Spiderdevil
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 4, 2012
- Messages
- 4,374
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 58
Flavor of the week.t:
Same thing happened before, he took a swipe at Thor before MOS and Thor 2 made almost as much as MOS did
Flavor of the week.t:
Yeah I think with Momoa cast as Aquaman you can tell which direction they're gonna go with the character. Would love to be proven wrong though.
I wish I knew who else they were looking at for Aquaman.
I'm much more worried about their director for Flash than any of their casting choices
Some say that the potential of losing the rights WAS the reason Man of Steel was even made.
You know, I was originally skeptical about the 400M number. However, if the production budget for the movie actually did approach 300M, then yeah, it becomes plausible. At least if you assume they spent an inordinate amount on marketing, which is believable.
How do you know they didn't?
I saw two major collaborations.
Turkish Airlines
CompareTheMarket
I expect there were a lot more worldwide.
That is just... just... I mean.... wow.
The movie has been out for nearly a month. What do you really expect?!
Same thing happened before, he took a swipe at Thor before MOS and Thor 2 made almost as much as MOS did
The thing that I hate most about Zack Snyder is how pompous he's become since he took on DCEU and the amount of smack talk he's dished out about Marvel over the past 3 years. For a guy whose movies are generally average or below average he sure like to put other people down. That's why I am not going to be behind any of his movies going forward. The sooner WB get rid of this a-hole the better DCEU will become.
And finally daily multipliers are stabilized (it's almost the exact drop that F7 had on the same day -BvS 23.07, F7 23.06-)$800k Tuesday per BO. Domestic now $312.78M.
Zootopia took in $760k. Might pass BvS in the dailies by tomorrow.
$150 M isn't an inordinate amount for a top level tent pole. Both Avengers films, The Force Awakens, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and the first Hobbit film spent $150 M ww on marketing.
I believe so to, but as someone pointed out to me by the time JL is released then Flash and Aquaman will already be deep into filming if not done by then
Probably but Im still holding on hope that at least Suicide Squad won't fail commercially or critically. If that fails then I might be done with the DCEU because then it proves it's not just a Snyder thing.Hate to be pessimistic but I am sure some of the movies (Aquaman, Flash, Shazam) will get cancelled if either of Suicide Squad/Wonderwoman fails
Originally Posted by KangConquers View Post
$150 M isn't an inordinate amount for a top level tent pole. Both Avengers films, The Force Awakens, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and the first Hobbit film spent $150 M ww on marketing.
They should have saved it for TASM2.....
I really don't think Suicide Squad will do better than BvS in terms of worldwide sales.
But the review will be better.
I think the $150 million advertising budget is just a rough guess. I don't think the people writing about the cost of this film actually have a clue as to the advertising budget. I see the $150 million number thrown around for every $200 million+ big budget film these days from AOU, BvS, Good Dinosaur, TomorrowLand, etc. I find it hard to believe they all had the same advertising budget.
Just 3 to 4 years ago the maximum advertising budget I ever heard any film having was $100 million. I don't see how ad budgets could have increased by 50% in such a short period of time.