I watched the trilogy again this weekend, and I feel that it's gotten better over time. We've seen many super hero films/franchises age poorly, sometimes
really poorly, so I'm grateful that Spidey has a solid representation on film. Here are a few observations and memories about it.
SM1- I remember a cheer going through the crowd when Spider-man dropped down from the ceiling as he chased Dennis Carradine through the warehouse. That moment hasn't lost its power. I also remember loving the final battle between Norman and Peter for how personal it was. That was replayed in the fight between Peter and Harry in SM3, and I appreciate the symmetry of it all.
I still contend that the difference in quality between SM1 and SM2 is razor thin. Many of the criticisms that I heard at the time (Mary Jane lacking glamor, Goblin's costume being to mechanical, the wrestling scene being too unbelievable) really don't hinder the movie. In fact, I've come to appreciate Dafoe and Dunst's performances even more over time. It's true that the wrestling scene needs a grain of salt for digestion, but it comes and goes with such glee that it doesn't hamper the narrative.
SM2- I just recently noticed that the webbing on Spidey's costume in SM2 was a little less shiny and pronounced. I remember some fans complaining that the costume's webbing looked too armor-like and not enough like a Spider's web. In this one, it didn't reflect as much, and the costume designers made some modifications that helped Tobey and his stunt guy(s?) move with slightly more freedom.
I have great admiration for Alfred Molina's dedication to this craft. I'm still impressed by the shape he got in for this film. I've never made it a secret that Doc Ock isn't a favorite of mine, but Raimi reduced Ock's plot armor and Molina played him as someone physically and mentally capable beyond just his tentacles. Also, I have to praise the costuming/makeup crew for the bruising around Ock's stomach. Details like that enhance the illusion, which is priceless.
SM3- Yes, it was a case of one step forward and one step back at times, but this film covered enough ground to be a fitting third installment. The initial aerial fight between Peter and Harry is rarely mentioned as a great one, which I find baffling. I get the minor complaints about Peter's Spider sense not reacting and him making no effort to cover his face while he fought, but those don't counteract the sleek action of the battle.
Of course, I could write a book about how bad Blowpher was, but the black costume story was screwed even before he hit the screen. This was another one of those examples where I have to wonder if anyone involved in the film actually read and understood the story they were adapting. It was painful to hear Dr. Connors warn Peter that when a symbiotic organism binds to a host it "can be hard to unbind", only to show Peter easily placing it in his trunk not 10 seconds later. Oy vey.
Sandman's characterization was solid and his effects were absolutely gorgeous. The construction site battle is also underrated.
Of course, I still hate that this story didn't come to an end as it was originally planned. I've always wondered if Raimi intended to end SM3 with Peter's voice-over at Harry's funeral? It seemed that way. I may seem a little overly nostalgic, but I owned the ASM Annual 21 when I was a kid and loved it. I still think the wedding was Raimi's end game, and would have been a more fitting send-off.
Another story thread that was left in limbo (perhaps) is whether Robbie Robertson knew Peter was Spider-man. The lingering look in SM2 and his defense of Peter at the Bugle made it seem like Raimi was taking that story point from the comics. Regardless, RIP Bill Nunn.
