out for a bigger contract was saddening.
t:That issue where Superpro held out for a bigger contract was saddening.
Superpro needs that straight cash homiet: