Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]523513[/split]
How is everything not great?I don't think Feige and Marvel Studios is a very relevant comparison overall, because the whole thing was such an underdog and upstart venture to begin with.
It could have failed, and then the whole thing would have gone under. But, by the time Age of Ultron rolled around, the MCU experiment had already succeeded so far beyond anyone's original expectations that a somewhat under-whelming Avengers sequel hardly mattered.
The MCU started with nothing and built itself into one of the most successful franchises worldwide.
Star Wars is not an upstart or an underdog. It is probably the biggest pop culture franchise in North America. Internationally, it is more of a mixed bag, though Star Wars certainly does very well in a lot of places.
So this franchise needs to be evaluated with that in mind. There is a whole spectrum of possible reactions in between "Fire everyone!" and "Everything is great!"
I think this movie won't justify either of those reactions. At the box office, it is probably going to be perceived as a little disappointing, but not overly so, depending on where the movie ends up, exactly.
But there are other factors to consider, such as the long-term strategy. So, we'll see. It's an interesting case.
How is everything not great?![]()
I think this film is certain to outdo R1, but the question is will this outdo TFA? I think it will land somewhere in between.
How is everything not great?![]()
I don't think Bob Iger or any analyst in their right mind expected a repeat of 2 billion +. There is historical precedence for the first film in a Star Wars trilogy to be the biggest earner, and there is simply no accounting for the lightning in a bottle aspect of the return of the OT characters after 30 years. "Chewie, we're home" sold all those tickets.
If this flatlines around 1.1 billion, sure, that could be considered a bit of an underperformance. But I still think it has a pretty clear shot at 1.4 or higher.
As with any other franchise, they are looking to maximize its potential in the long term.
Star Wars has a very high potential.
So of course they are going to look at these results with a very critical eye.
Not doing so would be foolish, which they are not. As to what their assessment will be exactly, we will have to wait and see.
Among other things, Marvel Studios has been very good at assessing what works and what doesn't, and changing up the formula when appropriate. Ragnarok is a great recent example of that.
How is everything not great?![]()
Totally agree. There was NO chance of it getting to TFA numbers. None. As Darth pointed out ESB didn't do ANH numbers. I expect 7-9 to function similarly (relatively speaking) to 4-6, but 1.4B+ is a very big number (if TLJ hits it). Not impossible for a SW movie, but still a high bar.
Would the producers like more? Sure, but a showing like that isn't going to deep six a franchise.
It will be interesting to see how this film effects the next ones box office.
People were always gonna see this one. Personally I can see the next one struggling. Rogue one numbers. Will be interesting to watch it unfold.
Basically nothing would deep six Star Wars. It is too well-established. Even in the case of a huge failure, there would be every reason to try again. So that argument is either absurd or a straw man (frequently a straw man).
But "Everything is great!," "We are incredibly happy with these results!," that type of thing is mostly just a PR stance, which some fans get caught up in, or adopt, because they are rooting for something, one way or another.
In some cases, results are so obviously great or terrible that it is easy to assess.
But, in a borderline case like this, we won't really know for a while what the assessment was. Or whether that assessment was accurate.
It matters in the sense that it will affect future movies. I'm not really sure how it will play out.
I don't think the domestic figures will be much of a concern, simply because Star Wars has so much established interest in the US. Internationally, they would probably like better results in certain places.
I don't think Bob Iger or any analyst in their right mind expected a repeat of 2 billion +. There is historical precedence for the first film in a Star Wars trilogy to be the biggest earner, and there is simply no accounting for the lightning in a bottle aspect of the return of the OT characters after 30 years. "Chewie, we're home" sold all those tickets.
If this flatlines around 1.1 billion, sure, that could be considered a bit of an underperformance. But I still think it has a pretty clear shot at 1.4 or higher.
If heads roll as a result of your movie making a big profit then I definitely wouldn't want to work for Disney.Shadow Moses said:Forbes are really going out of their way to defend this movie. Doesn't matter how they report this story. If the movie ends up like 1.2b (800m+ less than TFA) heads will roll at Disney.
Yeah like 2 billion or DECAPITATION CITY!If heads roll as a result of your movie making a big profit then I definitely wouldn't want to work for Disney.![]()
Rogue One numbers, a billion dollars, how is that struggling?It will be interesting to see how this film effects the next ones box office.
People were always gonna see this one. Personally I can see the next one struggling. Rogue one numbers. Will be interesting to watch it unfold.
International update:
As it gets closer to the $1B worldwide mark, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has now shot well past $900M with $934.2M including Thursdays grosses. The international box office portion was $22.7M for $469.6M to date. The $500M offshore threshold is approaching this weekend as is that $1B global milestone. Together, the three Star Wars titles since Disney acquired Lucasfilm have now topped $4B worldwide with $4.058B through yesterday.
http://deadline.com/2017/12/star-wa...-results-international-box-office-1202232602/
Rogue One numbers, a billion dollars, how is that struggling?
They already paid off their cost for Star Wars, which was rather cheap, and half paid in stocks.By any other standard $500 mil domestic box office and similar international in 3 weeks would be huge. But no other franchise has set a $2.1 bil global bar either. And no other franchise saw anything like the $4.1 bil acquisition cost either. My background is financial analysis. Disney's corporate operating margin is around 15%. So for SW to make that margin on their initial investment would require about $600 mil profit per year. And that ignores the 3 years with very little revenue before the release of TFA.
Now TFA was a huge winner. The movie alone was worth $750-800 mil in profit to Disney and merchandise was probably another $450-500 mil. If TLJ does $1.4 bil globally, Disney's split should be 55-60% of gross (TFA was 50-55%). That's $770-840 mil revenue to Disney. I've seen production and marketing estimates anywhere from $420 mil to $550 mil. So $300-350 mil profit on the movie sounds about right.