to be tickled by Rachel Brosnahan while arm wrestling Isabela Merced...
I thought X rated stuff wasn't allowed in here......to be tickled by Rachel Brosnahan while arm wrestling Isabela Merced...
to be tickled by Rachel Brosnahan while arm wrestling Isabela Merced...
On the subject of Batman and Superman's dynamic (in the comics), James recently said that he loved how they were different in some respects but similar in others. So, I wouldn't be too concerned about getting anything even remotely close to what we saw in BvS.
There's actually a really cool panel from Tom King's Batman run that perfectly encapsulates what I'd expect to see from their relationship in the DCU.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I understand why people may be turned off by these extreme shots, but it actually makes sense why they do this for 2 specific reasons. The first being that comics artists exaggerate perspectives and use foreshortening all the time.
View attachment 138007View attachment 138008
The second reason being that distorting the perspective on film gives the shot an added sense of intensity and chaos. Note how the shots with exaggerated perspective are always of someone going at extreme speeds. It's definitely a stylistic choice, but I actually dig it. In fact, MCU could learn a lil' something from this style especially when showcasing Mr. Fantastic's powers.
I think the biggest difference is that Barbie and Oppenheimer were very different movies (bright/poppy fantasy/comedy VS historical drama), whereas Superman and FF might get lumped into the same category (superhero). There's an abundance of dollars available, but people might elect to see one instead of the other, VS Barbenheimer which might have had more overlapping business.Is social media that desperate for clicks that it has to make up a Superman vs F4 battle when there is plenty of room for both to make money in the summer. To me if Barbie and Oppenheimer can combine and make over 2 billion dollars, then Superman and F4 can possibly do the same. The movies are separated by two weeks. I for one will support both movies. I will be spending my 4th of July watching Jurassic Rebirth too.
Of course they are doing that...you knew they would it is not out of desperation it is because they are competition for each other. They have done this with every DC and Marvel film that come out near each other. This is nothing like Barbie and Oppenheimer which were not the same audience at all.Is social media that desperate for clicks that it has to make up a Superman vs F4 battle when there is plenty of room for both to make money in the summer. To me if Barbie and Oppenheimer can combine and make over 2 billion dollars, then Superman and F4 can possibly do the same. The movies are separated by two weeks. I for one will support both movies. I will be spending my 4th of July watching Jurassic Rebirth too.
Well supposedly Jurassic Rebirth is tracking at $100 million for the Fourth of July weekend, Superman has the presales lead for Fandango tickets in 2025, and Fantastic 4 is tracking for $125 million opening weekend. I think there is a chance they will together sell the most tickets in the history of July. Plenty of money to go around. Does not have to be a winner or a loser. Personally I am tired of studios being afraid to put movies out because of Marvel and Star Wars. We need more than one good movie a month. Especially in the summer.I think the biggest difference is that Barbie and Oppenheimer were very different movies (bright/poppy fantasy/comedy VS historical drama), whereas Superman and FF might get lumped into the same category (superhero). There's an abundance of dollars available, but people might elect to see one instead of the other, VS Barbenheimer which might have had more overlapping business.
If I HAD to choose, it would 100% be superman, but thankfully I don't have to choose, and I will be seeing both.I think the biggest difference is that Barbie and Oppenheimer were very different movies (bright/poppy fantasy/comedy VS historical drama), whereas Superman and FF might get lumped into the same category (superhero). There's an abundance of dollars available, but people might elect to see one instead of the other, VS Barbenheimer which might have had more overlapping business.
Man of Steel to me is the best Superman movie in live action. I thought Krypton would have been interesting if they explored it more. I liked Zod’s motives. Still believe he was the best villain in the DCEU. I will probably watch it this weekend. Diane Lane and Kevin Costner did it for me as the Kents. I know people hated the Kents for the way they raised Clark but I think that was realistic in a small town. It is gonna be tough for Gunn to match the action of the battle for Smallville. To me one of best action sequences I have ever seen on the big screen.
300 was Snyder’s best movie but battle scenes and action, Man of Steel was it….for real, i honestly don't think any other action sequence from the rest of snyder's filmography has surpassed the battle for smallville.
dood directed that part so well, he couldn't one up himself ever again haha.
Zod is probably still in the phantom zone in the DCU. Like Darksied he will probably be sidelined because of the DCEU.I wonder if this Superman already fought Zod. Most likely, yes. But still kinda cool if we get any sorta reference to that. Kinda how Battinson already has history with Joker etc.
Yeah, I wasn’t built to avoid trailers either.It is no exaggeration to say that I have never done this in my life, but applaud y'all who have the willpower.![]()