With Brett Ratner or McG at the helm? It would've further set back the character on the big screen...The SR discussion has got me wondering what the state of Superman on film would be if Superman: Flyby had been made back in the day?
If I'm not mistaken, Routh and Cavill both auditioned for it. I'm imagining how different each of their legacies would be now if that movie had been made and was successful, with one of them playing Supes.
There's that, too. I knew they fixed some stuff in the later drafts, but that project wasn't meant to be and I'm glad it didn't happen.That first draft of Flyby was ridiculous. Destruction porn that would've made Zack Snyder's MOS seem tame by comparison. Lex Luthor being a government agent who is later revealed to be Kryptonian. Just an absolute mess.
JJ's Superman movie would of been their Iron Man.
I have my issues with JJ but I'd be 110% more positive about the DCU if JJ were running it instead of Gunn. Particularly because there would be a much higher chance of Reeves being open to being part of something run by his buddy.JJ's Superman movie would of been their Iron Man.
I'm his #1 fan. So good.Would that have been a good thing or a bad thing in your opinion?
Ehhhhhh… we’re getting a fair amount of Reeves/DC collaboration as it is, but I really doubt that his entire vision of The Batman as a stand-alone would change just for JJ.I have my issues with JJ but I'd be 110% more positive about the DCU if JJ were running it instead of Gunn. Particularly because there would be a much higher chance of Reeves being open to being part of something run by his buddy.
So Batman The Caped Crusader was nothing?JJ was given a half a billion dollar contract and he produced nothing. He had his shot and did nothing with it. I wouldn't trust him to manage an entire brand.
Character posters?I'm guessing we'll get a new photo of David as Superman for tomorrow (Superman Day).
You like mystery boxes and people running for no reason that much?I have my issues with JJ but I'd be 110% more positive about the DCU if JJ were running it instead of Gunn. Particularly because there would be a much higher chance of Reeves being open to being part of something run by his buddy.
Yes, JJ has no history of doing anything. No reviving of multiple franchises and making studios insane amounts of money. Never happened. Not once!JJ was given a half a billion dollar contract and he produced nothing. He had his shot and did nothing with it. I wouldn't trust him to manage an entire brand.
Complain about him all you want. But there is anything his movies have, it's heart.You like mystery boxes and people running for no reason that much?
JJ is so ridiculously overrated it's funny. His films lack any sense of depth or heart and the action is just...blah.
And i want Reeves nowhere near as shared universe.
A ripoff of what? Star Wars? It's a Star Wars movie.His Star Trek is dreck...and his first Star Wars film was such a ripoff it is almost cliche.

I don't think so. Even with JJ writing the script, they never had the right directors attached to it.JJ's Superman movie would of been their Iron Man.
Complain about him all you want. But there is anything his movies have, it's heart.
And yeah, he's terrible at action.