Batty for Bats!
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2005
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
No worries Drak, I fully comprehend it now.
E-Mack said:These changes are pretty acceptable.
What about changes in regards to the forum's appearance, though? Wasn't there talk about someone here working on it while the site was down?
Michael Corleone said:I think both ideas are decent. I think #1 will do a good job at slowing down spam and just overall pointless stuff. #2 will be nice because I think it rewards folks that are veteran members yet don't post constantly.
So i didn`t imagine the spiderman one then?Drakon said:I'm the one doing that. We're still testing the skins and such, Making sure I didn't miss anything and that everythings readable and such.
black_dust said:So i didn`t imagine the spiderman one then?
snipe said:Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.
snipe said:Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.
snipe said:Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.
X-Ray said:Would birthday threads fall under the 1st option? Because it is kind of spamming since I, along with others, just post 3 word posts.![]()
twylight said:How exactly will option 2 effect the active community posters now?
What sorts of threads would fall under the game/trivia forum, and what would be the standard for which to judge them by?
Only time will telltwylight said:No..you did..sorry.![]()
![]()
black_dust said:So i didn`t imagine the spiderman one then?
hunter rider said:Maybe if the 50x50 avvy was allowed from the start it would stem some of the ppl that spam from the get go,im not sure,
idea 2 sounds good i guess ,im not sure any of this effects me at this point but the cutting down on the amount of posters whose majority of posts are one word is a good idea
Drakon said:I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by the first half.
The standard would pretty much be common sense. It'd be up to the staff to decide what exactly would classify, but most of these would be obvious, such as "Word Association" or "Last thing you.." would be marked as such. Generally, if it's not condusive [sp?] to holding a conversation, then it's probably spam.
twylight said:Give 'em an inch they'll take it a mile.
When I started here you were allowed an avatar right off the bat. I don't see how it added to spam in any particular way, I was told it was because people created many multiple accounts. However I still see that.
This thread isn't for suggestions, It's for voting.The Admin's have made up their minds to allow even this so don't look a gifted horse to closesly in the mouth.
![]()
vindrow said:To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.
These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect![]()
It's a multi-vote poll.vindrow said:To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.
These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect![]()
vindrow said:To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.
These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect![]()
Not anymore.Superman4ever said:You can vote for both!