You know something that's weird to me: if Mystique assassinating Trask is the lynchpin for this dystopian future, then why is it that his survival is so important? Because in the viral campaign his death is never mentioned, and never mentioned as some sort of major public event. It could just be that the viral people have been instructed to avoid that plot point because it's too spoilery, but the film-makers themselves have hinted and/or flat out told us that it's Trask who is the target, correct? (someone correct me if I'm wrong).
What I'm getting at is, if his death isn't a major public event leading to backlash against mutants, then why is it so significant? We all keep seeing Trask as the bad guy here, but what if the reason his death is significant is because of something like: the sentinels later bug out and start killing everyone, and Trask could have prevented it due to his intimate knowledge of their programming? What if the goal isn't "Stop Mystique from assassinating someone who's death sparks outrage against mutants", but "save the life of the one guy who can later stop the sentinels"?
Just a thought that occurred to me.
Something else interesting: in the tv roll call spot, Logan says that at first the Sentinels started targeting X-Men, then targeting "everyone else." The 25 moments site says that Angel was killed during a protest in 2011, "in the ensuing chaos" of Sentinels attacking protestors. The sentinel in the picture is a Mark I sentinel. Could it be that even before the Mark X, someone was programming sentinels to assassinate X-Men and make it look like accidents?
I wonder what event Wolverine is trying to prevent. Seemingly the X3 Alcatraz Island would be the point-in-time to change .
But an Assassination in the 70s is what he is going to change.
(it would be cool to see Logan tell Charles not to suppress Jeans Phoenix power and instead teach her more control to prevent a explosive release)
Yeah I'm suspicious Logan is going to be tempted to drop some other hints to Charles. I mean, how could he not? I would.
Ever since that first trailer, with Young Xavier shouting "I don't want your future, I don't want your suffering" I've wondered what he's talking about, because it doesn't strike me as something one would say to someone trying to warn you how to avert a dystopian future -- I mean, hello, that's what Old Xavier is trying to help you prevent, right? Why are you mad at HIM? I wonder if that's NOT what Young Xavier is talking about. Maybe what he is saying is, "I don't want the events of the OT where one of my pupils goes beserk, kills me, kills Scott, and sets back mutant-human relations." Which leads to me think one of two things is going on here: that the timeline has already been altered, hence Future Xavier not being dead, and Young Charles doesn't want to restore the original one; or, Wolverine's dropped some hints about other bad stuff that's happened in the OT, and Young Charles wants more information so he can prevent those things too (and that Old Charles is going to be resistant to making additional alterations).
(I hope that all makes sense -- this topic always turns my brain to mush).