Why the hate for Wolverine?

And to further add to this "xavier isnt a bastard" discussion, The beginning of the film sets what xavier did up perfectly. Did you see how little jean acted ? They said that they were like her and shes like pssh yeah right and just uses her powers like a toy... there was arrogance, there was impulsive use of powers. Now Xavier supposedly had the impression that her powers may become impossibly powerful as she gets an adult and she wouldnt be able to control them, which in turn would kill the entire population. So he decided to retroactively take some liberties to limit her powers and keep her in control, thus eventually creating a repressed personality. Malicious Xavier? hardly.

Makes sense to me. Better be safe than sorry.
 
BMM said:
Well, I don't find the X-Men to simply be breaking laws. A majority of the time they are reacting to an external threat that is happening to them, which is perhaps why they are hated, feared, and most of all, misunderstood.

I rest my case.. many just see his actions as can do no wrong.. its all exlainable... but what is he doing still? Hes breaking the laws, hes hiding criminal offenses etc. Hes a good man, that feels sometimes you have to break rules to get something done. And why is magneto so understandable? because theyre cut from the same mold, one more extreme than another... magneto also believes you need to do things for the greater good... more drastic things like rip a bridge apart with innocents to get to alcatraz.
 
XCharlieX said:
Well if you dont like that explanation tell me.. whats a prep school run By the ethically perfect charles xavier doing with a jet, an underground training area.. and whats more.. forming a task team that breaks the law every night by taking the law into their own hands? heh...

Very easy! On the surface, they try to educate mutants into controlling and using their powers in a responsible way, teach tolerance, and give them a chance at a better life. But there are mutants who WANT to hurt others, who choose the path of violence and who want to start a war for the sake of having a war and a world that lives in fear. Things that would only set the government off and turn public sentiment against mutants, and which would ultimately result in legislation like the Mutant Registration Act, mutant concentration camps, and mutant extermination.

It's far from a perfect world and it's something that Xavier would not have normally considered doing, but the best approach at the time was to create a mutant self-police force, a task force composed of people who would show the world that mutants can reel in and control and stop their own kind. Not only to prevent escalations and anger from the rest of the world, but also because they know that conventional law enforcement agencies as well as their tactics and weapons are incapable of standing up to certain mustants, especially like Magneto. They don't necessarily take the law into their own hands, but essentially fight to prevent a war, fight to prevent the situation from becoming out of control. They don't do it out of malicious intent, they don't do it as a joke, and they don't do it for a thrill or for fun. It's something they don't want to do and only do it as a last result when no other method will work. Justice is still left to conventional authorities, as shown by them turning Magneto over to federal forces who then lock him up in a specially designed but clearly government-run facility. Until the world can openly accept and tolerate mutants and understand the gravity of the situation as well as be able to respond in an understanding manner, this is unfortunately the next best thing.


His goal is a world where mutants and regular humans life side by side, where mutants can learn to cope and control their powers and use them for good. And Jean is his ultimate student and best inspiration to others
 
Yet again its shown that everyone thinks xavier cna do no wrong... remember x2? Stryker knew that a jet hidden in a prep school was illegal and would raise some flags. Thats what got the president all riled up who was sympathetic to mutants.

You can just think hes perfect and all, but this is the reason why the phoenix explanation didnt sit well with some. I guarantee it.
 
XCharlieX said:
And to further add to this "xavier isnt a bastard" discussion

This should be a thread title.

XCharlieX said:
The beginning of the film sets what xavier did up perfectly. Did you see how little jean acted ? They said that they were like her and shes like pssh yeah right and just uses her powers like a toy... there was arrogance, there was impulsive use of powers. Now Xavier supposedly had the impression that her powers may become impossibly powerful as she gets an adult and she wouldnt be able to control them, which in turn would kill the entire population. So he decided to retroactively take some liberties to limit her powers and keep her in control, thus eventually creating a repressed personality. Malicious Xavier? hardly.

I don't think it maintains malicious intent, but I do find it to be cruel, especially for Jean.

Makes sense to me. Better be safe than sorry.

Haha. Well, Jean gets short changed on this one. She gets stabbed and dies again while Xavier lies comfortably in bed next to Moira.
 
