- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 70,590
- Reaction score
- 39,968
- Points
- 118
It's how Jonathan was conceived.Ugh. He probably has Kryptonite for that. I don't know, @Herolee10.

It's how Jonathan was conceived.Ugh. He probably has Kryptonite for that. I don't know, @Herolee10.
Turns out there are no immediate plans for Jon in the DCU. Gunn was so taken with Jordan from Superman and Lois that he decided to use him instead and ignore Jon altogether.It's how Jonathan was conceived.![]()
Turns out there are no immediate plans for Jon in the DCU. Gunn was so taken with Jordan from Superman and Lois that he decided to use him instead and ignore Jon altogether.
Oh, I forgot to mention that they're using the same actor as well.![]()
I'm going to tell you what I told Renee Zelweger in front of Big Tex in the Texas State Fair. You should have killed me when you had the chance.
Sorry that you didn’t enjoy MI III.I found the story to be laughable (even for an MI film) the villain to be a waste of a great actor, the ending atrocious and it looked and felt more like a TV show than a movie. To me it felt like a lot of things JJ does...it has the look of the project it is aping but none of the substance.
Since Metamorpho is in this movie, maybe she's beating the **** out of Simon Stagg?
If true, Ticket, SOLD!Since Metamorpho is in this movie, maybe she's beating the **** out of Simon Stagg?
Reddit also threw out Lex in a wig.Since Metamorpho is in this movie, maybe she's beating the **** out of Simon Stagg?
Reddit also threw out Lex in a wig.![]()
That was the first thing that I thought of when I saw the picture, since Metamorpho and Stagg Industries are in this film.Since Metamorpho is in this movie, maybe she's beating the **** out of Simon Stagg?
The difference is that you have a practical example of how the real material folds and moves and the light shines on it in a given scenario , and so you can either extend that or superimpose a complete CGI cape, but which has a real basis to rely on. It helps the VFX artists.View attachment 130462
This is neither here nor there, but I find it interesting how nowadays, seen both here and in the Supergirl set pics, they're doing this thing of leaving a tiny upper part of the cape for CGI-heavy shots, when back in the filming of Man of Steel and BVS they would remove the cape completely and add the whole thing in post. I'd be interested in hearing a visual effects pro explain the difference.
Yeah, but they have software that replicates movement and lighting very seamlessly, which they're using for the rest of the object. I don't know if the average layperson would guess there's no real cape in these Superman shots if it weren't for the BTS material.The difference is that you have a practical example of how the real material folds and moves and the light shines on it in a given scenario , and so you can either extend that or superimpose a complete CGI cape, but which has a real basis to rely on. It helps the VFX artists.
Yeah, but they have software that replicates movement and lighting very seamlessly, which they're using for the rest of the object. I don't know if the average layperson would guess there's no real cape in these Superman shots if it weren't for the BTS material.
Plus, the movement of a shorter cape might not account for the weight and resulting flow of the full thing. They'd have to slow it down, maybe? Dunno. It's just mildly interesting.