Dark Phoenix X-Men: Dark Phoenix News and Speculation Thread - - - - - - Part 15

I think if the Skrulls were supposed to appear in this then its even more baffling that Kinberg decided to use the freaking Skrulls instead of the Shiar empire. Thank God, Disney stopped them if that was really the case!
 
Curious about the score, i like to listen before seeing the movies, but in this one theres not much about it yet..
The last thing i red it was:
"It's gonna be 2 CDs. First CD will be film score. Second will be more suites & ideas (as I told you Hans wrote a lot of music within the past 1.5 year). No release date yet, but you bet they are rushing to have it ready in 10 days..."
 
Any word on early screenings? I know some journalists have seen it, but not much beyond that

Grace Randolph mentioned in a Q&A that she's seeing it next week. Unsure if it just her or overall, since she hasn't seen/reviewed Godzilla while other seem to have.

It's seems the other journalists got to see the film because they interviewing the cast.
 
For those of you haven't bought Deadpool 2 and are interested in seeing Dark Phoenix, some copies have a sticker on the shrinkwrap that has a code for a $8 in movie money.

This was at Walmart in the USA (Florida) FYI.
 
People keep saying Kinberg is lying, but they're not thinking like writers, in terms of structure and story.

After the reception of APOCALYPSE, it's unlikely the movie would have been longer than say, 2:15-2:20. We started hearing that they intended to make a smaller, more intimate film almost immediately after the reception to the previous one.

There's clearly a focus on Phoenix herself this time around, and there are already a number of other storylines to develop and potentially wrap up, and there just likely wasn't ever going to be a sudden focus on Xavier's interstellar romantic life (Moira hardly counts) and a full introduction of the Shi'ar in the main narrative.

It's far more likely that any falsehoods being told are in regard to what was changed about the third act. Because I'm sure "wrapping up the franchise" had to be a major consideration of whatever reshoots occurred, and that they didn't just alter a space sequence for the heck of it, but more likely because that particular space sequence was designed and intended to send the franchise in a new direction, at least for one more film.

If there was a massive twist, it was likely something cosmic that would blow the franchise up again and make it more cosmic for a potential Part II scenario. Given all the rumors, it's quite possible there were some kind of Brood/Skrulls stand ins earlier in the film that were intended to lead into the Shi'ar's involvement in the universe along with the evolution/resolution of Phoenix.
 
People calling Kinberg a liar? Why hurt him? He has passion for these characters, love for these actors and he has shown nothing but love through his technical wizardry and mastery of film craft. His writing is sharp and laser focused with incredible story logic as seen from interviews and clips

Kinberg is here to share his love and make love. He isn’t here to lie! It’s just so perplexing to see such talent who has been an incredible bearer and faithful steward of this franchise to be unduly given such harsh words. He is a master portrayer of the arts and Dark Phoenix will help his singular crystal vision to emerge

I hope even opening songs are included similar to James Bond films. The passion of this song is on display and conveys the kind of masked heroism and love that the X-men have for each other and humanity under Kinberg’s crisp vision

 
Those suits were the best thing to come out of Apocalypse. They were well-designed and more in line with the comics than anything we've seen [reviously from this franchise. There really wasn't any need to change them.

SickScentedCopperhead-size_restricted.gif

Since this movie is taking place in the 90's that would've been a great opportunity to go all out with the Jim Lee designs and give us something we haven't seen in a live action X-Men movie before.

Instead they went with badly fitted suits from the 2000s comics that look dull.
 
I don’t mind the new suits, but they are a bit dull, especially after we were teased with those at the end of the last film.
And considering they don’t seem to be wearing the costumes besides for the first bit of the film, i definitely don’t see why they couldn’t have worn those or something similar
 


They talk about:
-how they believe the original story from a year ago that the reshoots WEREN'T 3 months was a PR spin;
-how just because the original third act might've had a similar scene with Captain Marvel is not a good enough excuse to reshoot your entire third act. They think the original third act STANK TO HIGH HEAVENS and production was just using the "we don't want to repeat from another movie" as an excuse to reshoot a horrible third act; and
-how there's no place for Kinberg under Feige in the MCU.
 
Last edited:
Pretty much the internet's beliefs/reaction as well. We'll see, but right now it just seems like it's going to sputter across the finish.
 
If Disney and Marvel Studios told them to reshoot the third act because of Captain Marvel, that's not out the realm of possibility.

Plus, it will explain why they also moved the film from February to June to move it away from Captain Marvel.
 
Plus, it will explain why they also moved the film from February to June to move it away from Captain Marvel.
Come on...do your research. The original release date was November 2018, not close to Captain Marvel's March 2019 date. The February 2019 (first delay) was announced as far back as March 2018 and reshoots were already brought up as the reason then.
If Disney and Marvel Studios told them to reshoot the third act because of Captain Marvel, that's not out the realm of possibility.
If you are Fox and supposedly getting your marching orders from Marvel (like you are alluding to), why would you anger "Lord Feige" and move your movie one month before their movie?
Pretty much the internet's beliefs/reaction as well. We'll see, but right now it just seems like it's going to sputter across the finish.
I really don't get how that "the reshoots only lasted for 2 1/2 weeks" narrative was widely believed (I blame Collider...). Especially when the same people spreading it also said the entire 3rd act was reshot.

You can't shoot 1/3 of your big budget movie in 3 weeks people...
 
Last edited:
Come on...do your research. The original release date was November 2018, not close to Captain Marvel's March 2019 date. The February 2019 (first delay) was announced as far back as March 2018.

If you are Fox and supposedly getting your marching orders from Marvel (like you are alluding to), why would you anger "Lord Feige" and move your movie one month before their movie?

I really don't get how that "the reshoots only lasted for 2 1/2 weeks" narrative was widely believed (I blame Collider...). Especially when the same people spreading it also said the entire 3rd act was reshot.

You can't shoot 1/3 of your big budget movie in 3 weeks people...

If Disney and Marvel Studios told them to reshoot the third act because of Captain Marvel, that's not out the realm of possibility.

Plus, it will explain why they also moved the film from February to June to move it away from Captain Marvel.

Playing the blame game about a production that most people were dubious about before principal photography is not doing Kinberg or the film any favors from A PR perspective. It looks like petty excuses and throwing in the towel a week before release.

Maybe the film turns out great, i dunno, this is not how you market a film.
 
that scene is about just ending which is in fact similar to CM. and now changed. it's just how she defeat ailens in very final. no longer CM style. even tho it wasn't really CM "style", the idea is pretty much similar.
and changing that wasn't difficult for fox as they were already on big 3month reshoot for train scenes and considering the merger talk has been on whole 2018 and they all know each other, talk each other. I believe james on that.
 
There kinda were constant parallels with the MCU throughout the x-men prequels. Quicksilver first appeared in X-Men after the MCU had announced their Quicksilver. Psylocke joined X-Men with Gamora's same hairstyle after Gamora had already been on the big screen. I think Apocalypse was their way to compete with Thanos as well.

The standout for me was really Fan Binbing's Blink. Believing in your own unique vision when you know you're good can really pay off sometimes.

Those could not be more wrong. Singer announced Quicksilver would appear in DoFP before MCU even casted him. Psylocke's outfit is adapted almost directly from comics so it's not about Gamora. Also the whole Apocalypse thing was Fox's response to making a more traditional CBM with destructions and destroying the world type of thing, so it was not about Thanos either.
 
Those could not be more wrong. Singer announced Quicksilver would appear in DoFP before MCU even casted him. Psylocke's outfit is adapted almost directly from comics so it's not about Gamora. Also the whole Apocalypse thing was Fox's response to making a more traditional CBM with destructions and destroying the world type of thing, so it was not about Thanos either.

Before MCU casted him? Pretty sure the timeline was Whedon announced Quicksilver (and again on Fallon's show) much earlier then Singers infamous "before he was an Avenger..." tweet.
 
Before MCU casted him? Pretty sure the timeline was Whedon announced Quicksilver (and again on Fallon's show) much earlier then Singers infamous "before he was an Avenger..." tweet.

Oh, my bad then. Must investigate further into it's details.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"