Will Hulk be leaping and running fast in the movie?

[SuperNewGuy]

Griping because the jumping is unrealistic? We're talking about a guy who turns into a green monster when he gets pissed off, I don't think this is a movie based on reality.

 

[Spade]

Hahahahaha....it's funny how they try to stereotype me as a hardcore fan when I was the one who liked the growth, the 15 ft. size, and the Hulk dog concept. Yeah...it's pretty funny when people have to resort to lowest common denominator just to try and prove a nonexistent point.

 

[HulkStomps!]

The Hulk MUST run fast and leap! I think too many people take for granted Hulk's ability because of his size. In many of the comics people were always saying, "How can someone so big move so fast?!" Naturally if Hulk can leap up to 5 miles or so in length, and lift 100+ tons, his OWN weight wouldn't even register to him! So he weighs about 1500 lbs. To him (Hulk), that's nothing! Think about it.

 

[Riddick2009]

The Hulk MUST run fast and leap! I think too many people take for granted Hulk's ability because of his size. In many of the comics people were always saying, "How can someone so big move so fast?!" Naturally if Hulk can leap up to 5 miles or so in length, and lift 100+ tons, his OWN weight wouldn't even register to him! So he weighs about 1500 lbs. To him (Hulk), that's nothing! Think about it.

Great point!

 

[Riddick2009]

OK i mispelled a word, big deal.

My point is your in no position to be talking about what's realistic or not. Nano-technology exists but you were fine with it creating a fictional character like the HULK...who is the dictionary definition of unrealistic.

It's funny how you changed your post from saying ''I misspelled a bunch of words'' to ''So I miss spelled a bunch of words, big deal'' getting a little touchy aren't we, I was nice enough to change my post and erase that when I said you can't spell, you changed yours to be a smart ass, how nice of you.

 

[Dew k. Mosi]

Play nice children or Mama will spank

 

[Riddick2009]

haha

 

[November Rain]

I'm actually quite surprised that people want a hulk film with no leaping at all or no running.

It's like having a transformers movie with no transforming.



YOu can never please hulk fans. Some want man in paint but those very same people wanting him outclassing superman and lifting up mountains and stuff but don't want him jumping.

it's quite clear you guys are impossible to please.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

like i said earlier... hulk should run.. i have no problem with that... and i honestly don't care if he leaps or not, but if he does... it shouldnt look like it did in HULK, keep it a bit lower to the ground, because it looked almost like flying in HULK, hulk shouldnt be in the clouds

 

[November Rain]

he was quite clearly not flying, he was using his arms to stabalise and also directing himself with his feet. he was pretty much never in the horizontal typical flying position.

maybe there should have been more destruction on every impact he made with the ground but i guess they wanted to also show he had finesse

unfortunately, that's just the way the hulk has been portrayed to jump. He doesn't take off with one foot which is more likely to give him less hight and more length (like a long jumper) because that means a constant slowing down of momentum. He uses two footed jumps he can use continuously which give him the increased height and also the increased distance if he is jumping in a parabola form. It also the jump that utilises the most of the body's natural resources with arms being fully used as well and most of all gives the most drammatic scene on film.


a hulk that doesn't run or jump is simply a smaller scaled kong.

 

[dark_b]

i am more scared about the movement of the hulk.

 

[antsiou]

http://www.incrediblehulk.com/powersabilities.html

Leaping/Jumping Ability
The Hulks's leg muscles are augmented so much that the Hulk can travel miles in a single casual jump. Jumping is the standard mode of transportation for the less intelligent incarnations of the Hulk. The Hulk has been known to make it into the earth's atmosphere on a single leap. Given the strength of the leap and the angle of trajectory when landing, the Hulk can create large craters and limited seismic activity when landing.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

he was quite clearly not flying, he was using his arms to stabalise and also directing himself with his feet. he was pretty much never in the horizontal typical flying position.

maybe there should have been more destruction on every impact he made with the ground but i guess they wanted to also show he had finesse

unfortunately, that's just the way the hulk has been portrayed to jump. He doesn't take off with one foot which is more likely to give him less hight and more length (like a long jumper) because that means a constant slowing down of momentum. He uses two footed jumps he can use continuously which give him the increased height and also the increased distance if he is jumping in a parabola form. It also the jump that utilises the most of the body's natural resources with arms being fully used as well and most of all gives the most drammatic scene on film.


a hulk that doesn't run or jump is simply a smaller scaled kong.

thats what made him silly, i rember being in the audience and hearing people LAUGH...

what you just described is gliding by the way, pretty damb close to flying
plus, you don't have to be in a "superman" position to fly...

