Tyler has too much Clark in him for that kind of crap.Tyler could easily pull off Injustice Superman or Superman-Prime.
Okay yes @DKDetective that neckline is far too small.
Agreed.Nah, dude looks waaaaay better now.
Agreed.
No bulking up needed here. That's a great Superman build. It's the suit that fails to properly complement his physique, imo. No puffy Cavill physiques, please.
Agreed.
No bulking up needed here. That's a great Superman build. It's the suit that fails to properly complement his physique, imo. No puffy Cavill physiques, please.
We run the risk of it looking like the Returns suit?It's scenes like this that makes me question on why the show's costume designers can't make something more form fitting for Tyler.
The suit definitely undersold the work Routh did to get in shape, but I'd definitely prefer that to what they're doing with Tyler. Muscle suit-wise that is, in every other aspect Tyler's suit is better.We run the risk of it looking like the Returns suit?
The mere fact that the entire suit has the shield fabric pattern and shield on the buckle and heels BUT not the cape is interesting.The suit definitely undersold the work Routh did to get in shape, but I'd definitely prefer that to what they're doing with Tyler. Muscle suit-wise that is, in every other aspect Tyler's suit is better.
Idc, I'll always love the scruff.
Idc, I'll always love the scruff.
Over the years, within the nerd community, there have been numerous debates about how effective (or not) the Clark Kent disguise is. I’ve participated in a few of those. To the extent that the disguise is remotely plausible, I think it comes down to the “generic” nature of the original comic book artwork. I.e., a generic look puts the character(s) in a very large bucket of similarly nondescript individuals. So even taking into account the glasses, there’s no particular reason (so the argument goes) to connect one to another. That changes, however, if there are certain distinguishing features. Like bushy eyebrows, or an aquiline nose, or a rough complexion, or a crooked tooth or… a 5 o’clock shadow. And for me, Hoechlin’s scruff somewhat diminishes my “willing suspension of disbelief.” Of course, the counter argument runs thusly: since the glasses disguise is so utterly ridiculous, Supes and CK having identical scruff hardly matters. In for a penny, in for a pound.The war on his perma-scruff has been lost.