Probably none. As much as I'd like to read Secret Avengers just for the creative team and maybe Avengers because of the characters, I'm not very likely to buy the monthly issues for $4 books without backup stories. Academy sounds good, but I doubt it will win out over other books I'm thinking about picking up after Mighty Avengers ends.
While I will read SECRET and ACADEMY, I do agree with the angle that $4 books are not the future. While all comics have diminishing returns, I've seen drops of some 20-30% within 6-12 months for even TOP sellers like NEW AVENGERS since they became $3.99. Surely whatever cash money is gained by the increased prices has been canceled out by diminished sales by now. Marvel seems to quietly admit that by relaunching NEW AVENGERS, a title that not long ago was selling about 90k an issue. DC has seemed to admit that many of their $3.99 books, even with back-up's, did not do well and is backing off for quite a few titles, like BOOSTER GOLD.
Some people laugh at VERTIGO for offering debut issues at $1, since if sales don't sustain, the series actually never absorbs that loss. But what they don't get is that a debut issue's point is to try to either entice people to try out the rest, or to buy it in collected form. DC has embraced the trade market and has a bigger presence in bookstores; Marvel still sells trades through Diamond exclusively, which is kind of like hiring a professional wrestler to do your tax return.
Comics have been "recession proof" in the past by being cheap. The last time unemployment was this bad, comics were about $1.25 on average. Of course, $1.25 twenty years ago is more like $2.75 now (at least) with inflation, but still. When it is very likely, especially in New York, when 1 out of every 10 comic fans might be unemployed, $3.99 comics are not sustainable. They allowed Marvel to escape 2009 mostly unscratched while magazines and newspapers have fallen. That's fine. But such a strategy is not sustainable long term. The question is whether anyone in editorial knows that, or if blind, unadulterated greed will blind their judgment, just like blind greed has convinced the electronics and media industry that the best thing people want to do during a recession is spend $200-$500 on a Blu Ray machine and have to upgrade their ENTIRE movie collection for the second time within 15 years.
Of course, if more people actually spent their money while using daffy things like "perspective" or "common sense", debt wouldn't be as high and the economy might be better. But what do I know? I'm not even middle management.