He didnt exactly get a walk in the park in jeans house ;)

And Magneto changing for x3... some have said he was a 2d character... i doubt it. All along he was ready to fight the battle of Us vs Them. He was revved up and ready to strike in x3, with his simple ideology being all he needed in toe for war. I found it well done.

Just like stryker says simplistically " this already is a war and he is the enemy".
 
XCharlieX said:
Yet again its shown that everyone thinks xavier cna do no wrong... remember x2? Stryker knew that a jet hidden in a prep school was illegal and would raise some flags.

Obviously, since it's illegal for civilians to own stealth aircraft. but he used that more of an excuse to get the president's blessing to invade the place, not out of concern for Xavier violating FAA regulations. Xavier didn't get the jet because he's evil or trying to break the law. That may be "wrong" as far as breaking US law, but it does not show the character as being bad or evil. Certainly has nothing to do with his role in running the school or being a father figure and leader and certainly would not prevent him from being more compassionate and handle Jean's situation better.
utants.

You can just think hes perfect and all, but this is the reason why the phoenix explanation didnt sit well with some. I guarantee it.

Some people also don't mind these characters having a sudden change for the dark side or dying because they consider these chars to be disposable and don't mind seeing gravestones at the end of the movie. Others don't consider them to be as disposablee
 
XCharlieX said:
And to further add to this "xavier isnt a bastard" discussion, The beginning of the film sets what xavier did up perfectly. Did you see how little jean acted ? They said that they were like her and shes like pssh yeah right and just uses her powers like a toy...

Well yeah. This wasn't a point in time where mutants were either known or common. Seeing that jean was able to effortlessly lift up all the neighbor's cars, why SHOULDN't she think she was one of a kind? Especially since there were no known cases or news reports of anyone coming even close to her ability? Then again, who else wouldn's use that line? I could see Cyclops saying the exact same things t to Xavier's "we're mutants just like you", not to mention Bobby Drake, Marie, hell even Magneto. Oh you're a mutant just like me? I doubt that...

there was arrogance, there was impulsive use of powers.

I wouldn't call it impulsive. She's not shown as having caused a trail of destruction otherwise 1/2 the city would be after her at this point. She also walked down the stairs, not floated down as befitting a child showing off and lording herself in her own majesty. The fact that the neighbors either didn't freak out or acted like they've seen this before shows that she at least had some level of control over her abilities, and her parents having some degree of control over her, as parents. I also didn't see any flaming wreckages or houses knocked off their foundation in the neighborhood. And her parents were very calm and not hysterical about Jean or her condition.

Makes sense to me. Better be safe than sorry.

Well the version of Xavier that they want us to see in X3 was certainly very wrong, and ended up being very very sorry. X1 and X2's Xavier wouldn't allow something like this to happen or for the situation to deteriorate to the point that it had.

Remember what Jean told Logan in X1:

"he's teaching me to develop my powers"

And that's the key word here. Develop. Not "control my powers", not "holding back my powers", not "restricting my powers". Nothing of the sort. She makes it clear that he powers interesting but not world-destructive and that Xavier is teaching her to make them stronger. There is never any dialogue to suggest or imply that Xavier is holding her back and only giving her powers back to her in small doses as X3 tries to suggest. This whole concept was never alluded to or hinted at and was essentially pulled out of a hat in X3. Jean even as a young girl had a clear idea of what she was capable of "20 years ago" and she would obviously know that Xavier did something if her ability was suddenly reduced to manipulating books or test tubes. The fact that she never suggested or discussed with anyone - especially Scott - that her mental blocks were going haywire and her powrs set lose indicates that there was never such a thing in place. Another example of where X3 clearly deviates from concepts established in the first 2 films.
 
ntcrawler said:
Xavier didn't get the jet because he's evil or trying to break the law. That may be "wrong" as far as breaking US law, but it does not show the character as being bad or evil. Certainly has nothing to do with his role in running the school or being a father figure and leader and certainly would not prevent him from being more compassionate and handle Jean's situation better.

None of his actions were evil, including the phoenix. Theres a connection there to those that accepted what they did. If no connection is what you want to believe, nothing anyone can do. I just dont think those fans really have a platform to diss x3, because many got it and truly are wonderign what these fans are possibly on about, found nothing wrong with it and can support their arguments, there had to be something to it if what you state sounds nuts to them even imo lol.
 
