Damn right, Stormy!I had a dream last night. In the dream, a friend and I went to see TDK. After which, he said "so. . what did you think? You always 'lowball' a movie, the first time out. . so?"
I replied "Meh. . 4/10."
He slapped me and said "show some respect."
Damn right, Stormy!
Would you enjoy it more coming from me or your friend?I need you to slap me too?
Would you enjoy it more coming from me or your friend?
I'm getting the hang of it by being around you guys.Well played, Ma'am.
Now fly down here, and show me. SHOW ME!
Never under estimate the crap a fan boy can generate when given an outlet.
Better than Scorsese? Spielberg? Guy's living in a dream world to compare a guy who has made four or five films to guys who have been making great movies for four decades.
Never under estimate the crap a fan boy can generate when given an outlet.
Better than Scorsese? Spielberg? Guy's living in a dream world to compare a guy who has made four or five films to guys who have been making great movies for four decades.
Those two guys have also made some really MEDIOCRE/BAD movies too. Nolan is 100% in the quality department, and I think it's because he simply doesn't self-indulge. Like Scorsese for instance. Gangs of New York and the Aviator are good movies, but FAR TOO LONG. The guy over-indulges. I think he has let the praise for his truly great films like Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, and Goodfellas go to his head. Spielberg's latest movie, Indiana Jones 4, is a piece of crap. Nolan would have done much better with it.
I would love to have been a fly on the wall in that pitchBack in 1997 it seemed that Joel Schumachers reviled Batman and Robin, the one in which George Clooneys nipple suit aroused so much derision, had slammed the door on this once-profitable franchise. For a disappointed fan base, an iconic superhero had been made into a laughing stock. The worried executives at Warner Brothers knew that they had to do something radical to restore this jewel of a property.
So they focused their attention on the new generation of indie directors like Chris Nolan. Nolan had bootstrapped himself into the film business, cobbling together bits of 16mm film stock with 6000 to make his first feature, Following (1998), shot over a years worth of weekends.
Memento, which came next, was a critical smash, and with Steven Soderberghs endorsement he landed his first studio assignment: directing Al Pacino and Hilary Swank in Insomnia (2002) on a 50-million budget, which was also a success.
Warner had already been in discussion with Nolan trying to interest him in directing Troy, with little success. But Nolan was invited back to discuss the Batman franchise. He put together a passionate 45-minute pitch for rewinding the Batman saga to its beginning. Alan Horn, Warners president, approved it on the spot. Besides his excitement about the story he wanted to tell, he just brings a certain weight and credibility, he says.
Like Peter Jackson, Nolan is apparently stubborn and good with the sweet-talking.I would love to have been a fly on the wall in that pitch
He also has really soft hands.
He also has really soft hands.
Those two guys have also made some really MEDIOCRE/BAD movies too. Nolan is 100% in the quality department, and I think it's because he simply doesn't self-indulge. Like Scorsese for instance. Gangs of New York and the Aviator are good movies, but FAR TOO LONG. The guy over-indulges. I think he has let the praise for his truly great films like Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, and Goodfellas go to his head. Spielberg's latest movie, Indiana Jones 4, is a piece of crap. Nolan would have done much better with it.