Franklin Richards
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2002
- Messages
- 22,983
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Doubly so.




You really don't see how ridiculous that sounds? What statement could they possibly be making by casting a famous movie star who happens to be Jewish second? Was casting an Australian guy first some kind of statement too? Pandering to the Aussie establishment or something?Having Jane Foster being Jewish doesn't bother me. But making the second actor to be cast in the production being Jewish seemed like a statement to me. Maybe i'm wrong. But that's what I saw.
What's funny is that I don't have that much a problem with Portman cast as Jane Foster. I have a bigger problem with Hemsorth as Thor.
Dude your avatar is Deadpool.t: So as far as bad fanboys...
'Nuff said.
He sure doesn't look Asian.
Tibet. He comes from Tibet I think. Well that's what they were aiming for. Even his armour and all that looks Tibetan.
Correct. I was thinking of Genghis Khan. My bad.Attila the Hun was not Mongolian.
Correct. I was thinking of Genghis Khan. My bad.![]()
Yeah, but it's brown. Obviously there are no similarities between the two because Hogun's helmet is blue and black with white fur.
![]()
Are you not entertained!!!!
Anyway, here is a genuine Tibetan Warriors helm. Looks pretty similar to Hoguns to me with the flaps at the side.
![]()
Having Jane Foster being Jewish doesn't bother me. But making the second actor to be cast in the production being Jewish seemed like a statement to me. Maybe i'm wrong. But that's what I saw.
What's funny is that I don't have that much a problem with Portman cast as Jane Foster. I have a bigger problem with Hemsorth as Thor.
But it's statements like that which made people make Fuhrer jokes. The mass assumption amongst just about everyone was that, because Thor and Loki were being played by unknowns, they announced a relatively big name for Jane Foster. You're the only one who thought this played into some lefty Jewish agenda.