XCharlieX said:
None of his actions were evil, including the phoenix.

No I'm saying that those two things (thr strike team, stealth jet), etc shouldn't be connected with his treatment of Jean. Xavier's approach to Jean was cowardly and smothering, not befitting a man of his wisdom and compassion which after seeing X1 and X2 we believe he is supposed to have and based on which we know he could have handled the situation better, which is why we feel that his portrayal in X3 was therefore inconsistent with the first two tilms. You may consider it an interesting plot twist that he's suddenly flawed and has a dark side. we consider it to be a portray that is incorrect and wrong, and one that is not in keeping with X1 and X2. The fact that no one else in the fiction community picked up on this idea before the film came out gives a strong hint that X3's concept was not only not seen as coming, but also that it was not what was originally intended.


nothing wrong with it and can support their arguments, there had to be something to it if what you state sounds nuts to them even imo lol.

You can call me nuts, but I'm not the only one. There are enough people who agree with me and presented a wide variation of alternate takes on X3 and Xavier's role and treatment of Jean, none of which show the same conclusions or results as portrayed in X3. We've also given what we consider to be reasonable explanations for why we feel this way and why in fact Xavier's actions in X3 are not reasonable or inconsisent. So I hardly feel that would qualify us as being nuts. To suddenly turn Xavier into a panicky, smothering, arrogant man who talks down to people and offers no explanations? And who does things which does nothing but to make Jean become angry and go berzerk? That's nuts, LOL
 
ntcrawler said:
You can call me nuts, but I'm not the only one.

I said the argument was a bit nuts to the people who understood, not you. This type of stuff happens all the time with controversial sequels or films with much doubt before it... people just dont get whats in the films when it arrives and some do. Thats the thing about creativity, when you move a certain direction you close other doors and someone somewhere wont like it. Not my place to say you must change ur view.

ntcrawler said:
And who does things which does nothing but to make Jean become angry and go berzerk? That's nuts, LOL

What i find more nuts is Brett Ratners decision with pacing... ;)
 
XCharlieX said:
I rest my case.. many just see his actions as can do no wrong.. its all exlainable... but what is he doing still? Hes breaking the laws, hes hiding criminal offenses etc. Hes a good man, that feels sometimes you have to break rules to get something done.

Well, my assertion in my posts isn't that Xavier can do no wrong. I don't believe he is an infallibe, perfectly gentle old man. He certainly isn't portrayed as an always amiable guy. The only issue regarding his characterization that I found conflicting are some of his personal creedos regarding mutancy.
 
BMM said:
Well, my assertion in my posts isn't that Xavier can do no wrong. I don't believe he is an infallibe, perfectly gentle old man. He certainly isn't portrayed as an always amiable guy. The only issue regarding his characterization that I found conflicting are some of his personal creedos regarding mutancy.

Well, for me, i have theories as to why some type of folks didnt accept it just as you have theories on why people are liking x3. That really is that. The discussion really is repeating now lol Some liked x3, others didnt, but the fact that so many die hards that have payed close attention to the other films found this idea to be knowledgeable of the previous films and well done means it really doesnt mean the idea was nonsense, poorly done or a bastardization or such, just that it was controversial. Thats really all i have to say on this.
 
XCharlieX said:
Well, for me, i have theories as to why some type of folks didnt accept it just as you have theories on why people are liking x3. That really is that. The discussion really is repeating now lol Some liked x3, others didnt, but the fact that so many die hards that have payed close attention to the other films found this idea to be knowledgeable of the previous films and well done means it really doesnt mean the idea was nonsense or a bastardization or such, just that it was controversial. Thats really all i have to say on this.

Oh no, I don't think it was a bastardization or nonsense. I just didn't find it particularly well done.
 
The idea of Xavier's 'meddling' and mental blocks was discussed on here long ago....and our former Phoenix expert AlmightyPejo was among those putting forward the idea. I wonder what he thought of the flow/continuity between all three movies - shame he isn't around any more on here.

A story where people have motives and secrets (thus creating the conflict vital to any dramatic piece) is much better than a story in which one person faces their own personal struggle... which is why Jean's experiences and changes in X2 were a sub-plot to the main Stryker plot. Seeing Stryker's motives played out were more dramatic than seeing Jean's headaches and power burnouts.

