- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 72,271
- Reaction score
- 42,904
- Points
- 203
So is Kang then going around the multiverse planting Doom's everywhere? That's what I always wanted in my Doctor Doom lore
In the alleged leakKang plants a Doom baby in the 616 to ensure his own birth thousands of years later. Kang is a descendant of Doom's. The fact that the baby grows up to be a hero in being raised by the Starks, introduces the concept of nature vs. nurture to Doom's arc. If he's raised by good people, in good conditions, he becomes Earth's mightiest hero. If he's allowed to grow up in Latveria however, under harsh conditions, he becomes Earth's greatest threat. They're proposing the idea that a Doom is either the best of us (616 Tony) or the worst of us (God Emperor of Battleworld).
Based on what?RDJ says he's not playing a Stark variant. That suggests 616 Tony is a Doom variant.
You have to establish what the intended destiny (nature) was before you can explore the effects of the conditions respective to each universe (nurture).You get the nature/nurture concept just by having two versions of the same person live completely different lives in separate universes.
And you avoid the narrative clunk of swapping babies 'cause Kang or something.
It's a comic book movie, brah. ****'s not that deep.You have to establish what the intended destiny (nature) was before you can explore the effects of the conditions respective to each universe (nurture).
If in a parallel universe, Ted Bundy doesn't become a serial killer but is rather known as "Charles Connors" and becomes POTUS, he's still Ted Bundy physiologically. A Ted Bundy, who by being adopted by The Connors family, somehow avoided whatever it was that made him become a serial killer in our universe.
No, it says these characters just have the same face, like other random characters in the MCU do. We already know the same character can have different faces. There was a whole Spider-Man movie about it.RDJ says he's not playing a Stark variant. That suggests 616 Tony is a Doom variant.
Logan was Nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay lol Black Panther was Nominated for Best Picture. As was Joker.It's a comic book movie, brah. ****'s not that deep.
Would explain the use of the title Darth, as a personal affront to me.What if Darth Fantastic is a variant of Marvel_United?
Sure, but your concept isn't Logan. It's more like General HospitalLogan was Nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay lol Black Panther was Nominated for Best Picture. As was Joker.
CBMs can be well written and explore deeply profound themes.
And it sounds like this "theory going around" would be neither.CBMs can be well written and explore deeply profound themes.
They can be. What you are suggesting is for them to write it like Catwoman.Logan was Nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay lol Black Panther was Nominated for Best Picture. As was Joker.
CBMs can be well written and explore deeply profound themes.
You're not getting this here.Logan was Nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay lol Black Panther was Nominated for Best Picture. As was Joker.
CBMs can be well written and explore deeply profound themes.
And then there is comic book television. Being as deep as the ocean...It's a comic book movie, brah. ****'s not that deep.
I'm not expecting Doomsday or Secret Wars to get Oscars, but I am confident that McFeely and the Russos will deliver great films. The Winter Soldier is still my fav MCU film with Endgame, Infinity War and Civil War right behind it.You're not getting this here.
You do you, fam. I just wouldn't marry myself to an idea that is, frankly put, more complicated than it needs to be.I'm not expecting Doomsday or Secret Wars to get Oscars, but I am confident that McFeely and the Russos will deliver great films. The Winter Soldier is still my fav MCU film with Endgame, Infinity War and Civil War right behind it.
I have faith in this crew. Specially with RDJ as the villain of the piece.
I think the implication is thatdoesn't that kinda create a grandfather paradox of sorts, tho
yes, it'd put his ancestor in this new universe, but, with a different upbringing whats to ensure he ends up with the same partners in the future or whatever and so on and so forth through the generations that made him who he is...
I'm pretty sure you can state the implication with complete confidence given it seems to be your own theory.I think the implication is thatKang knows everything. So much so that he knows that unless he plants that Doom baby in the 616, he will not be born in the distant future.
Its absolutely a paradox. Kang and Doom have always had that relationship where one won't kill the other because they're not sure who's the ancestor and who's the descendant. The same applies to Reed and Kang. Its a three-way paradox lol
It's not. Came across it on Reddit a few weeks ago.I'm pretty sure you can state the implication with complete confidence given it seems to be your own theory.
Then go find it all we can see this "leak" as wellIt's not. Came across it on Reddit a few weeks ago.
Given he liked your post but didn't post it, it's his theory.You're not making a good first impression around here, friend. Either post the link of this supposed leak, or admit that it's your theory.
No.Given he liked your post but didn't post it, it's his theory.
So then where is it?