Explaining what facts? If you are so confident about what you believe then could you explain why theatrical sequels weren't made for the following films after favorable foreign and worldwide grosses? Just in case you haven't done your research like I have sequels were planned for all of these films. Also, Batman Begins and The Incredible Hulk(2008) are not sequels because the movies have nothing to do with the storylines of Hulk/Batman and Robin.
Lost in space Budget(80mil) worldwide gross(136mil)
Van Helsing Budget(160mil) worldwide gross(300mil)
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen Budget(78mil) worldwide gross(179mil)
Godzilla Budget(130mil) worldwide gross(379mil)
Constantine Budget(100mil) worldwide gross(230mil)
Elektra Budget(43mil) worldwide gross(56mil)
Daredevil Budget(78mil) worldwide gross(179mil)
The Hulk Budget(137mil) worldwide gross(245)
Batman and Robin(125mil) worldwide gross(238mil)
Men in black 2 budget(140mil) worldwide gross(441mil)
Spawn Budget(40mil) worldwide gross(87mil)
Star Ship Troopers Budget(105mil) worldwide gross(121mil)
Jurassic Park 3 Budget(93mil) worldwide gross(368mil)
The Punisher Budget(33mil) worldwide gross(54mil)
Starship Troopers had a sequel that went directly to video so it doesn't count.
Most of those films made money but were horrible with a few exceptions and the fan reactions afterword weren't good.
Most of those films made money but were horrible with a few exceptions and the fan reactions afterword weren't good. Men In Black 2 was horrible as was Elektra. It doesn't matter that MIB2 made money cause it was sooooooooooooooo bad not only to critics but almost nobody liked that film. They were sucked in by the brand name from the first film being so good. They are making Jurassic Park 4, Punisher 2. Hulk is getting a makeover because they made the wrong film to maximize the box office, Starship Troopers got 2 sequels but they didn't want to risk the money in theatres again, LXG B & R, Van Helsing & Constantine....give me a break. Trash.
As I stated earlier in the thread, observation of which films get fast tracked sequels reveals that a return of about 2.4 or 2.5X production budget is the line which pretty much guarantees a quick sequel. The lower a film falls below that level of return the dicier its chances of a sequel become.
Just because sequels are announced in the flush of a big opening weekend doesn't mean that they actually happen. When Hulk opened with over $ 60 mil Universal stated that they would make a sequel, but when the final numbers rolled in they decided not to and instead let the rights eventually revert back to Marvel.Let's take FF. It made 56 opening weekend. Shortly after it's opening Avi anounced it would get a sequel. Some films get a sequel based on it's opening #'s. Even with the huge drop off 2nd week, FF still got a sequel. I do not think bottom line #'s figure in the equation as much as you think. SR for example. Go with your 2.5 X's budget. 260 million x 2.5 = 650 million. No way, yet it is getting a sequel rather soon.
DOES anyone know how much Daredevil made on tues,wed, & thur after it's opening weekend. I can't access that info on mojo as I'm not a premiere member. This way we can see how it's holding up during the week. I know DD did 18 million and stayed #1 in it's second week but I think we'll be 20-23 for sure maybe more. Depends on 23.
Another 2.6 million for Ghost Rider on Tuesday per showbiz data.
NOW OVER 70 MILLION WORLDWIDE.![]()
DD made 2.8 million on the same day but much less on Monday and the weekend probably because of the huge snowstorm on the East Coast. Wed it dropped at 1.8-1.9 range.
Bottom line is DD had $ 69.4 million domestic after 10 days. GR will break that easily.GR would have to average less then 3 million a day for next 6 days, not to beat it.
Hell if Charlies Angels got a sequel...anything can. LOL
I realize that I want it to hit 120 million not 103 million.