BatLobster
Trailer Timewarper
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2012
- Messages
- 16,502
- Reaction score
- 10,729
- Points
- 103
Just wanted to say that I can't believe they're really going all the way in with Luke. I mean, I believe it. But it just wasn't something I was expecting at all to see in BOBF. They're really putting their cards on the table for where they're taking this stuff. It's exciting.
I will be honest, I still think he sounds atrocious. His appearance is MUCH improved, but they have to figure out something about that audio. I don't know what. But he sounds like a robot/video game character. At the same time...it kind of suits the way he's behaving as a prequel Jedi...
Which brings me to another point. I do hope that if we're going to continue to tell stories about Luke, we can flesh out some of this attachment stuff. I am 100% certain that Filoni is aware about how crucial that was to Vader's redemption, because it's something he's broken down beautifully before. But if we're going to develop Luke more, then they need to figure out a way to make him emote in a more believable way. Right now he seems suited to be this NPC character, which I guess works for the role he has now. Him trying to remake the Jedi order exactly as it was does seem to track well with TLJ, but I will say that seeing that in action only 5 years after ROTJ does feel jarring to me. With all the pieces they have on the board-- Mando, Grogu, Ahsoka, there's a lot they can explore there. I feel like there is some grey area there, because nowhere in TLJ does Luke ever say that he tried to do things 100% the same. And we know that he comes to view the legacy of the Jedi as failure. Luke's state in TLJ has more to do with him internalizing his own failure with Ben and equating it with the Jedi's failure at large. At least that's how I see it.
All in all, I think there is rich stuff to be explored there. And if it's too much to do it on screen, this still opens all sorts of storytelling opportunities for novels and comics. I have no doubt that with enough creativity, they can build a nice bridge and flesh out Luke's journey between trilogies.
It's too late. They have already been referenced in multiple instances in the Filoni stuff. Maybe you should deal with that.
Nobody's telling you not to have an opinion. But maybe just let Filoni and Favreau do their thing. Filoni is a master of working within parameters that are divisive and making great Star Wars out of it. If you trust in Filoni/Favreau then maybe just try going for the ride. As a wise Jedi once said, let go of your hate.
I will be honest, I still think he sounds atrocious. His appearance is MUCH improved, but they have to figure out something about that audio. I don't know what. But he sounds like a robot/video game character. At the same time...it kind of suits the way he's behaving as a prequel Jedi...
Which brings me to another point. I do hope that if we're going to continue to tell stories about Luke, we can flesh out some of this attachment stuff. I am 100% certain that Filoni is aware about how crucial that was to Vader's redemption, because it's something he's broken down beautifully before. But if we're going to develop Luke more, then they need to figure out a way to make him emote in a more believable way. Right now he seems suited to be this NPC character, which I guess works for the role he has now. Him trying to remake the Jedi order exactly as it was does seem to track well with TLJ, but I will say that seeing that in action only 5 years after ROTJ does feel jarring to me. With all the pieces they have on the board-- Mando, Grogu, Ahsoka, there's a lot they can explore there. I feel like there is some grey area there, because nowhere in TLJ does Luke ever say that he tried to do things 100% the same. And we know that he comes to view the legacy of the Jedi as failure. Luke's state in TLJ has more to do with him internalizing his own failure with Ben and equating it with the Jedi's failure at large. At least that's how I see it.
All in all, I think there is rich stuff to be explored there. And if it's too much to do it on screen, this still opens all sorts of storytelling opportunities for novels and comics. I have no doubt that with enough creativity, they can build a nice bridge and flesh out Luke's journey between trilogies.
So I should see things from YOUR narrow view? Am I not allowed to have opinions?
Guess what. The sequels sucked. I hate them. HATE HATE HATE them. They completely ruined everything that Star Wars was about. I don't want any future Star Wars story to ever reference them again.
That's my opinion. Deal with it.
It's too late. They have already been referenced in multiple instances in the Filoni stuff. Maybe you should deal with that.
Nobody's telling you not to have an opinion. But maybe just let Filoni and Favreau do their thing. Filoni is a master of working within parameters that are divisive and making great Star Wars out of it. If you trust in Filoni/Favreau then maybe just try going for the ride. As a wise Jedi once said, let go of your hate.
Last edited: