DamianWayne23
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2012
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Oh come on, really...?
umm yea really. Idk whats so baffling about my post, it seems like a reasonably valid point am I missing something here?
Oh come on, really...?
That this is a superhero movie perhaps? The main character is suposed to go through the impossible. After all that happened in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, THIS is the thing you dont believe.umm yea really. Idk whats so baffling about my post, it seems like a reasonably valid point am I missing something here?
That this is a superhero movie perhaps? The main character is suposed to go through the impossible. After all that happened in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, THIS is the thing you dont believe.
If I had to express it thematically, I think what we’re saying is that for Batman and Commissioner Gordon, there’s a big sacrifice, a big compromise, at the end of the ‘The Dark Knight’ and for that to mean something, that sacrifice has to work and Gotham has to get better in a sense. They have to achieve something for the ending of that film — and the feeling at the end of that film — to have validity. Their sacrifice has to have meaning and it takes time to establish that and to show that, and that’s the primary reason we did that.
The license plates on the cars in DKR all have 2013 on their registration stickers. The ones in TDK all said 2008. That's only 5 years.
The license plates on the cars in DKR all have 2013 on their registration stickers. The ones in TDK all said 2008. That's only 5 years.

I like the fact that Nolan had the guts to take his Batman to controversial places.
I always was an advocate of the eight years retired Batman in that regard.
Nolan's Batman always was different than your typical Batman portrayal (always looking for an opportunity to get rid of the cape and cowl for good). And I especially like that Bruce in Begins was portrayed as a young, naive idealist, like Rachel.
In TDK, Batman was shown to have grown up somewhat, and the movie showed that his batman persona was starting to take its toll physically and psychologically. Bruce matured and was seen longing for a settled life with rachel instead of just continuing the fight forever.
It's only natural that the blow dealt to him by her death would be enough for him to hang up the cape for good.
I don't go to the Batman movies to see the definitive Batman portrayal, which is a utopia I abandoned a long time ago. I just enjoy them for what they are : personal interpretations from an artist, in thsi case, Nolan.
Batman doesn't have to be respectful of his comic-book counterpart as long as they are made interesting. I actually even think that those very differences between the original character and the interpretations we see on the silver screen are what makes them interesting.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to see this batman's journey come to an end, and see how his eight year long retirement has affected him and his ability to be Batman. not physically : psychologically.
Is he secretly longing to don the cape again, and therefore will use Bane as an excuse to justify it? Or is he a tired man, freed from the delusions of his younger self, that will face becoming Batman as a necessary evil, without truthfully wanting to do it again?
I can't wait to see how this conflict is portrayed in the film.
The fact he's been inactive makes me wish it were more like 1 or 2 years. 8 is astonishing.Interesting observation...
Anway, 8 years is long, I don't mind it, but 5 years would've also been good.![]()
So.....how does everyone feel about the retirement before we see what it's like? I'm looking forward to the effects of being away.
I'm still wondering if Nolan is going to be able to sell it to the audience, with Batman being away for so long. But I'm not judging anything until I see it. In all honesty, it's kind of brilliant actually - Bruce was gone for I think 7 years during BB, now Batman will be gone for 8 this time around in TDKR. Nolan is slick.