I'm surprised that the mainstream or other websites besides Aint It Cool News haven't picked up Fox's lazy method of making films. Granted they have the best marketing in the business, but that's it.
After seeing films like Date Movie, Alien Vs. Predator 1 and 2, Hitman, X-Men: The Last Stand, Fantastic Four 1 and 2, The League of Extordinary Gentlemen, Daredevil, Electra, and more...I figure that Fox doesn't care about quality. They like to butcher movies like Kingdom of Heaven and Live Free or Die Hard. They fired the director of 'Hitman', and reshot a bunch of scenes with a new director. They almost sabotage Borat by cutting down on the number of releases in theaters nationwide, until it became a hit. Let's not mention the whole X3 pre-production fiasco.
It's amazing. I mean...all of the studios are full of crap sometimes, but Fox takes it all in for being the ONE studio that doesn't give a darn.
FOX can do whatever they want, be grateful they are actually being as faithful as they are.
I hate to say it but your right. That's my biggest fear with this movie is that its produced by Fox. Even if they shoot it well and the actors do thier job I could see Fox chopping it to bits so they can get like six showings in one day.
I'm surprised that the mainstream or other websites besides Aint It Cool News haven't picked up Fox's lazy method of making films. Granted they have the best marketing in the business, but that's it.
After seeing films like Date Movie, Alien Vs. Predator 1 and 2, Hitman, X-Men: The Last Stand, Fantastic Four 1 and 2, The League of Extordinary Gentlemen, Daredevil, Electra, and more...I figure that Fox doesn't care about quality. They like to butcher movies like Kingdom of Heaven and Live Free or Die Hard. They fired the director of 'Hitman', and reshot a bunch of scenes with a new director. They almost sabotage Borat by cutting down on the number of releases in theaters nationwide, until it became a hit. Let's not mention the whole X3 pre-production fiasco.
It's amazing. I mean...all of the studios are full of crap sometimes, but Fox takes it all in for being the ONE studio that doesn't give a darn.
1) Transformers sucked. If this turned out like that I would kill myself.in order for that to happen they would need the Wachowski's as directors and a much stronger lead actor. Shia Lebouf carried TF. if it weren't for him, the movie wouldn't have been nearly as good.
you and Octoberist bring up great points. i think what happened is that Fox sat on the idea of a DB movie for the longest time, then when they saw that Transformers was uber successful they probably thought "cartoons CAN be made into successful movies! let's try to duplicate that success....except we'll use less talent and money."
1) Transformers sucked. If this turned out like that I would kill myself.
2) Shia LaBouf is MORE annyoing than Chatwin. All he says is "NO NO NON ON ONO NO NONONONONONO"
3) If it weren't for the annoying humans in transformers, the movie MIGHT have been entertaining instead of the snoozefest it was.
well at least you're willing to show your bias.I never liked Transformers though, seemed incredibly stupid.
i thought that TF was only "okay" also, but that's besides the point. you responded to my post and my post only stated that it was SUCCESSFUL movie. i wasn't stating my opinion of the movie...i was saying that it made a lot of dinero.The thing is, I thought Transformers was just OK. Shia seemed to be over acting in the beginning, with some of the comedy and tension feeling forced. It had great special effects, though.
not really. Trasformers had the benefit of 2 insanely successful directors, 1 as producer, the top special effects house (ILM) and 2 self-proclaimed fans as writers, as well as a solid lead actor. DB, on the other hand, has a very mediocre (arguably crumby) director doubling as the writer, a great producer who doesn't seem to really care, a pretty good SFX team, and a lead actor who constantly gets negative comments from non-regulars and people on other forums. the only similarities between the way these movies are being handled is that both aren't as faithful as they could be. TF had the makings of a hit...DB is a half-assed attempt at duplicating that hit.Hopefully, Fox doesn't follow the Transformer model too closely (even though that seems to be their plan).
1) Are you saying that what a movie makes in box office revenue is what makes it good?1 - the people who pitched in to contribute a $706 mil box office would disagree with you.
2 - kinda hard to beat Chatwin in the annoying department. i remember when they announced that he was cast every person who commented on Chatwin kept asking or saying something about "Tom Cruise's ANNOYING son from War of the Worlds". on the other hand, i've only heard a few people say that Shia LaBeouf was annoying. you're one of those few and it's no surprise.
3 - i wish the humans played a smaller role but Transformers was one of the most popular movies of 2007. hardly a snoozefest.
I believe it will have a better story than... well, wait, did Transformers even have a story?! I seriously can't even remember. It was just action scenes and Anthony Anderson acting like an idiot, then Bernie Mac, cut to Megan Fox looking hot, then more explosions.as far as Chatwin vs LaBeouf, most people who aren't regulars here have expressed that they found Chatwin annoying in War of the Worlds and some who saw Invisible found him to be the same in that movie....i have to agree. despite your opinion (which is not the end all be all) most people who know about Chatwin find him annoying....while only a handful found LaBeouf annoying.
as for your comment about story and believable action making a movie......do you realize wtf movie we're talking about here? do you honestly think DB will have a deep story and believable action? you're frikkin' out of your gourd!
My bias on what? On hating crappy movies?once again...your bias shows. keep on defending...your efforts will be futile come August 15th.