Why the hate for Wolverine?

undomiel said:
On the contrary -- many of the world's greatest love stories end tragically. Romeo and Juliet's love didn't have a chance either and it didn't end happily; this didn't mean Romeo didn't love Juliet with a great love.

Yes, the love story between Jean and Logan is tragic because it wasn't meant to be and therefore did not work out.

Others, however do. Luke Skywalker and Mara Jade. They started out as bitter enemies with Mara absolutely determined to kill Luke. Yet something happened. Not only did they manage to turn their feelings around from hatred into love, but they used the strength of their love and faith to overcome impossible obstacles and even defeat a killer disease. Love conquered all. The latter part, especially about overcoming impossible obstacles with love and faith parallels nicely with the relationship between Scott and Jean. Scott and Jean's relationship is clearly meant to be and therefore it not only works out but survives. Even death is seen as a temporary setback for them. To ignore this is to discredit one of the most famous and enduring relationships in comic-lore. A relationship which survives no matter what. Just like with Luke and Mara.

When you pair up the right man and woman, the relationship works out.
 
ntcrawler said:
Oh no you don't. No way you're going to try pulling that argument. If you can pull a theater magazine, I can pull a fitness magazine.

But at least a theater magazine is actually part of the same industry.
 
danoyse said:
But at least a theater magazine is actually part of the same industry.

I consider both to have an equal footing as far as declaring who has *IT* or is popular in the public eye. Both have equal visibility in the magazine rack of any newsstand or store as well as access to readers. Being on the cover of a major magazine is no small achievement and clearly a good sign.
 
ntcrawler said:
Others, however do. Luke Skywalker and Mara Jade. They started out as bitter enemies with Mara absolutely determined to kill Luke. Yet something happened. Not only did they manage to turn their feelings around from hatred into love, but they used the strength of their love and faith to overcome impossible obstacles and even defeat a killer disease. Love conquered all. The latter part, especially about overcoming impossible obstacles with love and faith parallels nicely with the relationship between Scott and Jean. Even death is seen as a temporary setback for them. To ignore this is to discredit one of the most famous and enduring relationships in comic-lore. A relationship which survives no matter what. Just like with Luke and Mara.

Yes, but Luke and Mara exist only in the extended universe. He had quite the crush for Princess Leia in ANH--in fact, there was a kiss between the two edited from Empire Strikes Back. The sister plotline was developed late in the process.

Again, this is taking things under the perception that *everyone* knows the backstory of Scott and Jean when they saw the movies for the first time. They don't. I didn't realize they were engaged until I watched the behind-the-scenes features on the DVD.

From the perspective of someone not familiar with the comics, they were a couple in love, sure...but this undying love thing never quite played out the same way on screen.
 
You may be correct on the quote, but you are incorrect with the final result that was portrayed on screen.

I beg to differ...I suspect the difference is simply a matter of your perception. Are you suggesting that the authors, intending to put Frodo at the center, just accidentally slipped up and added Aragorn as well? And if the movie gave equal time to Frodo and Aragorn, then it was a departure from the book, the source-material, which I thought was a cardinal sin among some of you?

And even though Legolas may have *IT* and had his fangirls screaming after him, his role wasn't tweaked to make him the star or the hero of the movie. Do you agree or disagree wit that?

*Chuckles* Such an interesting question! But I prefer to get at the question-behind-the-question. You are implying that Wolverine's role was tweaked (expanded) after an outpouring of "fangirl" affection? But how would one know if his role was altered -- have you any proof? Haven't most people said Wolverine was Singer's favorite character anyway? And, incidentally, if they didn't do it for Legolas in LOTR, there's even less reason to believe they'd have done it for Wolvie in X-Men!

But even if they did expand his role because he played it so well that it was a smash with the audience, I wouldn't have a problem with it. I subscribe to the school of good adaptation and artistic license!
 
Yes, the love story between Jean and Logan is tragic because it wasn't meant to be and therefore did not work out.

