They need to give the Hulk a hair cut. I saw designs by Aaron Sims with more of the classic Kirby "bowl" cut and he looked 100% better! The more they make him look like the real Hulk, the Kirby/Ayers Hulk, the happier I would be!
Actually, the couch, with Talbot on it went through the window, not the wall, then Hulk smashed the wall, there was no intent in trying to kill him, just teach him a lesson and incapacitate the soldiers, when Talbot hit the one soldier, neither of them flew off in any direction very far at all, Blonsky was flung god knows how far and would have gone further if not for the tree.

I'm talking the university scene, Blonsky wasnt killing people and wouldnt have survived without the serum, which hulk didnt know he had taken.
Even in the end fight though, Hulk incapacitated him without killing him, but only Betty stopped Hulk killing him.


^I'd have to agree, I thought the long hair look in TIH looked superb on the Hulk, hope they keep that for Avengers or any other movie he turns up in.
But Talbot couldnt have been killed, neither was the other soldier, because he wasnt thrown with enough force, Hulk just wanted to incapacitate them.
See my response to CJ, Abom was incapacitated and Hulk still tried to kill him, so in a way he was reasoned with, he was beaten into submission. This wouldnt happen with the dogs as they are mindless, and cant be reasoned with, big difference there.


Hulk definitely isn't innocent but it's supposed to be that "werewolf complex" where he can't control his anger.
That's the whole issue with the Hulk is controlling that inner monster in himself.
If I was that angry and people were trying to hurt me/mortally wound me and I had the power to fight back...you better f***ing believe it I'd fight back.
I guess I'm the only one that doesn't really get bothered by his murder? I think it only makes sense to show Bruce what he has become which makes it even more important to control himself for the sequel.
C'mon its Hollywood, how could you make a movie about a guy that becomes a monster due to his anger issues and not have him kill anybody?
It makes no sense for him to run from every battle when his mind is going postal because everyone is chasing him.
I think it is more dramatic, more for cinema and creates more of an issue everytime Bruce looks in the mirror.
As I have said, I don't consider it murder, just collateral damage.
Self- defense, not murder.
Because he's the Hulk. It's not part of him.
Like Dchulk said I don't consider it murder, just collateral damage. I have less a problem with collateral damage than I do with outright murder. The Hulk would not deliberately kill.
What about killing an enemy, like the Abomination?
Would it have been out of character if Hulk did kill Abomination in TIH?
Yeah this ongoing argument is getting annoying,
I pretty sure captain America has killed lots of people, and thor probably has as well.
In this next movie it would be neat to see if he can gain some control.
I'm going to use the same argument that EP has made regarding the super soldier serum of Blonsky: the Hulk wouldn't have known if it would explode or not. He still threw the missle.
Hulk is an engine of destruction what do you people expect, but he isn't a murderer.
Now either Jamon or El Payaso said that Hulk in Ang's film wouldn't attack if you didn't attack him. So if you left him alone then he would do nothing to you.
Well what about when Hulk came outta the ground in San Francisco and then he picked up that chunk of concrete and was about to throw it at the helicopter but then he saw Betty was inside it so he didn't throw the concrete at the helicopter. So this shows that if Betty wasn't inside the helicopter then Hulk would have attacked it for no reason. He wanted to harm the people inside the helicopter.
He wasn't a murderer, but you gotta admit blonsky had it coming,
Ross and his men ruthlessly chased a BEAST(what happens when you corner a dangerous animal ?) who had wronged no one.
Blonsky attacked hulk first, hulk was just getting even,
and most of the other soldiers didn't die in the movie, if you look closely they all narrowly escape(except for the ones on the helicopter, but hulk was defending himself and Betty.)
Even in the comics(remember WWH:Incredble hulk 110 ) it was made 100% clear that hulk can't really intentionally kill, but that's the comics.
I don't think it was implied that he was trying to kill blonsky, I don't think hulk was thinking "kill" when he kicked blonsky.
If people are going to use the blonsky kick as an example of why TIH is a killer then we should be able to use the scene in Hulk when hulk throws Talbott around like a rag doll at the house as an example of why Ang's hulk is a killer.
*raises hand*
dcHulk: I know, I know.
Kirmit: Yes, dcHulk...
dcHulk: Because the Hulk didn't throw him hard enough!

