• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Age of Ultron The Avengers 2! The Official News and Speculation Thread - - - - Part 39

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't get over Vision looking like a faded purple. That's why I've tried to make his colors more vibrant when I do wallpapers.
Do you not like the tone of colour they went with for Vision? I guess it's not as bold as the others in that poster (who look good in bold colours) but I think it works well for Vision.
 
He just seems so plain. Like he's been washed in bleach
 
Haha, he does seem a bit watered down or washed out but I like the look.
 
Makes me wonder if that's because Jarvis is being controlled tho? You know almost doing thing that make him fell bad.
I can see Vision/Jarvis once he breaks free of Ultron, becoming more colorful
 
Possibly, although the purple version might be the more colourful version and the one under Ultron's control even more washed out (white almost...;)).
 
I came here to see if anyone had posted this as well. Hate it won't be Garfield, but I know marvel will get it right!
 
Has anyone posted this already?
It's official!

Sony Pictures Entertainment Brings Marvel Studios Into The Amazing World Of Spider-Man

New Spider-Man Will Appear First in an Upcoming Marvel Film Within Marvel’s Cinematic Universe


http://marvel.com/news/movies/24062..._studios_into_the_amazing_world_of_spider-man

WELCOME SPIDEY, took ya long enough.
psvhz.jpg

So July 28, 2017 a New Spidey comes in
 
Very hesitant about this - what with Sony maintaining creative control over solo movies, but very glad it's starting from scratch as well - the latest franchise feels so messy with a universe so small, like everything coming from Oscorp, that it's best to pick themselves up by their bootstraps and move forward. I still maintain they shoulda let Sony bleed till they got the rights back but I guess Feige & co. thought having Spidey in the IW movie was too good to pass up. What would I know, though? They're the multi-billion dollar business superstars.

Guess this also means Goddard's jump from Daredevil to Sinister Six was an unfortunate move.
 
Last edited:
Does this mean Spider-Man is in Civil War?

"Under the deal, the new Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film from Marvel's Cinematic Universe (MCU). Sony Pictures will thereafter release the next installment of its $4 billion Spider-Man franchise, on July 28, 2017."

I took this to mean he shows up in a film, and then has his solo film. The only film that would make sense is Civil War...Also the solo film is scheduled for the same day as Thor, so I'll assume one of those will move.
 
Sony still has full creative control for Spidey plus we have to wait longer for Black Panther and Captian Marvel? That is terrible news.
 
Spidey... Welcome to the Age of Ultron.



or Civil War. Whenever you feel like it.
 
Marvel needs to put a movie in November 2016. Bump something up. It's going to be a long wait from DOCTOR STRANGE to GUARDIANS 2, kinda like what we're dealing with right now.

Also, IW2 really should end Phase 3 so maybe INHUMANS should technically start Phase 4. Perfect to make that Phase mainly about INHUMANS and maybe Namor and GUARDIANS 3 and more Spidey to go with the hoped return of the Fantastic Four. The First Family blends in nicely with those four properties.
 
Marvel needs to put a movie in November 2016. Bump something up. It's going to be a long wait from DOCTOR STRANGE to GUARDIANS 2, kinda like what we're dealing with right now.

Also, IW2 really should end Phase 3 so maybe INHUMANS should technically start Phase 4. Perfect to make that Phase mainly about INHUMANS and maybe Namor and GUARDIANS 3 and more Spidey to go with the hoped return of the Fantastic Four. The First Family blends in nicely with those four properties.

Disney has their big animated film Moana coming out in November 2016.
 
Sony still has full creative control for Spidey plus we have to wait longer for Black Panther and Captian Marvel? That is terrible news.

The way i see it is Sony will retain final control and ownership of the character, but it's clear they're letting Feige and Marvel lead the way creatively. Like Darth said in another thread, its called saving face. Feige and Disney have Sony by their balls.
 
Hmm..so Thor will be the lead in to the Avengers IW part 1. I always thought that made more sense.

Interesting that Black Panther will be in between IW part 1 and 2. I wonder how that will be pulled off with the universal crisis going on.

I really hope that Spider-Man doesnt ruin the overall plan that Feige had. If that is the case I say he would be better off with Sony doing the villain spin-offs. I would hate to see all of this continuity go to waste. I believe in Marvel and Feige so until I see them screw up i'm on their side.

BP does seem out of place with Captain Marvel and Inhumans. Then again, TWS had a distinctly different feel to it than IM3 or TDW and GotG. It can work, fingers crossed.

My full thoughts on the Spidey MCU news:
http://otlnews.net/2015/02/09/official-spider-man-is-back-at-marvel-studios/
 
so Black Panther solo flick takes place after Infinity War Part 1

Marvel is probably scrambling right now editing Civil War as well as deciding who is on Infinity War Part 1 and 2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"