Others, however do. Luke Skywalker and Mara Jade. They started out as bitter enemies with Mara absolutely determined to kill Luke. Yet something happened. Not only did they manage to turn their feelings around from hatred into love, but they used the strength of their love and faith to overcome impossible obstacles and even defeat a killer disease. Love conquered all. The latter part, especially about overcoming impossible obstacles with love and faith parallels nicely with the relationship between Scott and Jean. Scott and Jean's relationship is clearly meant to be and therefore it not only works out but survives. Even death is seen as a temporary setback for them. To ignore this is to discredit one of the most famous and enduring relationships in comic-lore. A relationship which survives no matter what. Just like with Luke and Mara.

When you pair up the right man and woman, the relationship works out.

You're forgetting something -- this is a movies thread. I'm not concerned with what happened in the comics because they were telling a different story in the movies.

But I wonder whose is the more famed love story -- Romeo and Juliet (known throughout the world and has endured for centuries) or, say, Luke and Mara Jade (invented some time in the last few decades and whom I've never even heard of before this post)?

In my opinion, Jean and Scott make a very boring love story. Two nice, polite, well-educated people getting married. That's all fine in real life, but it doesn't make for a very interesting story, see? There's no tension. Sure, it may end happily-ever-after, but that's so Disney. I prefer a tragic love story, like the one we got with Jean and Logan.
 
ntcrawler said:

Argument: I hate Wolverine
Counter: Why??? Wolverine is so lovable!
Argument: I hate the way he was portrayed in the film
Counter: But he did so many great things in the film! He's a hero! [squee!]
Argument: I hate the way he displaced other chars and took over their roles and did things that Wolverine would never do
Counter: But he's so popular! So that's what fans wanted to see!


Wow, isn't that a one-sided argument. To some, it sounds more like:

First post: I think Wolverine is great and Hugh Jackman does a great job playing him. Why do so many people have a problem with him?

Anti: He's overexposed! He takes up too much screentime! He took over Cyclops' part!

Pro: He's the most popular, and people are jealous (LS's first reply), and the same thing happens with Storm. The actor stood out more as reviews have shown, and has even had an impressive career since.

Anti: FOX SUCKS!!! They hated Cyclops from the beginning and made Wolverine take all of his lines.

Pro: Yes, Fox does suck, and Cyclops deserved a bigger role...but you can almost understand from a business standpoint why the more popular character, who spent most of the first film shirtless and with the best lines appealed to a wider audience than a guy with a bit of a stuffed-shirt attitude, a visor stuck on his face, and who doesn't remember to take his NSync cds out of his car.

Anti: But Cyclops was completely appealing with his roughly 30 minutes of screentime across 3 movies! How could you not see that?

Pro: Well, knowing the comic books more than a casual fan, you would be able to see the nuances of the character better than someone meeting them for the first time, such as with any adapation.

Anti: But the Star Wars didn't do that! LOTR didn't do that! Even though those films came directly from either their creator or only one form of source material.

Pro: Well, I don't think James Marsden had a chance to shine in the movie as well as Hugh Jackman did.

Anti: Hugh didn't do anything special.

Pro: Well he got great reviews for all 3 movies, and I happened to catch his stage performance which was fantastic and got even more good reviews, and...

Anti: VAN HELSING!!!

Pro: Ugh, well that movie sucked. The point is that he stood out more with his role in X-Men, which is why...

Anti: VAN HELSING!!!!!

Pro: OK, we get it. Look, I think James Marsden is great, but I think in a role where he doesn't have the visor blocking his face will help him more, he does have such amazing eyes and I didn't realize until....

Anti: I can't stand stupid people. Your opinion isn't a fact! This is a hate thread, why don't you get out to your happy Wolverine-land, because it must be so easy to be a Wolverine fan.

Pro: Dude, calm down...we're agreeing with you to a certain extent. Why is anyone offering an even slightly different viewpoint being shot down as wrong and stupid? We know the Cyclops fans got screwed, we know he had a much more vital role in the comics, and we sympathize. It's not the first (or last) time it's happened with any franchise. People are just trying to explain why they think it happened.

Anti: Well, obviously people refuse to accept reality.