Another point in question is how you define a killer, remember the dog fight in 'Hulk', Hulk killed the dogs, infact in a rather savage manner, ripping them in half.
Another good point. I'm surprised PETA didn't jump on that one.
The power is not the matter at hand, talbott was still thrown in a way that he could've been killed, therefore does that not make Ang's Hulk a killer?
Especially when you consider Hulk had already roughed Talbott up and he was just laying on the floor, Hulk went out of his way to throw talbott.
Abomination couldn't be reasoned with, infact he would be considered worse since he knew what he was doing, he had full intent, whereas the dogs were only doing as they were trained. Both were attacking hulk, Norton Hulk wanted to kill Abomb, Ang Hulk did kill the dogs therefore they should be considered just as much killers as one another.
No but geting thrown threw a wall and then geting the Hulks foot in your back and pushed threw a railing into the street and then geting picked up and thrown like a rage doll is kind of, I don't know..........................what would you call it..................................Excessive!
It's the intent Jamon.
And clearly tossing around Talbot like that he was trying to A) Help him find his cell Phone, B) Let him know that there's a blue light special at K-Mart or C) trying to kill him.
Blonsky was no longer human at that point and was killing people. Where's the difference?
The comics and every previous incarnation, which have always made sure that Hulk doesnt kill so the concept of a misundewrstood violent but misunderstood monster is the center of the story.
He was trying to teach him a lesson?....................Ok. How's this
When the Hulk kicked Blonsky he was just trying to teach him a lesson as well. You see, the Hulk did ask him in the factory to "Leave me alone" and when Blonsky was all in his face saying, "remember me" and "is that all you got" the Hulk was saying "no that's not all I got." So he kicked him, knowing that he wouldn't die because the Hulk could sense the SSS in him and knew that the tree Blonsky would roll into was a Soft Ash and would give a little when he rolled into it. So I guess in both cases, the Hulk was just trying to teach a lesson. SHEEEEESH!!!!
![]()
But don't you see, the Hulk knows that Abomy will be back and more people will get hurt so he was just trying to save others from being killed. Now, because of Betty, 100's more will die at the hands of Abomy. Thanks a lot Betty.![]()
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa we agree on something.
t:.Talbott couldn't of been killed? I watched it only last night, he was definately thrown hard enough that if he hit his head it would've crackd his skull, hulk didn't exactly place him gently on the floor. Besides Talbott was already incapacitated, he was laying on the floor, Hulk went out of his way to throw him.
Abomb was incapacitated yeah, so why didn't the hulk do the thing with the dogs? Simply incapacitate them, knock them on the head or choke them out like what happened to abomb, he just opted for an outright kill. There is no difference between the mindless dogs and abomb, neither one would stop their rampage and neither one could've been reasoned with, TIH opted for a choke out though whereas hulk opted for ripping them apart.
I was watching sm2 and I saw how spidey stopped the train in that movie, I wondered how would the hulk stop something like maybe a coal train from going into a dead end.
I'd have him run face to face with the train and have a head on collision with it and act as a break on the front of the train. It would be a great way to show exactly how strong the hulk is, a great way of showing heroism and his feats of strengh.
But of course we all know hulk would be blamed for it and later accused of being a murderer, even though no one died.
El Payaso, you bring up the example of Hulk throwing that metal sheet at the helicopter, causing it to explode and to be destroyed. I don't think that Hulk threw that metal sheet at the helicopter wanting to kill the pilot, it never seemed he had the intention to kill. It seemed that Hulk just wanted the helicopter to stop firing and the only way he could do that is if he threw the metal sheet towards it. It never seemed that Hulk aimed to have the sheet hit the blades, he just threw the sheet without real aim, just threw it towards the helicopter as he knew that it would cause the helicopter to stop firing by either the sheet hitting the helicopter or the helicopter dodging the sheet and flying off course.
And Hulk doesn't even kill the pilot! He ejects outta the helicopter when it is tumbling across the ground! Re watch the scene and you see a seat being ejected out.
Jamon I was being facetious.

El Payaso, you say Hulk isn't a killer because Talbott didn't die yet you say TIH is a killer, was it actually ever stated in TIH that anyone died?
Jamon, Abomb may not of been mindless but neither could he be negotiated with, he would not have stopped, exactly like the dogs.
Yes, at least one scientist and 2 hikers had been killed in the past
Banner/Hulk was wanted "in connection with" their deaths - there is not enough info to warrant the claim that he killed them.