So, I wasn't surprised when the Phoenix arc became a secondary plot in X3.

What Bryan Singer would have done will never truly be known. Even if he says what his plans were, there is no knowing what would have been in his finished version of X3 after Fox had their say with parameters etc.

Jean simply coming back as a super-powered goodie adds no conflict to the story...there is no socio-political, wider issue attached to the 'sudden leap' of one individual... She'd have to turn bad and wreak some havoc in order to trigger government action (cure, or registration act, or sentinels).
 
X-Maniac said:
Jean simply coming back as a super-powered goodie adds no conflict to the story...there is no socio-political, wider issue attached to the 'sudden leap' of one individual... She'd have to turn bad and wreak some havoc in order to trigger government action (cure, or registration act, or sentinels).

I disagree and we already discussed this. Jean coming back as basically good but with Phoenix level powers would provide plenty of interesting conflicts and complications to the storyline. If done intelligently, an author could throw her into a situation where her powers alone, no matter how strong cannot save the day. If you're still wondering how this could be done, then I stronly suggest you read Minisinoo's novel "Grail". You will also see that it's also not necessary to kill off 1/2 the cast to add drama, and no reason why Jean has to turn back and wreak havoc for no reason in order to trigger government action. And finally you will also see that it's not necessary to give Xavier a dark past or involve mental blocks or manipulations to make him an interesting character as well.

As Jean says to Warren and Scott: "lean to think outside the box" :)
 
BMM said:
Danoyse, this may not strictly be in response to your above post. I quoted it, but after typing, I'm not sure how much of it applies. I guess it is more of a response to some of the things that I have been reading over the past of couple of pages. I don't want you to think that I am trying to put words into your mouth.

Oh, don't worry...it's all open to interpretation. :)



I don't find the two situations regarding Jean Grey and Wolverine to be the same, which contributes to the reasons I do find Xavier to be out of character in The Last Stand. Xavier’s actions and motivations regarding Jean Grey are contrived, manipulative, pre-conceived and in the end, hurtful. This is not the case for Wolverine. Wolverine’s amnesia is not a result of Xavier’s actions. Likewise, it is not Xavier’s responsibility to simply solve Wolverine’s problems, nor does he. This a personal task suited for Wolverine and Wolverine alone. A psychiatrist/psychologist may know or realize the cause of a patient’s trauma, and although the psychologist may guide and help his patient come to a resolution, it is important that the patient come to his own resolution (a la a breakthrough). This is what Xavier is doing for Wolverine, and he is right in doing so. On a side note, I don’t believe Magneto is indicating that Xavier knew who Wolverine was before X-Men. I think Magneto is simply distorting what he believes are Xavier’s past failures (Jason) in an attempt to be hurtful.

I don’t find Xavier to be manipulating Wolverine in an effort to keep him as a member of the team. If he was, I don’t believe he would have let Wolverine go so easily at the end of X-Men. Also, I don’t find Magneto and Xavier’s speech in the prison in X2 to be a reflection of Xavier’s character. Rather, I find it to be a reflection of Magneto’s. Xavier states “Logan’s mind is still fragile” (and indeed it is) to which Magneto retorts, “Is it? Or are you afraid of losing one of your precious X-Men?” Magneto’s line is cowardly. It is an attempt to distract Xavier from the true matter at hand—Magneto has betrayed Xavier and does not want to admit it. Xavier is visibly hurt by Magneto’s fallacious insult, because despite how misguided Magneto’s ideals may be, Xavier considers him a friend, and does not believe Eric would stoop so low so as to pervert the sincerity of Xavier’s life long motivations simply for the means of a quick insult. This is what I gather from the disappointed look on Xavier’s face . . . but this look is soon replaced with one of shock when he realizes what Magneto is actually trying to cover up.

I don't think the two situations are exactly the same, either. Xavier had known since Jean since she was a child, he was the one that molded/altered her telepathy and personality. In a sense, he'd had control over her for most of her life. Whereas Wolverine, we're not really sure how much Xavier knew. Like you said, he didn't give him his amnesia. Jean even points out that "he may very well be older than you, Professor," which means that Wolverine's past is something that has always been well out of his control.

