Marvin
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,564
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
I suppose people just don't think that sort of scale of damage doesn't belong in a superman film(though it was in the Originals too, only superman could reverse time). What ended up bothering me with the complaints were that some people wanted to act offended at the lives lost as if Snyder was some sort of careless sadist or something. I mean that Red Letter Media one for example...Even worse, I've read several reviews that said Superman caused all the carnage. A few blocks gets leveled in Man of Steel and we're suppose to be horrified, but when entire continents and cities slide into the sea in 2012 we're suppose to chew popcorn with a smile on our face.
Yes the effort in that one sequence by that one character in avengers really did seem to offset some outrage, though considering the lack of preconceptions about those characters I doubt they even needed that scene and would have still avoided the backlash.Whats worse is the damage in the Avengers gets overlooked because theres a few scenes showing the heroes helping a couple dozen civilians. Considering the Damage in the Avengers was much worse then the Japanese Tsunami which claimed the lives of tens of thousands, helping a couple dozen people doesnt give you an excuse to celebrate right after the fact.
I am curious how many people ended up dying in that film(not including the invasion fleet), as many have pointed out, there is a 911 like memorial on the news reel at the end there. Not sure what the heroes think about it all but I know the producers cared enough.
That's neither here nor there, I just wanted to make note of the fact that Metropolis seems to be a pretty huge city and a block of buildings isn't as bad as some people are making it out to be. I mean has anyone seen the ending to "Knowing"? yikes.
Then again, Krypton did get wiped out, well so did Vulcan...