• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

87th Annual Academy Awards (2015) - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Holy ****! That sounds awful...awfully amazing!:awesome:

I found that film offensively bad. It gets many things wrong about college professors and how class enrollment works.

And let's not forget the way how badly the film sees characters with secular or different beliefs.

Frankly, I'm surprised that film didn't sweep the Razzies. Maybe it's a good thing it didn't.
 
We have to go back all the way to 07 and find another white american director winning BD...which I'm kinda surprised myself. LAwd.


Kathryn Bigelow won in 2009. Though it's easy to forget Hurt Locker, as the entire movie seems to be just set-up scenes for every gay porno I've Sawyer's ever seen.
 
Kathryn Bigelow won in 2009. Though it's easy to forget Hurt Locker, as the entire movie seems to be just set-up scenes for every gay porno I've Sawyer's ever seen.

Oh, I didn't forget her. I was simply talking about ''men'' directors in general. Most of the right wing hate on twitter is about '' another mexican guy'' winning.
 
Oh, I didn't forget her. I was simply talking about ''men'' directors in general. Most of the right wing hate on twitter is about '' another mexican guy'' winning.


Fair enough, though I think Bigelow's two most famous movies should satisfy the need for some extreme conservatives to be able to go to the movies without a single belief of theirs challenged in any way. She's one of the "manliest" directors out there. :woot:
 

From James Gunn:

I didn't really find the Jack Black superhero jokes offensive, did you guys? It was, like, a joke. I'm not sure if you guys noticed, but the writing on the Oscars didn't seem to be all that well thought out.


As far as Dan Gilroy saying that attendees of the Independent Spirit Awards have survived against a "tsunami of superhero films" - well it seems a bit weird coming from a guy whose wife has acted in two Thor films - really, that seems like you've drowned horribly in that tsunami. But I know I just kind of make up stuff as I go along on these awards shows, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Whatever the case, the truth is, popular fare in any medium has always been snubbed by the self-appointed elite. I've already won more awards than I ever expected for Guardians. What bothers me slightly is that many people assume because you make big films that you put less love, care, and thought into them then people do who make independent films or who make what are considered more serious Hollywood films. I've made B-movies, independent films, children's movies, horror films, and gigantic spectacles. I find there are plenty of people everywhere making movies for a buck or to feed their own vanity. And then there are people who do what they do because they love story-telling, they love cinema, and they want to add back to the world some of the same magic they've taken from the works of others. In all honesty, I do no find a strikingly different percentage of those with integrity and those without working within any of these fields of film.

If you think people who make superhero movies are dumb, come out and say we're dumb. But if you, as an independent filmmaker or a "serious" filmmaker, think you put more love into your characters than the Russo Brothers do Captain America, or Joss Whedon does the Hulk, or I do a talking raccoon, you are simply mistaken.

Kane, that Chris Pine lone tear gif is needed here.

Fair enough, though I think Bigelow's two most famous movies should satisfy the need for some extreme conservatives to be able to go to the movies without a single belief of theirs challenged in any way. She's one of the "manliest" directors out there. :woot:

Bigelow's a great director, but damn, if she was ever gonna win, it should have been for Zero Dark Thirty. The difference between Zero Dark Thirty and The Hurt Locker is that people are still talking about one over the other.
 
So, wait wait wait.... the writer of The Imitation Game ISN'T gay?
 
Bigelow's a great director, but damn, if she was ever gonna win, it should have been for Zero Dark Thirty.
That sounds odd given it was her most recent movie. I mean, I get that you mean over The Hurt Locker, but she could just be getting better and deserve it more for her next one. Russell Crowe won for the "wrong" movie too. It happens.
 
Last edited:
Kathryn Bigelow might have made American Sniper a little less cringe-inducing.
 

From James Gunn:

I didn't really find the Jack Black superhero jokes offensive, did you guys? It was, like, a joke. I'm not sure if you guys noticed, but the writing on the Oscars didn't seem to be all that well thought out.


As far as Dan Gilroy saying that attendees of the Independent Spirit Awards have survived against a "tsunami of superhero films" - well it seems a bit weird coming from a guy whose wife has acted in two Thor films - really, that seems like you've drowned horribly in that tsunami. But I know I just kind of make up stuff as I go along on these awards shows, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Whatever the case, the truth is, popular fare in any medium has always been snubbed by the self-appointed elite. I've already won more awards than I ever expected for Guardians. What bothers me slightly is that many people assume because you make big films that you put less love, care, and thought into them then people do who make independent films or who make what are considered more serious Hollywood films. I've made B-movies, independent films, children's movies, horror films, and gigantic spectacles. I find there are plenty of people everywhere making movies for a buck or to feed their own vanity. And then there are people who do what they do because they love story-telling, they love cinema, and they want to add back to the world some of the same magic they've taken from the works of others. In all honesty, I do no find a strikingly different percentage of those with integrity and those without working within any of these fields of film.