We just knew how much he was willing to give him about his past before letting him find out the rest himself. He even told him that if he read his mind again, "the results would be the same," basically telling Logan there was nothing else that he could find. In the prison scene, we found out Xavier knew much more and hid that from Logan. How would Wolverine had reacted if he ever found out that Xavier was holding things back from him? Probably the same way he reacted when he learned about Jean's mental blocks.

But I do think the scene in the prison was a shot at Xavier's tactics. You can see in X3 that they disagreed about the way Jean's mutation was handled. "One of his precious X-Men" could very well have been a reference to Jean as well as the current situation with Logan. Obviously, there were more important matters at hand in that scene, but at the same time...Xavier didn't have an answer for that.

When I saw X3 the first time, it did throw me to see Xavier lose his cool the way he did in the infirmary. But I didn't think it completely threw out his character from the first two...mainly because in the first two movies he was always getting incapacitated or captured for entire chunks of the movie where you didn't get to see him really lead the rest of the X-Men in a crisis situation. He really hadn't had scenes with Jean in either of the movies, so you know there was a lot about their relationship that was unknown, and it was open to just about anything in X3.


Furthermore, I find that the same prison conversation speaks volumes regarding Xavier’s character. In reference to Stryker’s son, Xavier states, “I wasn’t able to help him. At least not in the way his father wanted.” This notion regarding Xavier’s resolve is further displayed later in X2. Xavier rebukes Stryker, stating, “William, you wanted me to cure your son, but mutation is not a disease.” Moreover, Stryker notes that Xavier was more afraid of Jason than he was. Despite this fear, Xavier still refused to give Jason and his father an easy way out. Xavier’s convictions are strong. I find these examples to be especially relevant concerning Xavier’s unwavering principles, which is why I find his characterization in The Last Stand to be unsound.

Again, I think Jason was also psychotic, and it was something Xavier couldn't help. Stryker saw them as one and the same, and wouldn't agree with Xavier when he said he couldn't make that better. Xavier blocked Jean's telepathy, he didn't make it go away. Perhaps he couldn't.

Whatever had happened...Jason was later used as a tool to make Xavier destroy millions of lives. I'd have to think that after an experience like that, he would be so uncharacteristically adamant about the steps he took upon Jean's return to block her telepathy, and not be so patient about whatever Logan had to say about it.

Stryker had that relationship with Xavier, plus everything he had mined from Magneto. You saw in the scene where Mystique is at his computer that he had tons of files on all of the mutants--how much did he get from Magneto? He told him enough about Cerebro that it's entirely possible he'd unwillingly told Stryker how Charles was able to block the powers of a mutant as dangerous as Jean. And if that was true, why couldn't he have done the same for his own son?

I don’t find Xavier’s actions in The Last Stand to follow previous logic nor do I find it matches his previous characterization. As is noted in the above conversation, Xavier’s actions regarding Jean Grey completely conflict with the convictions of his prior incarnations. In The Last Stand, Xavier is deceitful and manipulative. He fears Jean, and in an attempt to quell her power, he fragments her mind, which ultimately ruins both of their lives (not to mention puts a serious dent in Xavier’s honesty and trustworthiness thereby questioning the sincerity of his motivations regarding his dream—and that kind of deviation is a problem). To make matters worse, he continues to subversively manipulate Jean throughout the rest of her life. Perhaps I would find this newly revealed insight better if I didn’t think it conflicted with everything established in X-Men and X2, particularly his measures concerning Jason and Wolverine.

And still, I didn't there was enough about Xavier's relationship with Jean in the first two movies for his behavior in X3 to be so totally out of line. Shocking and deceitful, yes...but not quite tossing everything else out the window either.

We were joking during Magneto's speech in the forest, with Jean alongside him, that he was in wayyyyy over his head here. Which to us, kind of validated why the professor took the steps that he did. The problem was we didn't know enough about what was happening to Jean to know who was doing the right thing.

