The Dark Knight Rises Adapting Robin

That's the thing, Nolan isn't setting up Baleman to be inhuman, he's still fawning over his childhood sweetheart, for crying out loud. Grayson shoud, in my mind, provide motivation for Batman to stay SANE... just long enough to train the next Batman before going into full on I AM BATMAN lunacy that makes the character truly awesome.
 
1) Grayson is the one whom best carries the kind of sarcastic banter that they put in Lucious, Alfred and even Bruce's mouth.

but the risk is casting him soley as comic relief (or this is how the audience might see the character if he's wise-cracking all the time). not necessarily a good thing.
 
I don't know many people who lose both parents and then engage in witty banter afterwards. Robin isn't comic relief, he's just a kid who's only slightly more lighthearted than Batman. I don't think Robin is a character that should be done, he's a character that needs to be done. We have yet to see a faithful adaption of him on the big screen, and he is a integral part of the Batman and DCU mythos. It doesn't have to be Nolan who does it, but some one should after him.
 
I don't know many people who lose both parents and then engage in witty banter afterwards.

then you don't know any people who've lost both parents.
honestly, yes, its something that is upsetting and emotionally scarring, but most normal people learn to deal with it, and they're not above having fun either.
 
I just thought that line made me see why he might be willing to leave and join or start the JLA (and then that made me think what it would take for him to leave Gothem at all).
 
I don't know if any of these ideas have been mentioned but here is how they could do a reasonable Robin/Nightwing, at least to me.
In the first film Bruce mentioned that as Bruce Wayne he is just a man, he could be killed or ignored, but as a symbol (as Batman), he couldn't.
Maybe along these lines Bruce also knows that the man behind the idea of Batman can be killed, so to make sure Batman is more than just one man (to make sure Batman is immortal) Bruce starts training some young people.
Sort of apprentises.

(as we get into the details the idea gets a little mirky)
The meeting of Batman and Robin:
Maybe he teaches a self defense class to several students or maybe he just found the one child with a background and aptitude like his own.
I do like the idea that Bruce saves a kid much like himself from the League because it would make sence that they took in another child with the background and aptitude like Bruce. And it gives Bruce a plausible reason for bringing Dick Grayson in.
In fact, I think this is how it should go. Maybe Bruce was already thinking of training a replacement or several. Then he saves Dick Grayson from the League. Bruce knows how dangerous the League is so he takes Dick Grayson in as protection.
(This could be the film that introduces Talia, since we are bringing in the League, or maybe not.)
The only problem with this idea is that it sort of takes away from Bruce wanting to train a replacement.

Robin:
Dick Grayson should be around a teenager, around the age Bruce was when he left Gothem.
While Bruce goes on missions as Batman, Dick acts as his technical support (because I can't justify why Bruce would put another person at risk like tthis until they have been through years of training), and then he trains when Bruce is off duty.

This could also create some tension sometime down the line because sooner or later, sometime in their relationship, Grayson would feel like just a replacement. And maybe even decide he doesn't know if he wants that. Just like in the comics Dick could feel like he is trapped in Bruce's shadow, and feel like Bruce is over controlling and over protective.
Some tension might also rise from Dick Grayson not being as sad and angry over his parents death as Bruce. While Bruce wont let his parent's death go, and holds on to all the hurt and sadness, Dick Grayson is more normal about it and eventually begins to move on. (not that he just suddenly doesn't care that his parents are dead, I hope I am making myself clear.)

I don't know what the plot of that particular movie would be though. Maybe it would have something to do with the League, or maybe it would have something to do with whatever villian is used in that movie. Or maybe the plot would be Batman moving on from Gothem.
But the only real way I see Robin working as a character is to have Bruce to create Robin as his replacement, because Bruce isn't immortal and eventually he will die. Gothem might get better, but it will always need a Batman.
And Bruce might see that the world is in need of Batman and a League of its own.

So to summerize, Robin would be Batman's replacement in training (who only acts as ech support from the Batcave while training) and maybe have some connection to the same league that trained Bruce.

Another plus for this idea is that when the Teen Titans start Nightwing could still have a connection to Batman, and maybe even mention it.






I also had an idea where Aflred signs Bruce up as a big brother, to get him out of the Batcave and maybve to help him not be so grim all the time. And maybe that one kid could be Jason Todd.
 