If you think people who make superhero movies are dumb, come out and say we're dumb. But if you, as an independent filmmaker or a "serious" filmmaker, think you put more love into your characters than the Russo Brothers do Captain America, or Joss Whedon does the Hulk, or I do a talking raccoon, you are simply mistaken.

Jack Black was mocking superhero movies?
 
That sounds odd given it was her most recent movie. I mean, I get that you mean over The Hurt Locker, but she could just be getting better and deserve it more for her next one. Russell Crowe won for the "wrong" movie too. It happens.

You could have made that same argument with The Hurt Locker. But overall, Bigelow's past films were better than Hurt Locker and has always been relatively consistent.

Or am I misunderstanding this? I'll admit I'm a bit confused.
 

From James Gunn:

I didn't really find the Jack Black superhero jokes offensive, did you guys? It was, like, a joke. I'm not sure if you guys noticed, but the writing on the Oscars didn't seem to be all that well thought out.


As far as Dan Gilroy saying that attendees of the Independent Spirit Awards have survived against a "tsunami of superhero films" - well it seems a bit weird coming from a guy whose wife has acted in two Thor films - really, that seems like you've drowned horribly in that tsunami. But I know I just kind of make up stuff as I go along on these awards shows, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Whatever the case, the truth is, popular fare in any medium has always been snubbed by the self-appointed elite. I've already won more awards than I ever expected for Guardians. What bothers me slightly is that many people assume because you make big films that you put less love, care, and thought into them then people do who make independent films or who make what are considered more serious Hollywood films. I've made B-movies, independent films, children's movies, horror films, and gigantic spectacles. I find there are plenty of people everywhere making movies for a buck or to feed their own vanity. And then there are people who do what they do because they love story-telling, they love cinema, and they want to add back to the world some of the same magic they've taken from the works of others. In all honesty, I do no find a strikingly different percentage of those with integrity and those without working within any of these fields of film.

If you think people who make superhero movies are dumb, come out and say we're dumb. But if you, as an independent filmmaker or a "serious" filmmaker, think you put more love into your characters than the Russo Brothers do Captain America, or Joss Whedon does the Hulk, or I do a talking raccoon, you are simply mistaken.

This is the perfect response, calm, well worded and genuine. :up:
 
You could have made that same argument with The Hurt Locker. But overall, Bigelow's past films were better than Hurt Locker and has always been relatively consistent.

Or am I misunderstanding this? I'll admit I'm a bit confused.
Sorry, my point was just that they can only decide based on that year who they think deserves it, because obviously they can never know what these winners will be doing next. You could look at it this way - if their next movie is even better than the one they won for, like with Bigelow, then they chose pretty well, lol.
 
Sorry, my point was just that they can only decide based on that year who they think deserves it, because obviously they can never know what these winners will be doing next. You could look at it this way - if their next movie is even better than the one they won for, like with Bigelow, then they chose pretty well, lol.

Ah, I see. You're right it is all within hindsight. But I just didn't think The Hurt Locker was even that great of a movie. It's just not very memorable. It's just too bad she wasn't nominated for Zero Dark Thirty. That would have been a worthy nomination.
 
I agree she should've at least been nominated for ZDT, as it was totally better than The Hurt Locker. That said, I really did like Hurt Locker quite a bit, and while it wasn't my favorite of the year or anything, I was happy when she won.
 
Better than Avatar at least.
 
That sounds odd given it was her most recent movie. I mean, I get that you mean over The Hurt Locker, but she could just be getting better and deserve it more for her next one. Russell Crowe won for the "wrong" movie too. It happens.

1000000% disagree. Gladiator is easily Crowe's best performance.
 
I prefer his performance as Jeffery Waigand in The Insider. Amazing performance.
 
I prefer his performance as Jeffery Waigand in The Insider. Amazing performance.
Yeah, I preferred that one, too. I loved him in Gladiator, but of the 3 in a row he was nominated for, I found it to be the least impressive. Hell, he wasn't even nominated for Cinderella Man, and I thought that was his best.
 
Cinderella Man is an underrated classic.
 
Does the Academy just not like Christopher Nolans movies? He never wins anything despite his ongoing success.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"