ATTN! Potential Site Changes-PLEASE READ!

What do you choose? [Mulitple Choice Vote]

  • I like Option 1

  • I don't like Option 1

  • I like Option 2

  • I don't like Option 2


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
E-Mack said:
These changes are pretty acceptable.

What about changes in regards to the forum's appearance, though? Wasn't there talk about someone here working on it while the site was down?

I'm the one doing that. We're still testing the skins and such, Making sure I didn't miss anything and that everythings readable and such.
 
Michael Corleone said:
I think both ideas are decent. I think #1 will do a good job at slowing down spam and just overall pointless stuff. #2 will be nice because I think it rewards folks that are veteran members yet don't post constantly.

That's why you are the godfather. :up::up:

However, I'd make the large avi avalible to veteran users after their first year. Six months is no wait...
 
Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.
 
Drakon said:
I'm the one doing that. We're still testing the skins and such, Making sure I didn't miss anything and that everythings readable and such.
So i didn`t imagine the spiderman one then?
 
I think both are good ideas Drak. I agree with both of them.
 
black_dust said:
So i didn`t imagine the spiderman one then?

No..you did..sorry. :o ;)

snipe said:
Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.

We want a revolution, not a civil war. ;)
 
snipe said:
Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.

Y'know, while this place was on hiatus, I've been on Newsarama a lot and I thought that SHH should do the same thing. But since we do have a post count, this option by Drak is GREAT.
 
snipe said:
Why not kill off post counts and let everyone have a sig and avatar of choice (a la Newsarama)? That would deter a lot of spam.


Get back into yer cage. :mad:

But really, I think having the "Spam" forum will really be hard for people like me to try humorous threads. Are they community or are they spammish? It would probably piss me off and lead me to hibernate at Squad some more.
 
X-Ray said:
Would birthday threads fall under the 1st option? Because it is kind of spamming since I, along with others, just post 3 word posts. :confused:

No, they'd fall under Community, not the "Dumpster" or whatever we'd end up calling it.

twylight said:
How exactly will option 2 effect the active community posters now?

What sorts of threads would fall under the game/trivia forum, and what would be the standard for which to judge them by?

I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by the first half. :huh:

The standard would pretty much be common sense. It'd be up to the staff to decide what exactly would classify, but most of these would be obvious, such as "Word Association" or "Last thing you.." would be marked as such. Generally, if it's not condusive [sp?] to holding a conversation, then it's probably spam.
 
Maybe if the 50x50 avvy was allowed from the start it would stem some of the ppl that spam from the get go,im not sure,
idea 2 sounds good i guess ,im not sure any of this effects me at this point but the cutting down on the amount of posters whose majority of posts are one word is a good idea
 
black_dust said:
So i didn`t imagine the spiderman one then?

Yes and no. I was testing the Spider-Man pattern to see how it tiled, was all. There's no offical Spider-Man theme in the works yet.
 
hunter rider said:
Maybe if the 50x50 avvy was allowed from the start it would stem some of the ppl that spam from the get go,im not sure,
idea 2 sounds good i guess ,im not sure any of this effects me at this point but the cutting down on the amount of posters whose majority of posts are one word is a good idea

Give 'em an inch they'll take it a mile.

When I started here you were allowed an avatar right off the bat. I don't see how it added to spam in any particular way, I was told it was because people created many multiple accounts. However I still see that.

This thread isn't for suggestions, It's for voting. ;) The Admin's have made up their minds to allow even this so don't look a gifted horse to closesly in the mouth. ;)


Drakon said:
I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by the first half. :huh:

The standard would pretty much be common sense. It'd be up to the staff to decide what exactly would classify, but most of these would be obvious, such as "Word Association" or "Last thing you.." would be marked as such. Generally, if it's not condusive [sp?] to holding a conversation, then it's probably spam.

In what way will the present posters be impacted by option 1 becoming active?

Ah, thank you, just needed to clarify it a little. :)
 
I like both options, but I don't know about the numbers. Maybe more posts before you can get a big avvy or something. But both sound good, ESPECIALLY 1.
 
twylight said:
Give 'em an inch they'll take it a mile.

When I started here you were allowed an avatar right off the bat. I don't see how it added to spam in any particular way, I was told it was because people created many multiple accounts. However I still see that.

This thread isn't for suggestions, It's for voting. ;) The Admin's have made up their minds to allow even this so don't look a gifted horse to closesly in the mouth. ;)

Patience is a virtue and revenge is a dish best served cold.
 
To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.


These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect:up:
 
vindrow said:
To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.


These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect:up:

You can vote for both!
 
vindrow said:
To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.


These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect:up:
It's a multi-vote poll. :cmad:
 
vindrow said:
To bad we couldn't vote like both options, because to be honest I like them both but since that option wasn't there I went with option 2.


These do sound like great ideas, hope they both go into effect:up:
:( ..
 
i voted for both options. sounds good to me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"