eh. I still prefer this over other x-men action shots in this franchise:The acting/dialogue aren't very good.

Much more dynamic and intense above compared to......this below. Ugh:


eh. I still prefer this over other x-men action shots in this franchise:The acting/dialogue aren't very good.
Apples and oranges imoeh. I still prefer this over other x-men action shots in this franchise:
![]()
Much more dynamic and intense above compared to......this below. Ugh:
![]()
![]()
Yea I think everyone got that...I think they’re comparing the shot from a Dark Phoenix to both of the shots of magneto below from Apocalypse.
Isn't the shot of Magneto in the first Apocalypse GIF suppose to be above his full force since he's boosted by Apocalypse? He's not floating down in that shot.....and yet it's still shot so dull. "LMAO" The point is both Apocalypse shots are dull and uninteresting.I mean why are you even comparing a shot of Magneto at his full force with a shot of him floating down? LMAO
Yea I think everyone got that...
I mean why are you even comparing a shot of Magneto at his full force with a shot of him floating down? LMAO
I still prefer the way that's shot. It's just more believable & still manages to create tension and intensity as oppose to this:Apples and oranges imo
That Dark Phoenix snippet looks like a fan film. The unsteady camera, the non descript green field, the drab civilian clothes.There's nothing dynamic about that shot. Just because it's better compared to the blue screen horror that is Apocalypse doesn't mean it's good.
I still prefer the way that's shot. It's just more believable & still manages to create tension and intensity as oppose to this:
![]()
Unsteady camera reminds me a lot of Civil War and Winter Soldier, which I liked a lot. Those films also had action scenes in civilian clothes....where some of the action took place in regular streets. I don't see the problem. This still look better to me than all the blue screen nonsense in Apocalypse, which I utterly could not stand.That Dark Phoenix snippet looks like a fan film. The unsteady camera, the non descript green field, the drab civilian clothes.
The indoor shots seem to fare far better, to me. But still Singer-lite.
Amen.On the other hand, it's a crying shame that McAvoy and Fassbender won't be in the MCU.
At least the overact is interesting. I was utterly bored with his scenes in Egypt. And he looked bored. The camera usage was boring and lazy. Even the Auschwitz shot was better than his shots in Egypt.So you expect Fassy to overact as Apocalypse's Horseman to show his full force? That makes sense to you?
You two very well know there's a more (to paraphrase carpenter's reply) "apples to apples"-comparable shot of Magneto exerting more effort using his powers earlier in that movie in Auschwitz right? Fassbender is doing the same over-acting thing there as he is in this Genosha shot that you apparently love so much. But it probably doesn't fit with your narrative.
At least be intellectually honest.
Every poster is here. I'd assume they're high quality.Anyone be and UHQ/HQ images of any of the posters??
You two very well know there's a more (to paraphrase carpenter's reply) "apples to apples"-comparable shot of Magneto exerting more effort using his powers earlier in that movie in Auschwitz right? Fassbender is doing the same over-acting thing there as he is in this Genosha shot that you apparently love so much. But it probably doesn't fit with your narrative.
At least be intellectually honest.
If you want me to say this looks on the same level as those, I won't because I don't see it. And I also believe there are Youtube videos complaining about the drab, concrete look of those movies. They did have the excuse of making it like a spy thriller, especially with Civil War being a Manchurian Candidate riff.Unsteady camera reminds me a lot of Civil War and Winter Soldier, which I liked a lot. Those films also had action scenes in civilian clothes....where some of the action took place in regular streets. I don't see the problem. This still look better to me than all the blue screen nonsense in Apocalypse, which I utterly could not stand.
At least be intellectually honest.
They probably think it’s going to fail , so more viewings for other movies to make more money.Anyone know why my local theater would only have 2 screenings for Dark Phoenix on the 6th? Would they just not have updated yet? Really don't want to go to a 6:15pm screening.
Anyone know why my local theater would only have 2 screenings for Dark Phoenix on the 6th? Would they just not have updated yet? Really don't want to go to a 6:15pm screening.
The look of those movies never bother me. I preferred the change in look. That's part of the reason why there among some of my top MCU films.If you want me to say this looks on the same level as those, I won't because I don't see it. And I also believe there are Youtube videos complaining about the drab, concrete look of those movies. They did have the excuse of making it like a spy thriller, especially with Civil War being a Manchurian Candidate riff.
If anything it seems they are more attempting to emulate Logan rather than those, but again it felt like Logan's cinematography and action looked better based on the footage of Dark Phoenix so far.
Ehhhhh....I don't agree. You can still shoot a much more dynamic scene utilizing lots of CGI much better than what Apocalypse did.Really those shots are very different to even compare them, one I assume is more practical with CGI used when he throws the copter. And the apocalypse one is just fassbender on a green screen while everyone is CGIed behind him.
Practical directing and directing a scene manipulated on a computer are very different.