*Having John Romita Jr. doing the artwork on Spider-Man always feels like coming home. And in this case, this is some of his best work. Granted, it still has that blocky look, but hes one of the best comic book artist out there that instills a sense of movement to his panels, especially scenes of Spidey in action. Solid A in my book.
*As for Dan Slotts story, its playful, amusing romp which evokes classic elements of Spider-Man with modern sensibilities. However, thats also its greatest weakness and well as its best advantage. I believe the IGN review for this issue said it best when the reviewer described his style on Amazing as a gimmicky, overly self-aware cover of Stan Lee's soap operatics There may be some decent scenes and dialogue here, but it still feels as though Slott is trying way too hard to wax nostalgic.
*That said, if he wanted to capture the Stan Lee and John Romita Sr. version of Peter Parker and Spider-Man, he did an excellent job. This certainly felt like the Spider-Man readers have come to love over the decades and there was some half-way decent quips here.
*You also have to give him credit for his utilization of almost all the current supporting cast. Some work better than others, but the best were Aunt May, Mayor J. Jonah Jameson, and newcomer Norah Winters.
*Of course, having Doc Ock return after so long is great, as I consider him Spideys number one arch villain (sorry Green Goblin lovers). Granted, his plan for controlling every device in New York with his brainwaves was practically the same as what Greg Weisman did for Doc Ock in the Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon, but its definitely worthy--and characteristically arrogant--of such a egomaniacal genius, and I especially liked the angle that he genuinely thought he was doing this for the benefit of the human race. And while it is a clichéd trope, the angle of Doc Ock dying from sustained injuries and radiation poisoning he sustained over the years was rooted in logic. And after all, since Doc Ock uses his mechanical arms anyway, why not go to the extreme and have him completely dependent on them? Sort of like what would happen if Stephen Hawking went completely insane.
*However, with regard to Doc Ocks new look and design, Ill paraphrase a famous quote by film critic Roger Ebert and say I hated this new look. Hated hated hated hated hated this new look. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it. Whats more, I think even John Romita Jr. hated this look, or he wouldnt have been so quick to reassure readers that it wasnt permanent. Give me John Byrnes bionic legged, no pants Doc Ock any day over this mummified crap on a stick.
*Another problem was the overabundance of guest appearance in what should be a Spider-Man solo outing, since we not only get Daredevil, but also the New Avengers and the Fantastic Four involved. Even so, at least they served a purpose in the overall story, and it was nice to have Spidey and the Human Torch team-up once again. Not to mention Johnny trying to hit on both Carlie and Norah just seemed so him.
*And speaking of the ladies, one of the weakest elements of the story actually was Peters attempt to get a plus one for the wedding. Its obvious that Slott has a soft spot for Carlie, but it wouldnt feel so forced if she wasnt such a cipher for Gwen Stacy and had she been adequately developed as a character like she was supposed to have been since Brand New Day began. Even more contrived was Peters eventual date to the wedding--Michelle Gonzales, a.k.a. Vin Gonzales with boobs. These two characters have only interacted ONCE, and she regarded him a total flake. And yet, here she is all chummy with Peter and playfully teasing him like she wants to be his girlfriend. Its painfully obvious Slott only did this to evoke the moment when the gang saw Peter with Mary Jane for the first time.
*Oh, yeah
Mary Jane is back! And its about friggin time! Anytime Marvel attempts to write off this character, the book is poorer because of it, and now that shes going to be a regular cast member again, theres definitely going to be some much needed sparks. Although, as I hinted before when I had spoilers of this issue, her catching the bouquet could be seen as a slap in the face for some considering how, technically, shes supposed to be married to Peter already, but also a sign of hope because it hints that Peter and her heading down the tunnel of love once again. And really, shes been gone for how many months, just shows up out of the blue, literally puts everything to a standstill, and yet acts like its no big deal--classic MJ if you ask me.
*But now we come to milestone moment of this issue--the wedding of Aunt May and J. Jonah Jamesons father. I didnt expect Marvel to actually go ahead and have them get married, so on that score, Im appreciate being wrong and surprised. It also provided some touching moments with May visiting Uncle Bens grave and praying for his help, and the moment where Peter and May relate to each other as if they were mother and son instead of aunt and nephew. Unfortunately, for a milestone, Aunt May getting remarried just fell flat. Thats because it is guilty of doing the very thing Joe Quesada et al accused Peter and MJs wedding of being--a manufactured, rushed, editorially-driven gimmick that threatens to undermine key aspects of Spider-Man, especially when you consider the fact that Aunt May met, dated, fell in love, had sex, became in engaged, and married within a mere four month period to a character who first debuted last November. It would be tolerable if Jay Jameson, a character who seemed to have so much promise, wasnt proved to be to Spider-Man what Terry Long was to the Teen Titans: a character who was so good to be true and who had virtually no flaws that he became an absolute bore to read about. Not to mention you know the other shoe is going to drop on some point with him and thus end Aunt Mays newfound marital status in the foreseeable future.
*As for the back-up features, I actually enjoyed them--yes, even Bob Gales story (I tell you, I almost fainted from shock). My favorites certainly have to be the first two. How fitting is it that Stan The Man Lee himself return to write a story for Amazing Spider-Man. Here, he takes his old concept of Spidey seeing a psychiatrist and turns into a met fictional critique on how Spidey has changed and regressed over his almost fifty year history; heck, given the amount of continuity readers and creators have tried to keep track of over the years, its no wonder were not all insane by now. And Mark Waids examination of Peter and Uncle Bens relationship from Bens point of view is such a refreshing perspective, considering how much importance hes played in Spideys development. I also thought Wellss story was amusing; after all, how could ridiculing the Spider-Mobile NOT be. Finally, Kellys Madame Web story definitely worked for what it was designed to do--to make you guess and speculate just what was in store for our favorite wall-crawler.
*Oh, and those tongue-in-cheek phony covers? Funny stuff.