I think The Last Stand would like to think itself clever by trying to imbue the situation with a sense of irony, but instead I find it to be the result of sloppy storytelling in an attempt to side-step an otherwise potentially difficult explanation of the Phoenix (or one that didn’t fit the pre-ordained parameters of the story). Xavier’s revelations are quick blurbs in the movie and they don’t seem to fit well to me. I could do my best to spin the scenes in an attempt at making the movies coalesce, but I don’t find them to fit the honesty or tone of the characterizations in the previous installments. The genuineness of Xavier’s principles as shared with Magneto in scenes such as those previously mentioned don’t mesh well with the explanations given in The Last Stand. Xavier’s beliefs regarding Jason/Wolverine and Jean are polar opposites to me, and I don’t find that one lends itself to the other.


The thing was, according to the movies...there were no parameters. You literally had to watch X1 with the commentary track on to know that the fleeting glance Jean gives at the end of the Liberty Island scene was the beginning of her transformation. You saw her powers evolving in X2, but there was no clear explanation of what was happening--except that she couldn't control them. Xavier and Jean didn't even have scenes together to discuss what was happening.

What you did know in the first two movies was that Xavier had held things back from Logan about his past. He'd had a student that he couldn't help, who later used him to kill millions. Now Jean is back with what he knows are catostrophically dangerous powers, and he's trying to block them and not care if anyone else thinks less of him for it.

It was always an ongoing argument between him and Magneto. I think if Wolverine had come to Magneto first, Magneto would have told him everything he wanted to know to get him on his side. But Xavier got to him first, and I'm sure that definitely ticked off Magneto enough to take the potshots he did in the prison scene. They're both incredibly manipulative.
 
ntcrawler said:
I disagree and we already discussed this. Jean coming back as basically good but with Phoenix level powers would provide plenty of interesting conflicts and complications to the storyline. If done intelligently, an author could throw her into a situation where her powers alone, no matter how strong cannot save the day. If you're still wondering how this could be done, then I stronly suggest you read Minisinoo's novel "Grail". You will also see that it's also not necessary to kill off 1/2 the cast to add drama, and no reason why Jean has to turn back and wreak havoc for no reason in order to trigger government action. And finally you will also see that it's not necessary to give Xavier a dark past or involve mental blocks or manipulations to make him an interesting character as well.

As Jean says to Warren and Scott: "lean to think outside the box" :)

Yes, we did talk about it before, that's true. But for her to be doing 'good' deeds and then turn 'bad' in the space of one movie might be pushing it a little. We'd need to see some good action sequences of 'good Jean' saving the day and somehow turning 'bad.' I can't quite see it working within the timeframe of a 90minute movie. And it might seem like a repeat of parts of X2 where Jean saves the day but something is happening to her, something uncontrollable (this sounds like when she couldn't stop the second missile, when she almost fried Nightcrawler's mind when telepathically probing for the location of Stryker's base, when she had no more strength to stop the water).

I can, therefore, understand why X3 took the route it did, by using her apparent death at the end of X2 (the shutdown of her conscious mind into comatose state) as the point at which darkness could fight for full control. I must add that I can understand this even though I would have preferred somehow to see more of good Phoenix and some of the darned firebird! Do you see what I mean here?

The events of X2 in which the most powerful telepath on the planet was quite easily manipulated into almost killing everyone on the planet also serves as a reminder of what can be done with a mind when the person isn't in control. It is, in a way, a justification for what Xavier did to Jean with the mental blocks. In a way, it's a shame that wasn't mentioned, with Charles saying something like: 'I had to control her, look what happened to me when i was not in control of my powers, I almost killed everyone on the planet.'

I almost wonder sometimes if they hadn't originally intended Jean to be Stryker's captive in X2 and to be the one who was manipulated (and corrupted, as she was more fragile)...
 
Post for Danoys:

are you saying Magneto let Stryker get him?

Honestly i don't think he had a choice.
 
ntcrawler said:
Well yeah. This wasn't a point in time where mutants were either known or common. Seeing that jean was able to effortlessly lift up all the neighbor's cars, why SHOULDN't she think she was one of a kind? Especially since there were no known cases or news reports of anyone coming even close to her ability? Then again, who else wouldn's use that line? I could see Cyclops saying the exact same things t to Xavier's "we're mutants just like you", not to mention Bobby Drake, Marie, hell even Magneto. Oh you're a mutant just like me? I doubt that...



