Who would you want to see as VP

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ShadowBoxing, Jan 30, 2008.

  1. ShadowBoxing Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    30,643
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can assume anyone in the race becomes the Pres.Nominee.
     
  2. Steve Rogers Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wesley Clark.
     
  3. StorminNorman Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    30,519
    Likes Received:
    1
  4. ShadowBoxing Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    30,643
    Likes Received:
    0
    [ron burgundy]I'm with you 100% of the time, all the time, with that. And that does make good sense :up:[/ron burgundy]
     
  5. rdh007 Brit Wannabe

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    For Clinton; Clark if it's McCain or Edwards if it's Romney (someone's gotta battle that hair)

    For Obama; Mark Warner or Tim Kaine or *drumroll* Chuck Hagel

    For McCain; I'd like Lieberman but it'll be Giuliani (the 9/11 ticket) or some Southern fascist

    For Romney; Fred Thompson or Huckabee (though Huckabee would in a fit of irony probably think of Romney as a cultist)
     
  6. Malice BMFH

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2001
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are ALL incorrect!
    ;)

    McCain - Huckabee on VP, but Guiliani will be Homeland Security and Lieberman, Sec of State

    Romney - no idea

    Clinton - no idea

    Obama - no idea on VP, but Edwards might be Attorney General
     
  7. rdh007 Brit Wannabe

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now there's a war waiting to happen.
     
  8. cookiva Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly what I'm thinking.

    Romney - No idea

    Clinton - Wes Clark or Evan Bayh

    Obama - Honestly starting to think that it WILL be Tim Kaine. For some reason, I just see it....
     
  9. The Senator Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,290
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is who I want, though I don't see them as actually getting the position:

    Clinton: Barack Obama, solely for the reason that our party NEEDS to win this election, and we cannot go into the election divided... especially if we're up against Walnuts McCain.

    Obama: Brian Schweitzer. Two charismatic populists on one ticket?! Well I never...
     
  10. cookiva Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,076
    Likes Received:
    0

    See. thats true, but threre is too much bad blood right now between them.
     
  11. The Senator Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,290
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think Hillary is running scared at this point. Huge negatives coming out of South Carolina, McCain almost sealing the deal with independent voters... despite all the bickering back and forth, I see her people trying to work some sort of arrangement with Obama. "If I win, I'll take you on as my VP, but if you win... don't feel obligated to do the same." And why wouldn't Obama take it? His chances of going somewhere else in politics is over after he loses the nomination.

    Also, you have to remember... this is politics. People say things, do things, act a certain way throughout a campaign or a debate on a bill, but at the end of it all, they learn to suck it up and go on with their lives. The public is seeing an all-out brawl; in actuality, I've heard the interactions between her and his campaign are quite civil on a personal level, snubs and handshakes aside.

    The other thing is, the inevitability of McCain winning the nomination and possibly the presidency will make the leaders of the Democratic Party sit Hillary down and say, "look, this is what you have to do, we're not going to let you screw this one up." I think she wants to win, and I think she knows that Clinton-Boring '08 isn't going to do it for her.

    But... I said this is how I want this to play out, and would crap myself if it actually happened.
     
  12. StorminNorman Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    30,519
    Likes Received:
    1
    We can't be incorrect since the title is "Who Would You WANT To See" ;)

    If we are going to guess WHO the VP's are:

    McCain will be either Huckabee or Gov. Crist
     
  13. Chris B Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    107

    The problem is having a woman at the top of the ticket and a black guy at the bottem seems too risky. It has always seemed to me that Hillary and Obama would both go with a white guy to balance the ticket.
     
  14. Chris B Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    107
    Evan Bayh.
     
  15. The Senator Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,290
    Likes Received:
    1
    Keep in mind, that's what I want to see.

    BUT... If it's Clinton vs. McCain, and McCain already has an edge over her with the independents, what would she have to lose? Obama as a VP could bring in a good chunk of the supporters he (BO) already had. And I would be under the impression that, given the fact she wants to win, she'll let Obama overshadow her campaign more than her husband has throughout the primaries.
     
  16. Chris B Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    107
    But would a woman/black guy ticket turn off independents due to the whole "too much diversity too soon" argument? I think that it would make sense for either one to pick a white guy to simply serve as a transition to a non-white man President.
     
  17. The Senator Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,290
    Likes Received:
    1
    It raises an interesting question, but I think there's a notable difference. Both candidates are well known and have transcended race and gender expectations during this contest. There's a difference between Hillary picking Obama and Hillary picking James Clyburn, or Obama picking Hillary and Obama picking Janet Napolitano. Hillary and Obama have name recognition and Americans already have an opinion of them one way or another, whereas Clyburn and Napolitano need to become better known among the American people. Putting an unknown minority on a ticket would draw more attention to that candidate's campaign.

    I only see it happening if Clinton barely becomes the nominee, which is looking more and more likely since she's lost her lead in Massachusetts, and California and other western states are starting to tighten with each day. Obama would be stupid to pick her as a running mate, because she doesn't add anything. Obama would be the one to pick "generic white male with executive experience from some place other than the Northeast."

    Would it be risky? Yes. Would it be stupid? Not entirely. Would it be bold, attention getting, and a way to generate excitement to the ticket? Yes. The Democratic Party would be wise to break a boundary this time around, because if Clinton-Boring loses in 2008, it's going to be incredibly hard to pick the party up from a loss they should have been able to avoid. If Clinton-Obama loses in 2008, then they can at least say they united the party, they did something groundbreaking... and the strategy simply didn't work.

    Like I said, what more would she have to lose?
     
  18. cookiva Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,076
    Likes Received:
    0

    The presidency?
     
  19. Chris B Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    107
    Hillary has lost her leads in California and Massachusetts? I'm surprised, not so much with MS, as I am CA.
     
  20. The Senator Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,290
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well I mentioned that as a possibility. But if she's up against McCain... why not? It at least puts the focus on her campaign.
     
  21. cookiva Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,076
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I was just joking. What it does is it gives her the change card. She basically steals Obama's platform of "change" to use against McCain, which is what she would have to have against him.
     
  22. The Senator Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,290
    Likes Received:
    1
    I figured you were joking, but I have to respond. I always have to respond. :oldrazz:
     
  23. rdh007 Brit Wannabe

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd think she'd have to offer Obama something to do as VP. My guess would be a strong role in foreign relations, but that's only a guess.
     
  24. Venom'sDad Enter The Sym

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    9,052
    Likes Received:
    94
    I think the question is would he offer her the VP or any other position in his cabinet... I say he will not in both cases, because he wants to distance himself from the Clintons and their way of doing things, at the same time, have people he can trust... as he said tonight; and yes, that was a swipe at her.
     
  25. hippie_hunter The King is Back!

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    53,331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually if you look up at RealClearPolitics which pretty much shows every relevant poll, she is still in the lead in both Massachusetts and California.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"