I love how people are all over Poni for changing his opinion after a second viewing. That's an extremely common thing that I'm willing to say everyone here has done.
that's fine and plausible to say and write as a review for batman v superman. but then don't tell me the next day it's the greatest super hero movie ever made.
Well yeah. It's bad enough being content with "subpar" critical reception, but it's even worse that they're ok with what can only be described as "character assassination"
I feel that Snyder not only doesn't understand these characters but truly feels they are little more than their aesthetic. And if he nails that he's done them justice.
I saw it with what I would consider a GA audience [Repost] I saw it with a much of IMAX execs, IMAX employees and PR people (some of which brought their families). It was a morose atmosphere after it ended. Felt like a funeral procession. That's usually the vibe with stuff like 12 Years a Slave.
Thanks. I stand by my opinion that if you're an adult fan of these characters there's a lot to like here. It was clearly made with the comic book reading crowd in mind.
I feel that Snyder not only doesn't understand these characters but truly feels they are little more than their aesthetic. And if he nails that he's done them justice.
well i didn't read any of the review.
but my guess is they all stay stuck with the light-hearted, cheerful, kid-friendly superman movie / super hero movie.
I edited my response above:
I just read your review. It seems level headed. I think I will in fact enjoy it, I am more of a visual person. Plus I like Frank Miller's dark nihilistic take on Batman. Overall sounds like a slightly above average movie or a C+. I understand you giving the movie a second chance. The fact that you did that only makes your review more authentic to me, because to me, you wanted to give it an honest, thorough look. Thanks for the review.
P.S. Even better. The more adult the better I say. The DC TV shows are for the kids, adults pay to watch the grown up fare lol![]()
you sound like you can't take criticism too well. good place for the misuse of ironic, eh? and i'm not desperate to defend this movie. i am still looking forward to seeing it, but at this point i'd say people whose reviews i respect have tempered my enthusiasm, i hate to say the name, but i tend to agree with devin faraci on most films.
but i do think its an interesting question, should a critic give any piece of art a second chance? but as i also said, it's pretty off topic.
Yep.
Second time I saw Age of Ultron I went from loving it to feeling pretty meh about it. Second time I saw Ant-Man made me like it even more. Changing opinions is common because you can pick up on things that you didn't in your first viewing, and look at the movie knowing what's coming and how it's going to play out.
No no no, I have to stick with my first reaction. That's what I agreed to do when I took this job. If I want to change my opinion after further inspection of anything I cover I should resign immediately. Who do I think I am anyway?
It can still get 80%+ if the next 150 reviews are fresh... Not trolling, just math lol.
well i didn't read any of the review.
but my guess is they all stay stuck with the light-hearted, cheerful, kid-friendly superman movie / super hero movie.
I love how people are all over Poni for changing his opinion after a second viewing. That's an extremely common thing that I'm willing to say everyone here has done.
Matt wants nothing more than this movie to be good. Matt's first time at the movie theater (that he can remember, anyway), was Superman IV. As bad as it was, it was amazing to be a kid, watching a man fly on the big screen. Its the day I fell in love with superheroes. Matt wants his daughter to be able to look at his favorite superhero exactly the same. Instead, she has to grow up in a world where a Superman movie is a bleak and joyless affair.
LMFAO! I used the wrong total, Jesus that's embarrassing... You're right lolMjölnir;33241813 said:If 150 fresh reviews come in it will still only be at 67%. It would be 198 fresh, 98 rotten.
Hmm, the second aspect of it.
Well, yes. If you are a DC fan, you would know that DC very much loves multiverse - and how much freedom they have given to creatives (live action, animated and comics) to reimagine and reinterpret the character they want to.
So, are all those interpretations character assassinations? (Technically they are, since most of them don't resemble the original creations). But, for better or worse, there are fans of these versions. And every version is just as valid as the originals.
I can understand hanging on to one particular iteration. What I can't understand is - how can one claim to be a DC fan when one can't accept that there are multiple iterations/versions of these characters?
(I am not questioning you, just saying).
And it's funny, because comic books, they aren't hard to read. Just sit down, read the comic's that are most popular with fans. Read All-Star Superman, read the O'Neil/Adams run on Batman, watch The Animated Series. Pick out what resonated with fans, and what didn't. If you come across something that fans liked where the characters are different, understand they liked it because it was a subversion of the character, not the actual character.