I wouldn't call it impulsive. She's not shown as having caused a trail of destruction otherwise 1/2 the city would be after her at this point. She also walked down the stairs, not floated down as befitting a child showing off and lording herself in her own majesty. The fact that the neighbors either didn't freak out or acted like they've seen this before shows that she at least had some level of control over her abilities, and her parents having some degree of control over her, as parents. I also didn't see any flaming wreckages or houses knocked off their foundation in the neighborhood. And her parents were very calm and not hysterical about Jean or her condition.



Well the version of Xavier that they want us to see in X3 was certainly very wrong, and ended up being very very sorry. X1 and X2's Xavier wouldn't allow something like this to happen or for the situation to deteriorate to the point that it had.

Remember what Jean told Logan in X1:

"he's teaching me to develop my powers"

And that's the key word here. Develop. Not "control my powers", not "holding back my powers", not "restricting my powers".


and wolverine in the deleted scene asks her ar you sure he isn't holding you back so there is a hint that there could be something more. also have we considered thet professor x was under abit of stress maybe even very concerne with her well being and thus snapped at logan we can all act out of character given the right cercumstances.
 
I have to add to this too that there is precedent for the use of Xavier's mental blocks in the comicbooks. When she first joined the X-Men, Jean was only telekinetic; her telepathy emerged later. We were much later told (in a retcon origin) that Xavier had blocked off her telepathy.

Further to that, when Jean became Phoenix her power kept shutting down at the worst possible moments (such as when she fought Magneto). These power shutdowns happened during X2, when she couldn't stop the second missile. In the comics, Moira MacTaggert studied her and found that the shutdowns were caused by Jean's mind erecting 'psionic circuit breakers' because her power was too extreme and excessive for her to handle. When she fought Xavier as Dark Phoenix, Xavier (with the help of good Jean) restored the psionic circuit breakers to contain her power. She burst free of them again shortly afterwards: the Shi'ar demanded that Phoenix pay for her crimes in consuming a sun and to resolve the matter the X-Men and Imperial Guard had to fight each other.

Bearing all that in mind, and considering the already-different Phoenix saga elements vaguely offered in X1 and X2 (like the 'odd look' she had at the Statue of Liberty), I don't find the elements of the Phoenix saga in X3 to be a jolt from either the comicbook lore or the unexpressed/unexplained/understated/underdeveloped Phoenix-related events that appeared in previous movies.

Her speech at the end of X2 about evolution taking a sudden leap could be interpreted to mean that she had always been that evolutionary leap (since childhood), not necessarily that she took that leap at that particular moment. Or it could be that, at the moment of her mind shutting down as the water rushed over her, the mental barriers were gone and her mind expanded back to what it would have been if the blocks had not been there. A rush of power that she was unable to handle in X3.

Not how everyone might see it, but it seems pretty valid.
 
gambitfire said:
Post for Danoys:

are you saying Magneto let Stryker get him?

Honestly i don't think he had a choice.

No, not at all. Magneto never would have let Stryker get Xavier or the school. Everything he told Styker, he was forced to tell.
 
Ah now its "phoenix can carry an entire x men film" eh wtf... X-Maniac , ill ally you in this debate.

New reply in mins....
 
X-Maniac said:
The events of X2 in which the most powerful telepath on the planet was quite easily manipulated into almost killing everyone on the planet also serves as a reminder of what can be done with a mind when the person isn't in control. It is, in a way, a justification for what Xavier did to Jean with the mental blocks. In a way, it's a shame that wasn't mentioned, with Charles saying something like: 'I had to control her, look what happened to me when i was not in control of my powers, I almost killed everyone on the planet.'

I almost wonder sometimes if they hadn't originally intended Jean to be Stryker's captive in X2 and to be the one who was manipulated (and corrupted, as she was more fragile)...

Exactly. How frightening was it for Xavier to realize that he himself had been used to nearly kill millions? And Magneto was the one who'd gotten Jason to turn him from killing mutants to killing humans instead.

Now with Magneto on the run, and with a mutant as powerful as Jean having resurfaced (with Magneto knowing full well what she's capable of), why wouldn't he be so insistent of restoring those mental blocks as quickly as possible? Was he trying to protect himself, as well as Jean?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,273
Messages
22,078,369
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"