That would be "Gotham" with an "a". I was sad to hear that the "World's Finest" film has been shelved for the foreseable future. I'm still wanting to see Batman and Supes team-up on the Silver Screen. That has always been one of my favorite team-ups from the DCU.
 
I AM SO SICK OF THESE ******ED BAT-FANS BEING ANTI-ROBIN.... so one lame director screwed up Robin by getting a mediocre @ best actor to play him in 1995in a movie that was too cheezy for its own good...

& BURTON (KING OF BATMOVIES) screwed up even more by giving michael keaton a horrible comedic actor
GIVE the boy wonder a chance... if in the hands of the right director, he could be just as dark, serious & FUN AS Batman....

how does one never understand the appeal of Robin... HE EXISTS get over it!

BATMAN WAS ONLY ALONE FOR the 1st year of his career... Robin came in and was just as tough, just as driven & just as serious as The Dark Knight...

I'm telling you. GIVE ROBIN THE RIGHT SUIT/COSTUME & he could really be effective!
 
i will add by saying.... ANYONE WHO DOESN'T THINK ROBIN CAN WORK/be effective/ be serious...

go watch an episode of BATMAN THE ANIMATED SERIES: Robin's Reckoning
 
but I didn't like it, and I still don't want Robin in the movies... Maybe I am sick in the head... =(
 
I wouldn't want him right now, but definitely would want him in the next iteration of the Batman series. He's an important figure in the mythos, and he has a very rich history with tremendous potential that has yet to be tapped.

I'm for it in the future. :up:
 
i will add by saying.... ANYONE WHO DOESN'T THINK ROBIN CAN WORK/be effective/ be serious...

go watch an episode of BATMAN THE ANIMATED SERIES: Robin's Reckoning

that episode (two parter?) wasn't all that good. pretty poor example.
 
I do not want Robin in the new series, because the only reason he exists is to make Batman more accessible to kids. I do not want Nolan's Batman to be "family oriented." I like it good and dark, and Batman is always at his best when he has no side kicks.

As Catwoman said in Hush, "For a man who's supposedly a loner, you have a lot of strings." And that's exactly why the movies do not need and should not have Robin. I do not want the movie Batman to be a supposed loner, I just want him to be a loner.
 
well this thread's turned out alright after all, there are some quality ideas in here.

That said, 20 pages in perhaps a gentle reminder might not be out of place :cwink:
robin.gif
........

this topic is NOT about whether Robin SHOULD be introduced. We've gone over that many times and I've made a new thread to keep that stuff out of here.

if you really are against including Robin then please use this thread to explain how you'd make the best of the decision rather than just opposing it













So, the inclusion of The Vigilantes in TDK is a natural first step/exploration of the themes tied to Robin or any junior sidekick in general. The film is already confronting the issues head on. so after TDK I don't think the plausibility or the potential merit of involving Robin will be so laughable as it appears now.

Here's an outline of the basic elements I would include in a modern Robin, appearing in a new trilogy. A WIP checklist of fundamentals.

- Tones of Jason Todd: arrogant, reckless, 'a danger if not harnessed for good'
- A multidisciplinary circus background; acrobatics, exhibition/tournament combat, knife throwing, stunt riding. He's had a headstart on Bruce because he was raised as a circus all-rounder since birth. Physically gifted in the extreme and a fast learner of new physical skills.
- Bruce is actively scouting for an understudy; through a Wayne Corp scholarship he discreetly manages several initiviatives to locate and train new talent, the Grayson Circus being but one of many. ASBR has this much correct; Bruce is nothing if not obssesivvly prepared, and this "I work alone" nonsense is outdated and inconsistent and eventually it just gets stale.
-When Dick's parents are killed, Bruce KNOWS that from a shortlist of star candidates only Dick has the final and most crucial qualification for the job. Problem is he's young, ready before schedule so he'll need a to be taken in early and trained in secret preparation for a few years before making his debut. Too bad he's 17, stupid, vengeful and insubordinate.
-Dick is NOT 'adopted'. He does not become a 'ward' to a vapid, selfish hedonistic 30yr old playboy, this is not 1939 and it does not make any sensel. Instead, Dick is put up in a Wayne-funded boarding school/sports training acedemy and Bruce pays him begrudging visits as conditions of the scholarship as well as Bruces new role as 'juvenile mentor', which incidentlly is earning him a nice boost in the media slash public opinion. Eventually Bruce and Dick form a genuine bond, partly because of shared history and circumstance, but mainly because Bruce knows exactly what he's doing with this child. Bruce uses his boys toys for an initial advantage; cars, bikes, exotic weapons etc, and when Dick is oddly unimpressed by Bruce's disposable women and shallow lifestyle, they confirm to each other that there is a connection somewhere deeper and now it's time for the fake walls to come down. Eventually it's not so much father-son thing as it is a brother-to-brother, older role model or mentor type thing which eventually becomes master-to-student, captain-to-soldier, knight-to-squire. If you seriously think a confused 17yr old orphan cannot look up to a 30yr old veteran with genuine admiration, respect and obediance, then you've never worked in a proffesional environment or SEEN A SINGLE MILITARY MOVIE. The old father-son dynamic is restrictive, naivly simplistic and so overdone it's become cheesy.

