In X2, the white was transparent in that you can still see a hint of the iris behind it.
Yes, but the effect of how it turns white is always different.
In X2, the white was transparent in that you can still see a hint of the iris behind it.
I'm not up on all the rites to this character or that character and what the studio can and can not do, but why would they have been sued??To be fair they woulda been sued if they did the latter
To be fair they woulda been sued if they did the latter
Considering Fox owns the familial rights to the Lensherrs/Maximoffs, they wouldn't have been sued at all.
They probably didn't let him use his energy blasts through his hands because that would look so similar to Havok. Remember Havok has red blasts in the films.
I hated Bishop's representation. Since when does Bishop need a gun to channel his power. That was just plain ridiculas and silly how they watered him down.
I don't see why that would be the case considering Havok never shot any blasts in the films. His powers manifested as red rings which came from his chest. Visually they would have looked different than Bishop if they stuck to pink blasts he shot from his fist like in the books.
Rewatch his only power display in DOFP. It came out from his hand.
What I liked about Holt was his voice, which is deep and rich enough to give you a sense of the gravitas of the older Beast (in contrast to his skinny kid appearance).I think Holt's Beast was one of the stand out characters in this movie. And for once his make up didn't make me cringe.