From AintitCool News, its prolly just a rumor but still interesting. Not sure if anyone posted this yet
Is Warner Bros. Prepping A Movie-Length SMALLVILLE-Related Project Called METROPOLIS??
I am Hercules!!
If this is hoax, its a good one, as it comes with a few bits of convincing detail we are not sharing with you.
Someone has written us, claiming to have gotten a glimpse of some signage being prepared for next months Smallville presentation at Comic-Con. His or her description:
On black, with crimson/red text in the same font lettering that Smallville uses, and a transparent grey Superman "S" watermark behind the text:
METROPOLIS
CHRISTMAS 2010
Then at the bottom is a banner advertising the Smallville presentation, with the time/place (can't remember).
Other info this untested source sent us suggests "Metropolis" is a movie-length project, and not a new series.
Word is Smallville will conclude its 9-year run May 2010, so it makes sense that the CW would tack on a couple more production hours up there in Canada to make a Superman TV-movie that would run seven or so months after the series conclusion.
But what if Tom Welling isn't putting on the red cape for the small screen? It doesnt seem like 18 months is enough time to slap together a big-screen "Smallville" sequel, but I also seem to remember Warner Bros. kicking the first three episodes of Clone Wars to cinemas without a lot of notice.
This comes from an untested source, self-described as Yodas *****, so kindly take it all as rumor.

No way in Hell, they're going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to make Smallville: the Movie. Never gonna happen.
On the other hand, a spin-off or tv movie that wraps up the series is certainly within the realm of reality.
From AintitCool News, its prolly just a rumor but still interesting. Not sure if anyone posted this yet
Is Warner Bros. Prepping A Movie-Length SMALLVILLE-Related Project Called METROPOLIS??
I am Hercules!!
If this is hoax, its a good one, as it comes with a few bits of convincing detail we are not sharing with you.
Someone has written us, claiming to have gotten a glimpse of some signage being prepared for next months Smallville presentation at Comic-Con. His or her description:
On black, with crimson/red text in the same font lettering that Smallville uses, and a transparent grey Superman "S" watermark behind the text:
METROPOLIS
CHRISTMAS 2010
Then at the bottom is a banner advertising the Smallville presentation, with the time/place (can't remember).
Other info this untested source sent us suggests "Metropolis" is a movie-length project, and not a new series.
Word is Smallville will conclude its 9-year run May 2010, so it makes sense that the CW would tack on a couple more production hours up there in Canada to make a Superman TV-movie that would run seven or so months after the series conclusion.
But what if Tom Welling isn't putting on the red cape for the small screen? It doesnt seem like 18 months is enough time to slap together a big-screen "Smallville" sequel, but I also seem to remember Warner Bros. kicking the first three episodes of Clone Wars to cinemas without a lot of notice.
This comes from an untested source, self-described as Yodas *****, so kindly take it all as rumor.
Wasn't season 8 one of their highest rated seasons?? I mean the majority of season 8 was awesome
To be fair, This is speaking of a made for TV movie. This doesn't seem to pertain to a theater released feature.
I think, when you look at other CG heavy movies, SR does make you wonder:
SR: $209 million budget
Transformers: $151 million
Transformers 2: $200 million
Terminator 2: $160 million (inflation adjusted)
Lord of the Ring: Two Towers: $95 million
Either Singer got ripped off, or he spent a lot of money that didn't come across on the screen!

Studios always lie about how much they spent to make a film. Seriously.![]()
t: Let's say SR did cost $200 mill though, it didn't seem like it. I suppose all of this is conjecture though if they all lie.If WB was going to take notes from Smallville into the film-franchise, it would have already happened years ago at the series' peak.
Studios always lie about how much they spent to make a film. Seriously.![]()
who are u to tell me what i can and cannot question?Well, it's all we've got to go off, so I'm taking it as gospel until someone says otherwiset: Let's say SR did cost $200 mill though, it didn't seem like it. I suppose all of this is conjecture though if they all lie.
I was implying that it could be the other way around. Any ideas they have for the theatrical movie, they could hint at in the Smallville TV Movie to see how popular they are. They could then run with and develop the successful ideas for the big budget movie.
lol why would WB lie that they spent a crap load of money on a ****** moviewho are u to tell me what i can and cannot question?
and i have no clue why they moved smallville to friday, thats something Fox only does.
I know, Henry Cavill is Superman, but what about him as ZOD?
I think, when you look at other CG heavy movies, SR does make you wonder:
SR: $209 million budget
Transformers: $151 million
Transformers 2: $200 million
Terminator 2: $160 million (inflation adjusted)
Lord of the Ring: Two Towers: $95 million
Either Singer got ripped off, or he spent a lot of money that didn't come across on the screen!