Combine the elements above with the themes and questions raised by the vigilantes in TDK...and you can see how the proccess behind 'Robin' actually begins to make alot of perfect sense. Moving on..

-The costume should be fundamentally identical to Tim Drake's, just make it real, practical, flesh it out and add details and flourishes and it will look great in execution. The domino mask, flowing hair and bright colours are absolutely critical to the visual translation of what the Robin represents. Fortunately when you're playing with Robin you're also playing with a considerably higher suspension of belief, particularily in regards to Batman Begins for example. It's supposed be fun, it's a classic look and it deserves to be permitted and updated with respect.
- Batman glides; Robin uses free frunning and an 'aerial motorbike'. this differentiates Robin from Batman, builds on his circus background and urban environments and looks cool in action sequences.
-Robin carries a quarterstaff, nunchuks, throwing knives and a non-lethal rifle which makes him look a boy scout or a young Daniel Boone when he's aiming it at buildings. Robin's main strengths are his balls, his emotional maturity and his acrobatics; he hasn't had the extensive combat training Batman has so the weapons help substitute. He has a parachute in his back and a flare device in his cape used for blinding & confusing or creating a diversion that allows Batman to do his thing. Robin's main weaknesses are in logic and investigation. This is what Batman must concentrate his teaching on, it is the hardest to learn. Patience, theory, mental rigour and acuity.
To the public eye, Robin dazzles; he needs to look emboldening, chivalrous, exotic and commanding. The embroidered costume, the colours, the faint shimmerring light coming off him (from the flare cape) are all a part of that. He's a herald to the bogeyman and the public face of the dynamic duo; you always know that The Bat is lurking somewhere close behind him, that's why crooks fear and respect him and why citizens LOVE him.
 
As Catwoman said in Hush, "For a man who's supposedly a loner, you have a lot of strings." And that's exactly why the movies do not need and should not have Robin. I do not want the movie Batman to be a supposed loner, I just want him to be a loner.
You can still have connections and still be a loner. By that accord, Batman was NEVER a loner, since he's always had someone at his side since his conception. Whether that be Leslie Thompkins, Alfred, Gordon, or even Selina...

That's what makes Selina's quote so interesting. It's pokes fun at the truth, but at the same time her statement is false. Cause we all know that Batman at his core IS a loner. Doesn't make a difference how many people are around him.
 
Forget the yellow inside the cape. Make it green or red or black, but yellow messes with the stealth aspect way too much.
 
green and red stand out a lot as well... oh well.. CC says no to robin
 
Here's an outline of the basic elements I would include in a modern Robin, appearing in a new trilogy. A WIP checklist of fundamentals.

