the last son
Superhero
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2012
- Messages
- 5,349
- Reaction score
- 77
- Points
- 33
After credit scenes are lame unless they are truly, truly, worth showing. Haven't seen a good one since iron man.
What bothers me the most about the movie was the fact that we were never shown the impact of Superman's reveal to the planet! Perry White asks Louis to imagine the impact such a being would have on the human race, Pa Kent talks about the change that would happen if Clark were to reveal himself. WHY NOT SHOW US ZACK SNYDER AND DAVID GOYER??!!!!UGH
What bothers me the most about the movie was the fact that we were never shown the impact of Superman's reveal to the planet! Perry White asks Louis to imagine the impact such a being would have on the human race, Pa Kent talks about the change that would happen if Clark were to reveal himself. WHY NOT SHOW US ZACK SNYDER AND DAVID GOYER??!!!!UGH
Did you miss...I don't know...the ENTIRE third act? They setup multiple things in the film that should address that very question. Clark joining the Daily Bugle will cover the media and Superman aspect, the unsure relationship he has with the military, the fact that Kryptonians killed and tried to take Earth as their own which will cause some people of Earth to distrust Superman just based on him being of the same alien race, the huge amount of destruction caused from him stopping the invasion, and of course the tease of Lex Luthor. It is pretty obvious they will show us how Superman's reveal to Earth impacts them.
For some reason, I wanted to see dialogue exchanged with Clark and the oil-rig officers in the heat of rescue. I get that they were setting him up as a alienated figure with a distanced personality, but how sweet would it of been to see Cavill let loose in a tense opening moment?
For some reason, I wanted to see dialogue exchanged with Clark and the oil-rig officers in the heat of rescue. I get that they were setting him up as a alienated figure with a distanced personality, but how sweet would it of been to see Cavill let loose in a tense opening moment?
The whole Krypton part was very muddled. On top of the unstable core you add Zod's coup, political unrest, Zod's racism about the bloodlines and that whole codex crap... by the time Kal-El gets sent off, you're not sure what's going on exactly, and what are the things at stake. Simplicity during that part would have done WONDERS for the audience's investment. Instead, I suspect many must have been all "Wha...? What's going on?" Damn Goyer. I'm so pissed off at the guy right now.
Why, did they not get paid?There's a positive for watching the movie all the way through, even if there's no after-credits teaser. You pay the entire cast and crew respect as their names appear.![]()
I enjoyed the Krypton stuff,but it felt extremely rushed.Jor-El before the Council- 10 seconds,Zod takes over- 20 seconds,Supes sent off -90 seconds.I also found it odd that Zod is sent off to the Phantom Zone (which is reached by ship in this version?) about 2 minutes before Krypton explodes.Jor-El's death at Zod's hands had absolutely no resonance or bearing on the rest of the film,and seemed a blatant attempt just to be different.
I thought Costner was extremely good,and limiting him to flashbacks was very effective.I have to admit, I'm pretty sick of there having to be an argument between the hero and his father/father figure just before he dies.Can't the death be just as impactful if the two are getting along?I'm surprised Batman Begins didn't have 8 year old Bruce arguing with his parents."I just got over a trauma with bats,and you idiots are taking me to an opera?Was the Care Bears movie sold out?"t:
The controversial ending.Supes killing Zod.I think it was played very well,with Superman's remorse.It's interesting that Nolan's three Batman films pay such lip service to the hero not killing (and he almost inevitably does in every movie) while here,it's taken for granted that Supes won't kill,but ends up doing so anyway.My problem with the concept is that it seemed like there was a few different ways Supes could've resolved the situation without killing.(Fly him away from the family he was trying to kill,slam his face into the ground,etc)Granted,how was he gonna stop Zod? I don't know.But it seemed too contrived for my taste.As if it were simply written for shock value.
