Uncharted 4: A Thief's End

Status
Not open for further replies.
I8QufPe.png


Chloe! Even if its MP, its good to see her back
 
It streamed on twitch but is it available on YouTube or anything yet
 
open in a new tab

image_uncharted_4_a_thief_s_end-30059-2995_0002.jpg

Splitscreen in Uncharted MP? Like co-op or something?
everything. splitscreen campaign, splitscreen coop missions, splitscreen competitive like in Uc3
What's happening here? Is this a glitch or something, looks like he swings into an invisible wall or something.
no idea buddy.
 
I was never big on the uncharted multiplayer but DAMN does it look good here. I'm actually excited about the mp now.
 
i can understand why people are distasteful about it but i don't really care, personally. they won't be getting any of my money.
 
i can understand why people are distasteful about it but i don't really care, personally. they won't be getting any of my money.
In my mind, the only time people have a right to complain about it is if there is actual content locked behind micro transactions. Giving players the OPTION to pay a few dollars to get upgrades if they don't have time or aren't not very good is totally fine, though there is a fine line. I just roll my eyes at people who complain about THAT.
 
In my mind, the only time people have a right to complain about it is if there is actual content locked behind micro transactions. Giving players the OPTION to pay a few dollars to get upgrades if they don't have time or aren't not very good is totally fine, though there is a fine line. I just roll my eyes at people who complain about THAT.

This
 
Finally beat the trilogy. I loved it, seriously can't wait for the final installment now.
 
In my mind, the only time people have a right to complain about it is if there is actual content locked behind micro transactions. Giving players the OPTION to pay a few dollars to get upgrades if they don't have time or aren't not very good is totally fine, though there is a fine line. I just roll my eyes at people who complain about THAT.
Well people look at it as a sort of pay-to-win concept.
 
In my mind, the only time people have a right to complain about it is if there is actual content locked behind micro transactions. Giving players the OPTION to pay a few dollars to get upgrades if they don't have time or aren't not very good is totally fine, though there is a fine line. I just roll my eyes at people who complain about THAT.

I dont hate it but the counter argument is that this can lead to unbalancing issues. If matchmaking works as it should, people should be placed in matches of people with comparable skill. Level 5 players should be with those around level 5 for example. What happens if a level 5 player has a weapon and boost only available to those at level 50? That kind of breaks the game and can lead to unfair matches. ND is going to need to find a balance so that people arent given an unfair advantage comparable to rest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"