- Tones of Jason Todd: arrogant, reckless, 'a danger if not harnessed for good'
- A multidisciplinary circus background; acrobatics, exhibition/tournament combat, knife throwing, stunt riding. He's had a headstart on Bruce because he was raised as a circus all-rounder since birth. Physically gifted in the extreme and a fast learner of new physical skills.
- Bruce is actively scouting for an understudy; through a Wayne Corp scholarship he discreetly manages several initiviatives to locate and train new talent, the Grayson Circus being but one of many. ASBR has this much correct; Bruce is nothing if not obssesivvly prepared, and this "I work alone" nonsense is outdated and inconsistent and eventually it just gets stale.
-When Dick's parents are killed, Bruce KNOWS that from a shortlist of star candidates only Dick has the final and most crucial qualification for the job. Problem is he's young, ready before schedule so he'll need a to be taken in early and trained in secret preparation for a few years before making his debut. Too bad he's 17, stupid, vengeful and insubordinate.
-Dick is NOT 'adopted'. He does not become a 'ward' to a vapid, selfish hedonistic 30yr old playboy, this is not 1939 and it does not make any sensel. Instead, Dick is put up in a Wayne-funded boarding school/sports training acedemy and Bruce pays him begrudging visits as conditions of the scholarship as well as Bruces new role as 'juvenile mentor', which incidentlly is earning him a nice boost in the media slash public opinion. Eventually Bruce and Dick form a genuine bond, partly because of shared history and circumstance, but mainly because Bruce knows exactly what he's doing with this child. Bruce uses his boys toys for an initial advantage; cars, bikes, exotic weapons etc, and when Dick is oddly unimpressed by Bruce's disposable women and shallow lifestyle, they confirm to each other that there is a connection somewhere deeper and now it's time for the fake walls to come down. Eventually it's not so much father-son thing as it is a brother-to-brother, older role model or mentor type thing which eventually becomes master-to-student, captain-to-soldier, knight-to-squire. If you seriously think a confused 17yr old orphan cannot look up to a 30yr old veteran with genuine admiration, respect and obediance, then you've never worked in a proffesional environment or SEEN A SINGLE MILITARY MOVIE. The old father-son dynamic is restrictive, naivly simplistic and so overdone it's become cheesy.

Combine the elements above with the themes and questions raised by the vigilantes in TDK...and you can see how the proccess behind 'Robin' actually begins to make alot of perfect sense. Moving on..

-The costume should be fundamentally identical to Tim Drake's, just make it real, practical, flesh it out and add details and flourishes and it will look great in execution. The domino mask, flowing hair and bright colours are absolutely critical to the visual translation of what the Robin represents. Fortunately when you're playing with Robin you're also playing with a considerably higher suspension of belief, particularily in regards to Batman Begins for example. It's supposed be fun, it's a classic look and it deserves to be permitted and updated with respect.
- Batman glides; Robin uses free frunning and an 'aerial motorbike'. this differentiates Robin from Batman, builds on his circus background and urban environments and looks cool in action sequences.
-Robin carries a quarterstaff, nunchuks, throwing knives and a non-lethal rifle which makes him look a boy scout or a young Daniel Boone when he's aiming it at buildings. Robin's main strengths are his balls, his emotional maturity and his acrobatics; he hasn't had the extensive combat training Batman has so the weapons help substitute. He has a parachute in his back and a flare device in his cape used for blinding & confusing or creating a diversion that allows Batman to do his thing. Robin's main weaknesses are in logic and investigation. This is what Batman must concentrate his teaching on, it is the hardest to learn. Patience, theory, mental rigour and acuity.
To the public eye, Robin dazzles; he needs to look emboldening, chivalrous, exotic and commanding. The embroidered costume, the colours, the faint shimmerring light coming off him (from the flare cape) are all a part of that. He's a herald to the bogeyman and the public face of the dynamic duo; you always know that The Bat is lurking somewhere close behind him, that's why crooks fear and respect him and why citizens LOVE him.

I'm not crazy about the 'scouting for an understudy' thing, or the 'star candidates.' But most of what you've got here would be awesome and I think would work on screen.

I think for the character to work, they may have to truly redefine what Robin means to Batman, and the concept of superhero sidekicks in general. And I'm completely welcome to that.
 
I do not want Robin in the new series, because the only reason he exists is to make Batman more accessible to kids. I do not want Nolan's Batman to be "family oriented." I like it good and dark, and Batman is always at his best when he has no side kicks.

As Catwoman said in Hush, "For a man who's supposedly a loner, you have a lot of strings." And that's exactly why the movies do not need and should not have Robin. I do not want the movie Batman to be a supposed loner, I just want him to be a loner.

A) The bold statement is false.
B) Baleman is NOT a loner and would be completely impotent without Lucious Fox, Alfred Pennyworth and Jim Gordon. They were Nolan's version of the Bat-Family.