Sounds more like the circles we've going around in this silly, silly thread. :p
 
Wolverine was well portrayed in the three films, he just took too much time and focus away from many other important characters.
 
undomiel said:
In my opinion, Jean and Scott make a very boring love story. Two nice, polite, well-educated people getting married. That's all fine in real life, but it doesn't make for a very interesting story, see? There's no tension. Sure, it may end happily-ever-after, but that's so Disney. I prefer a tragic love story, like the one we got with Jean and Logan.

Scott and Jean are soooo not boring. But seeing as how you want to focus solely on the movies for this basis, then tell me why does Logan love her so much. What is it that creates that tension? Hmmm... That undying love? I'll buy the attraction, Logan's hot, so's Jean, but no way in seven rings of hell are you convincing me that Logan loved this woman with unending, tragic devotion, and because of that, his killing her was not tragically beautiful, it was tragically lame.
 
weatherwitch said:
Scott and Jean are soooo not boring. But seeing as how you want to focus solely on the movies for this basis, then tell me why does Logan love her so much. What is it that creates that tension? Hmmm... That undying love? I'll buy the attraction, Logan's hot, so's Jean, but no way in seven rings of hell are you convincing me that Logan loved this woman with unending, tragic devotion, and because of that, his killing her was not tragically beautiful, it was tragically lame.
They gave all of Scott's emotions to Jean, right to Logan. But I don't think it's boring.
 
Logan and Jean didn't really have the time to develop the bond that Scott and Jean could have had in the films. They hadn't even met until X1 so the sacrifice doesn't hold the weight that it would have if Cyke had been involved.
 
Iceman/Psylocke said:
Wolverine was well portrayed in the three films, he just took too much time and focus away from many other important characters.
ORLY?
deletedscenewolverine7sk6rg6.jpg
 
weatherwitch said:
I'll buy the attraction, Logan's hot, so's Jean, but no way in seven rings of hell are you convincing me that Logan loved this woman with unending, tragic devotion, and because of that, his killing her was not tragically beautiful, it was tragically lame.

:up:
 
danoyse said:

no, no buts. I'm right at this point. Admit it. You're running out of arguments to refute this and it's not working.

Luke and Mara exist only in the extended universe.

And Romeo and Juliet exist only in the Shakespearean universe. Therefore if you won't let my example apply, then your example doesn't apply either.

Besides, extended universe is consdered canonical part of Star Wars movieverse., btw. Scott and Jean, however exist in all the known universes and incantations of the X-Men. This is hardly an alternative, "what-if" backstory but a major part of every story.

He had quite the crush for Princess Leia in ANH--in fact, there was a kiss between the two edited from Empire Strikes Back. The sister plotline was developed late in the process.
So? Logan's obsessive love with Jean and him going in for the kiss and makeout session wasn't put in from the start, either. But Scott and Jean's relationship was was there from the start and was made clear from the start. Logan sees them holding hands, and Jean makes it clear they sleep in the same room. Then there's the part about "stay away from my girl". He should have taken the hint that she's not available. Putting his nose into forbidden territory is not a sign of devotion but of an angsy obsessive desire and disrespectful of an already established couple.

Again, this is taking things under the perception that *everyone* knows the backstory of Scott and Jean when they saw the movies for the first time. They don't.
They also don't know Logan's backstory either. Far as they can tell he has no backstory, except for running around in the back woods of Alberta for 15 years taking on odd jobs and making do with whatever he can. No hint at complexities, past relationships, romance, or the ability to love there either. I see none of the complexities that you and others like you keep swearing by.

As far as Scott and Jean however, the audience doesn't need to know the full story. The fact that they are together and love each other and are engaged is enough. Logan's stuck fighting an uphill battle which he clearly loses by the end of X2. To simply try again simply because Scott's conveniently knocked out of the way is inappropriate and in bad taste, especially in light of the situation that they are in. And Jean never is seen to return his feelings. the last thing he yells to her before snikting her is "I love you". Does she ever return the feelings or say it back to him or hint at any way that she feels the same (hot makeout session while in Dark Phoenix persona doesn't count since it's obviously not Jean)? No.

I didn't realize they were engaged until I watched the behind-the-scenes features on the DVD.
Read the character bios on the movie websites. If that's not enough, check out some of the pictures of Jean. In some scenes, she's wearing what looks to me like a ring on that special finger.

