redfirebird2008
Avenger
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2005
- Messages
- 16,788
- Reaction score
- 154
- Points
- 73
At the very least in all of this, she was playing the gender card big time in her comments.
she cares about herself.........................period.[Kanye]Geraldine Ferraro doesn't care about black people![/Kanye]
jag
Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Olbermann for Pres!!!!!olbermann's special comment about this tonight was pretty good.
t:
t:
t:olbermann's special comment about this tonight was pretty good.
yeah, a black female........Check out Barbara Bush's bio; she calls Buchanan "the most blatant racist she'd ever met." Groovy. Who is that "dude looks like a lady" from Air America?Wow, Pat Buchanan just told a female to shut up on MSNBC. I bet he's gonna get in some trouble for that.
I'm not a big Olbermann fan. He comes off as very smug. Or maybe I'm thinking of Anderson Cooper. Meh, they probably both do. Most analysts and talk hosts for cable news networks are smug SOBs.
it's their personal forum/soap box. I rather like Anderson. He's tries to see all sides of the issue.I'm not a big Olbermann fan. He comes off as very smug. Or maybe I'm thinking of Anderson Cooper. Meh, they probably both do. Most analysts and talk hosts for cable news networks are smug SOBs.
Working as a state legislature is a whole different ball game and you are smart enough to know that. Again, its like saying a baseball player will automatically be good at football or basketball.

Well, it should be easy then. McCain is a hothead and Hillary is known as an isolationist in the Senate. My way or the highway, salt the earth if you don't like it. Great.![]()
What was Abe lincolns national experience again?
and to a lesser extent... FDR, teddy, cleveland... barely had more. wilson had none if im correct... and round it off with Clinton, who was criticized for not having alot of experience as well
give up this angle. plenty of presidents on both sides of the aisle who had PLENTY of experience have turned out to be horrible.
i think the presidency should be centered on ability to work with people on both sides of the aisle, solid judgement, and get the people into the process as much as you can.
Experience honestly is a hollow marker for success.
do you honestly think the handfull of years clinton had over bush jr in years as govenor... made him that much more of a better policy president (morals aside)
no... its judgement... working with people, and getting people into the process.

![]()
What was Abe lincolns national experience again?
and to a lesser extent... FDR, teddy, cleveland... barely had more. wilson had none if im correct... and round it off with Clinton, who was criticized for not having alot of experience as well
give up this angle. plenty of presidents on both sides of the aisle who had PLENTY of experience have turned out to be horrible.
i think the presidency should be centered on ability to work with people on both sides of the aisle, solid judgement, and get the people into the process as much as you can.
Experience honestly is a hollow marker for success.
do you honestly think the handfull of years clinton had over bush jr in years as govenor... made him that much more of a better policy president (morals aside)
no... its judgement... working with people, and getting people into the process.
there is no experience in being the president except when you ARE the president... unless your analogy is trying to say that being a president, govenor, senator, whatever... are all the same thing. thats not the case.
i think it would have been better if you compared rookies to Vets. even then the point stands... there is no way to have experience that equates to being a good president outside of being a president.
regardless... sometimes the Rookies come out of the bullpen or off the sidelines with more fire and ferver then any veteren on the field... and become a huge playmaker.
Obama looks to win,so people are doing anything to stop him. Even using the racial terms.
(so stop comparing century old events when there was not a television media to modern times, please).


so the age of television is what demands experience, not...you know...ethics, or anything which despite your argument still existed in the papers and media of the time.
the argument your making about how those past presidents are irelevent based on the television is very confusing, bordering on incomprehensible...
???
how does a TV make experience experience more important? ...or devaluing the comparison?
She did not use a single "racial term."
She did not use a single "racial term."
i agree with you on the ferraro thing, i dont think she made the comments out of some racist sentiment. i think they were mearly very careless.
TV and the internet making evaluating one's experience far more accessible to the average voter. There is a level of information that was not avaliable in the past. With two clicks on Google one can now learn everything they need to about a candidates voting record. We can see countless analysts and strategists duking it out on Meet the Press. Its created a new age. Anyhow Zen, I expected better from you than to ignore the entire bulk of my argument and respond to one sentence.