On Nepenthes' notes:
- Tones of Jason Todd: Yes, some indeed, adds to the character. Yes.
- A multidisciplinary circus background; Yes, a prerequisite for making a vigilante career even remotely believable
- Bruce is actively scouting for an understudy; No, thank you. It breaks too far away from the comics and introduces too many complications... now there's a paper trail, for instance. Also you're talking about finding and cataloguing a home-schooled travelling circus performer. Also, it's silly to think that Batman can just be reproduced at will, Bruce should be smart enough to know that what he has inside him can't just be made or found, it has to be created through a unique and unpredictable experience.
-When Dick's parents are killed, Bruce KNOWS that from a shortlist of star candidates only Dick has the final and most crucial qualification for the job. Um, now we're REALLY pushing the coincidence meter. And unnecessarily so. No thanks.
- Dick is NOT 'adopted'. There is power in making Bruce a mentor rather than a father, I can agree with that, accentuating Grayson's emotional maturity and making something... "different" from all the (nonexistent) plethora of Father-son movies out there that are gluting the market. As opposed to the oh-so-rare mentor-mentee movies. There is also a level of believability and convenience in Grayson being housed elsewhere. A great deal. This idea could be modified to be more consistent with the comics and more emotionally resonant, whether or not Grayson is actually adopted is actually somewhat arbitrary, but moving away from the Bruce-and-Dick forever is a good idea.

Combine the elements above with the themes and questions raised by the vigilantes in TDK...and you can see how the proccess behind 'Robin' actually begins to make alot of perfect sense. Moving on..
It would, save for a few small, but amazingly important, omissions in logic.

-The costume should be fundamentally identical to Tim Drake's Not necessarily, the only thing necessary, designwise should be a red breast, an R symbol and headgear reminicent of a domino mask. How sleeves and briefs are indespensable is beyond me.
- Batman glides; Robin uses free frunning and an 'aerial motorbike'. Agreed... though the Aerial motorbike is pushing it a bit... Free running is plenty.
-Robin carries a quarterstaff, nunchuks, throwing knives and a non-lethal rifle Um... a rifle? Why? Is Daniel Boone so very cool he has to worm his way into the public? The Quarterstaff and some throwing weapons are fine for the type of things that a newbie Vigilante will likely end up doing.
To the public eye, Robin dazzles; Completely contrary to what a vigiliante needs to be... have we forgotten that Batman is a wanted man? Leave all that trapping and showiness for the cartoons.
 
Robin is an important part of Batman mythos, however... He makes no sense at all. Why would someone put a child in that kind of danger, no matter how trained he is? The only explanation is that Batman is a total nutjob, and thats not really how people want this trilogy to be. Robin is part of Batman, but maybe not this Batman.
 
1. He must be slightly older than the typical comic Robin. Make him 16 or 17, but mature for his age.
2. Bruce and Dick don't live together. It's too ridiculous for anyone to allow an orphan to move in with selfish, irresponsible, playboy Bruce Wayne. Instead, have Bruce take an interest in him and give him a scholarship through his foundation. The "mentor" idea is a good one.
3. Bruce allows him to be his partner to "save" him. Dick goes hunting for the person who killed his parents. Bruce sees himself in him, and tells him that he will help him bring down his parent's killer the right way.
4. Make reference to training he's had in the circus. This explains how he can pick up on the vigilante thing so quickly. He should not be anywhere near the fighter Bruce is. Have him win fights with agility, brains, and technology.
5. His costume: dark shades of red and green with black mixed in. Full pants and sleeves, with black gloves and black boots. Have him ride a motorcycle, but show him spending most of his time on foot. The free-running is a great idea.
6. Don't make him kiddie. Yes, he can be sarcastic. All kids his age are. But he needs to act like a kid who's lived through a terrible tragedy. He should be angry, and take stupid risks because of his anger. But Bruce teaches him to channel his anger into something positive.

I would not have him involved in the third movie. It's too soon, and the focus still needs to be on Bruce's journey. After Bruce has established himself, we can bring in a partner. However, the focus needs to stay on Bruce. Show him trying to help the boy, show his empathy for his situation, and show him trying to stop him from becoming like him until he realizes there's no choice.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"