From the perspective of someone not familiar with the comics, they were a couple in love, sure...but this undying love thing never quite played out the same way on screen.

The fact that Scott was willing to ride 2500 miles across country on a motorcycle to follow his faith and the way Jean was calling out to him for months begging for him to save her, not to mention the deveastation he felt at losing her and the sorrow and despair she felt at the moments of her death, to me is proof enough that it was a very deep love. As for not playing out as well as it could have on screen, that much is Obvious, since the writers got rid of Cyclops before he could even savor a kiss during a moment of his greatest joy and vindication with Jean in X3.
 
i feel like im invisible does anyone one even read my post or do you guys just browse for the next post from the three or four of you to continue your verbal sparring match if thats the case i can go else where
 
Iceman/Psylocke said:
Logan and Jean didn't really have the time to develop the bond that Scott and Jean could have had in the films.
:eek: What?! As I said before, it is as if Logan took Scotts emotions for Jean and claimed them ashis own....that ain't right..:cool:
 
x-fan said:
i feel like im invisible does anyone one even read my post or do you guys just browse for the next post from the three or four of you to continue your verbal sparring match if thats the case i can go else where

:confused:

you posted like 3 pages ago. What is it? go ahead Speak?

Is this another i like it as a what if thing? because not everyone feels that way. :)
 
undomiel said:
You're forgetting something -- this is a movies thread. I'm not concerned with what happened in the comics because they were telling a different story in the movies.

But I wonder whose is the more famed love story -- Romeo and Juliet (known throughout the world and has endured for centuries) or, say, Luke and Mara Jade (invented some time in the last few decades and whom I've never even heard of before this post)?

In my opinion, Jean and Scott make a very boring love story. Two nice, polite, well-educated people getting married. That's all fine in real life, but it doesn't make for a very interesting story, see? There's no tension. Sure, it may end happily-ever-after, but that's so Disney. I prefer a tragic love story, like the one we got with Jean and Logan.

You don't read the comic books huh? :)

Oh and Dark Pheonix story would of been just as tragic with Scott there :cyclops:
 
ntcrawler said:
Just trying to making a stand. Glad I'm not alone :)

But to tell you the truth, this whole debate seems pointless the way it's playing out. This thread is to let people post and let others know WHY THEY HATE WOLVERINE. There's nothing that can be really debated about a person's hatred, yet the suporters here keep trying to twist things around.

Just look how this thing is running in a circle:

Argument: I hate Wolverine
Counter: Why??? Wolverine is so lovable!
Argument: I hate the way he was portrayed in the film
Counter: But he did so many great things in the film! He's a hero! [squee!]
Argument: I hate the way he displaced other chars and took over their roles and did things that Wolverine would never do
Counter: But he's so popular! So that's what fans wanted to see!

This last argument is the one being posted here like a universal excuse, like it's going to explain and justify everything. And that's just it! Nothing the Wolverine fans said here so far justifies anything or is enough to change a person's mind. In fact, the statements they say, such as him being so popular that therefore he deserved to be front and center and smeared all over everything because he has *IT* is exactly what's making the haters hate him and the studio execs even more. Absolutely nothing that I've seen posted so far here could change a person's opinion, as it keeps going back to that universal excuse that he's the most popular and interesting and therefore what we got is what his fans wanted to see.k On the contrary. This argument is self-defeating because points out exactly why people hate him and are tired of the overexposure and hype that's clearly not going to stop anywhere in the near future.

I agree. There hasnt been a decent excuse in this thread for why wolverine can replace other characters and squash their importance. Its just the same "But hes popular!" excuse.
 
gambitfire said:
:confused:

you posted like 3 pages ago. What is it? go ahead Speak?

Is this another i like it as a what if thing? because not everyone feels that way. :)



i've actually posted afew times since then but thats cool
 
It must be your settings because i don't have a post of yours till like page 24and im on 26.

Anyways, that's beside the point WTH is it you want to say?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,377
Messages
22,094,290
Members
45,889
Latest member
Starman68
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"