Sequels Which Story Line Should Spiderman 4-5 Be About

[pooh912]

yea but that will take way to long i say number 4 have kraven and lizard number 5 either have sinister 6 or have electro and some other villain

 

[pooh912]

yea but that will take way to long i say number 4 have kraven and lizard number 5 either have sinister 6 or have electro and some other villain

 

[anrrd_2]

way too long? if the films shoot back to back they will most likely be released only 1 year apart from each other (much like potc)...thats too long? besides...i would rather see no kraven at all then to see him take away from the villian weve waited 4 movies to see

 

[pooh912]

i mean to wait til number 6

 

[anrrd_2]

that may be have been alittle excessive lol...but im biased when it comes to my gwen/hobgoblin storyline lol

 

[pooh912]

lol i understand

 

[anrrd_2]

i think aside from lizard kraven storyline...i would like to see the scorpion and rhino stoy similar to what they did in the sm3 game...with meccabiocon labs and all that stuff.

 

[pooh912]

i want to see electro
i think he would b great on screen

 

[the amazing fro]

4 should be a KRAVENS LAST HUNT with lizard in the place as vermin. Throw lizards origin and spidermans first meeting with kraven and you've got a pretty damn good movie.

5 I'm not too sure on. I'm thinking either venom and carnage (do him RIGHT this time or don't do him at all) or mysterio and electro. Or vulture

 

[anrrd_2]

lizard DESERVES more than one movie....and given that 4 and 5 are going to shoot simutaneously you can bet that they will both feature the same villian. if lizard and kraven were in 4 and then someone else in 5 then there would be no need to shoot the movies back to back

 

[the amazing fro]

but what would be the point?

If you end 4 with lizard changing back into Connors then it will feel more wholesome. If you prolong t over two movies then it will become boring and dragged out. Plus its just wasting screen time for other villains I want to see

 

[anrrd_2]

but what would be the point?

If you end 4 with lizard changing back into Connors then it will feel more wholesome. If you prolong t over two movies then it will become boring and dragged out. Plus its just wasting screen time for other villains I want to see

maybe he doesnt become connors in the end? maybe lizard escapes into the sewers...maybe he IS brought back, but in 5 something happens to make him freak out and turn back into the lizard?

 

[the amazing fro]

maybe he doesnt become connors in the end? maybe lizard escapes into the sewers...maybe he IS brought back, but in 5 something happens to make him freak out and turn back into the lizard?

But yet again it would feel dragged out.

and yet again I want different bad guys for different movies.

 

[anrrd_2]

and im not saying your wrong for wanting that....but if they ARE doing different bad guys for different movies...why shoot them at the same time?

 

[the amazing fro]

Has it been confirmed they are shooting at the same time?

 

[thejon93]

I disagree with all of the opinions on this poll. First off, how could Venom/Carnage be pulled off when Venom was already killed in the third film? If they bring Venom back, the film will get a lot of bad buzz from the majority of the target audience because it's rediculous. Spider-Man has a whole gallery of villains to choose from and their best bet would be to bring back which was undoubtably the killer of 'Spider-Man 3', the symbiote. Bad enough it felt like a great, big coincidence when it landed right by Peter in the park. Second, if I've done enough research by this point on the Sinister Six, their leader is Doctor Octopus, again, if he's not dead, why would he still have a beef with Spidey considering he took control of the arms? And also, it would make sense to leave him dead because Doc Ock's last line said it all: "I will not die a monster". Doc Ock's return is completely unnessisary, like I said before, Spidey has a whole gallery of worthy villains and they don't at all need to re-hash an already used villain. And plus, he had a whole movie deticated to him, don't you think that's enough?

 

[Illusion Master]

Aw....nobody wants Mysterio to have his own movie?It'd be GREAT, and I don't care what anyone says when they say Goblin/Venom are the BEST at messing with Spidey's head, I say Mysterio is he'd be able to break Spidey's will to live if he tried hard enough.

 

[pooh912]

No Mysterio Bein The Main Villian In A Spidey Movie Would Be Just About The Worst Idea Ever

 

[fallenAngel]

I would love to see Mysterio.

But I want to see Lizard more.

But other than Hobgoblin and Kraven, there aren't any other villains I really care about. I'm fairly indifferent to Electro, Vulture and Scorpion.

 

[Visionary]

Has it been confirmed they are shooting at the same time?

Hell no, it's nothing but BS rumors thus far.

 

[pooh912]

lol yea it is but hopefully the bs rumors are true

 

[pooh912]

mysterio could never be a main villian
does anybody agree

 

[The_Mighty_Thor]

No, he could be an awesome villian with the right director and writer.

 

[Venom 1988]

mysterio could never be a main villian
does anybody agree

No, I highly disagree.

 

[pooh912]

yea any villian can be good with the write director and stuff but he cant be a main villian im sorry. wat would yall suggest he look like