What source has stated a $300 million production budget plus $175 million more in advertising?
The sources that I've seen have stated $220 million for production and $100 million for advertising.
CBS Minnetsota Movie Blog
Box Office Mojo
LA Times
The sources above and more are pretty consistent on $220 million.
$1.5 billion x 0.5 = $750 million, assuming theaters take half (I've actually read that the studio usually retains about 55%, in which case this jumps up to $825 million)
$750 million - $50 million = $700 million, after Downey's reported cut of the box office
$700 million - $320 million = $380 million minus the budget and advertising
$380 million - $1 million = $379 million after paying Evans, Hemsworth, Johansson, Ruffalo, and Renner (should I even count this separately from the budget?)
Marvel made out pretty damn good.
I agree that signed contracts should be binding, but that doesn't mean that Marvel's not being cheap with the actors.
Marvel Studios hasn't been cheap
overall, with the $150-200 million budgets each movie has received.
However, they seem set on squeezing out the actors and minimizing their pay relative to what they could get anywhere else, working on smaller films. $200,000 is what you'd expect for a disposable D-List nobody in a supporting role, not what a lead actor in a blockbuster film would get paid.
Basically, the clear message is that Marvel doesn't value the actors as much as other major studios, and considers them all expendable.
Again, contracts should be binding. If someone signs on for a low amount, then I agree that if it comes down to it they should work for that amount.
However, I don't think any of us here are legal experts, or privy to all of the stipulations.
According to one site, Evans and Hemsworth both signed a six-picture deal. According to the recent article, Evans only recently signed on for Winter Soldier and Avengers 2, while Hemsworth is currently unsigned.
Who's right here, and who's BSing? Both cite unnamed sources, though the recent article attributes many of the quotes to the actors' agents.
Somebody a couple pages back in this thread stated that Hemsworth's contract had a "baseline" for Thor and Avengers, with options for further movies that were set to be renegotiated when the time came.
That to me is a very interesting point which I would like to see confirmed with a source.
It makes sense, doesn't it? Why would someone like Evans or Johansson, who had been working in major Hollywood films for years, sign on for a mere $200,000 with no expectations of renegotiating in the future? I would think that they, or at the very least their agents, would be far smarter and more assertive than that.
If it's true that the contracts (which again, none of us have seen) did leave the door open for renegotiations, then there is nothing wrong with these actors wanting more money.
Again, that's something I'm curious to see confirmed or disproven, if possible.