 

[spideyboy_1111]

i am more scared about the movement of the hulk.

me 2, i honestly had no problem with cg hulk, he was just to big and a lil 2 neon green

 

[November Rain]

well you pretty much have to be if you are going long distances.

that only happens anywho in one scene where he has the wind in his face and his eyes are closed and you just see that he is in his element.

that scene lasted less than 8 seconds...Is that really enough time to depict something as wrong and non effective?

 

[spideyboy_1111]

well you pretty much have to be if you are going long distances.

that only happens anywho in one scene where he has the wind in his face and his eyes are closed and you just see that he is in his element.

that scene lasted less than 8 seconds...Is that really enough time to depict something as wrong and non effective?

my point is... it broke me... ME... (someone who, hell, likes to some degree every marvel movie... and has defended some parts in many of the movies others call the weakest, dont get me wrong i enjoyed hulk) from reality and the serious tone the movie was giving, i can't imagine what those who laughed were thinking. It just didnt look right, and i knew hulk jumped i wasnt ingorant on that subject. The part in the clouds just looked very akward. so i say put a slight constraint on his jumps, keep em lower and a bit shorter distances... but not to low and short, he shouldnt look like a bunny rabbit. and they should also utilize his running more...

 

[November Rain]

but he's only in the clouds for like 3 seconds and considering he's jumping from a mountain range and not the ground, how can that not be deemed acceptible.

it's not like he ever jumped from the ground right up to the clouds.

I don't see why that would be a problem personally

 

[spideyboy_1111]

but he's only in the clouds for like 3 seconds and considering he's jumping from a mountain range and not the ground, how can that not be deemed acceptible.

it's not like he ever jumped from the ground right up to the clouds.

I don't see why that would be a problem personally

obviously

 

[November Rain]

well explain yourself instead of coming across defensively.

you've been on the hype to know saying something like 'it didn't look right' isn't a justified enough explanation.

I've just watched the scene numerous times on youtube and i cant personally see a problem with that cloud footage, it is on for like four seconds max. his eyes are closed, he is experiencing lots of winds and he's that high for only a moment because he's in mountainous region. his body is going from a more streamlined approach to a landing position, arms are being used for balance.

just after that clip, there is an aerial view below cloud level showing hulk doing shorter jumps (vertically and horizontally) and also incorporating running.

so why does it take you out, it's right before the xena-esque music singing starts which i can see making people laugh, or is that the scene you speak of..

here's the video.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

im just saying, it looked too high, too slow paced.. and simply just came off akward. i don't know how to explain it more then that

 

[spideyboy_1111]

his jumping should just simply stay like his first jump is in that clip

 

[November Rain]

but a similar scene happened in spiderman 2 right before spidey fell for the second time at night. Were people also laughing then?

it's virtually the same perspective shot.


are you also against this shot then?

print screen the footage and take me through it.

 

[spideyboy_1111]

2nd one is a tad bit too long in air time, the long stuff just makes it akward imo

and the 3rd jump and jumps leading up to the "fly" just looks silly.. hes like a cartoon bouncing around like a fly in a glass cage, looks wierd

so keep it like the first jump and it's fine with me

 

[November Rain]

his jumping should just simply stay like his first jump is in that clip

so a really long run up than a take off...stop and start again or land running and repeat?

no hops

 

[spideyboy_1111]

but a similar scene happened in spiderman 2 right before spidey fell for the second time at night. Were people also laughing then?

it's virtually the same perspective shot.


are you also against this shot then?

print screen the footage and take me through it.

spidey also swings on webs... hanging off of buildings in NYC... its his trade mark, hulks jumps are not a trademark... (thats his strength and anger and color) hulks jumps are more like movie spideys spider sense (that seems to be rarely used) or maybe more appropriately his current (in comic) stingers and night vision most people dont know about it, and would find it akward to see period