It would have been so terrible just to put him back in the phantom zone. The end would have been the exat same solution the Avengers had. Just put it in another dimension.That's basically what it was. The ending we saw, Zod getting killed, wasn't in the original script. Zod was supposed to be sent to the Phantom Zone alongside the other Kryptonians. It was Zack Snyder's idea to kill Zod...because it would give reason and impact on why Superman doesn't kill. Like a lesson he had to learn...or something. Nolan, didn't agree with it at first apparently but they talked him into it or something. In my opinion, I don't think he should have killed him. I think he should have sent him away to the Phantom Zone. Or killed him in a different way..not by snapping his neck like it's a twig. They can slam each other into buildings and come out unscathed but they can snap each other's necks easily. Dunno..doesn't sound right to me.
Btw, with Faora locked away in the phantom zone (and she'll probably escape)...anyone else think there's a possible resurrection for Zod in the future? Or will she be a main villain one day?
Btw, with Faora locked away in the phantom zone (and she'll probably escape)...anyone else think there's a possible resurrection for Zod in the future? Or will she be a main villain one day?
It would have been so terrible just to put him back in the phantom zone. The end would have been the exat same solution the Avengers had. Just put it in another dimension.
I credit Goyer and Snyder for having the balls to take that route. Its very unexpected but its an ending that makes sense and is logical. Not just some out of no where solution that we see too many times in CBMs. The Donner movies are so guilty of those.
This is what I had suggested....Like I said, I don't mind Zod getting killed. He had no more purpose in life, he would've been just a killing/hate machine instead of doing the things he did for his people..which is why I think he let Supes kill him. But I don't think snapping his neck was the way to go. It's..too easy, they can take all this punishment and look fine but he can snap his neck like nothing. Doesn't make sense to me.
I also felt it was a bit too quick and somewhat gruesome. I would have preferred to maybe set up a strangle or slower suffocation to see Superman struggling a little more with the horrible decision.
You guys remember 'I Am Legend"...when he has to choke his dog to death as it turns into a monster? Something along those lines, but obviously not with the 'love' between them.
It would have been so terrible just to put him back in the phantom zone. The end would have been the exat same solution the Avengers had. Just put it in another dimension.
I credit Goyer and Snyder for having the balls to take that route. Its very unexpected but its an ending that makes sense and is logical. Not just some out of no where solution that we see too many times in CBMs. The Donner movies are so guilty of those.
After credit scenes are lame unless they are truly, truly, worth showing. Haven't seen a good one since iron man.
You know...I've watched and read and loved comic book media all my life. Grew up on the big 3 - Spider-man, Superman, and Batman.
There are many versions of those heroes out there. Batman has every type of iteration imaginable, everything from campy Adam West Batman to the serious, dark Nolan Batman, and everything in between that. And seriously, I like them all in their own way.
Same with Spidey. Watched the old Spider-man cartoons growing up, watched Spidey and his Amazing Friends with Iceman and Firestar, liked the Sam Raimi films (except 3) and tASM as well. Not perfect films, but overall no big complaints. All different versions of Spidey, but still liked them in their own way.
But Superman....
Supes is different. And I'm not just saying it to be saying it. SUPERMAN IS DIFFERENT. The godlike, larger than life hero...truth, justice and the American way. There's something more to Superman than just his powers, his abilities. Superman is like baseball and apple pie, he's a cultural icon, he's a symbol. The stakes are bigger than just beating up aliens. Superman is about striving for greater. Maybe I'm stupid and nostalgic, but I think that's what MOS was missing. It was jaw-dropping, awesome, and a spectacle, and honestly the story telling wasn't bad either. But it wasn't full of heart and soul. It wasn't inspirational, hopeful, full of Americana. It didn't feel triumphant. It was just an action movie.
Maybe it was the music, which was good, but not John Williams. I didn't feel the majesty. Everything was heavy, dark, serious, and though Superman can definitely go into those darker territories, there is always something that speaks to the inner believer in us all. Hope. Goodness.
So, yes it had all the stuff people were begging for since "Returns", the complete destructive action and over the top fight scenes, but the MOS didn't "feel" like Superman.
Well, Clark can run faster than a speeding bullet, after all, so there is that. Or, the alternative (and this is what that youtube suggests and I forgot about) Clark is the one to save the dog instead of his dad and that's how he gets sucked up into the tornado.