TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,745
- Reaction score
- 15,007
- Points
- 103
They may not show the origins again, but they don't have to with a rebooted cast. Same thing with Tom Holland.
nah disney's bob igor said he was inspired by the idea about what fox was doing withthe new mutant as horror storand looking atthe Idea of other genres I'm sure there will be room for gritty if he'll allow horror to be a thing .sure if you want a watered down Punisher, LC, JJ, and Daredevil
so I got this from EPN..tv which got this from Dead line spoke top someone that was close the deal and sorry this was netflix. & that all we things we thought and it was indeed for the reason's said in previous pages netflix wanted sole ownership of the marvel shows. and they shut it down cause they didn't own them the actors or the shows. it's is indeed marvel's call they hired the actors and the shows are theirs.
Detail in the 5th segment of the video below & the Deadline article confriming it
![]()
New Fortnite and Far Cry Games Announced! - The Rundown - Electric Playground
1.2K views 16 hours ago Published on 12/05/2018
#PlayForever #Fortnite #FarCry Today in the Rundown, we have the first details on a game-making new mode for Fortnite, and an all-new Far Cry project from Ubisoft! We We also get the latest on Red Dead Online, switch over to some good news about Metroid, discuss the latest on the cancellation of Marvel's Daredevil, smuggle a new season of Narcos, and finally, beam up new details on the return of Star Trek's Captain Picard!
Confriming the video above
‘Daredevil’: Netflix Turned A Blind Eye To Viewer Demand By Canceling Marvel Series
on Dec 4, 2018 5:30 pm 81 comments
When Netflix executives decided to cancel the Marvel series Daredevil, it turned a blind eye to viewer demand. That’s evident in the latest numbers from Parrot Analytics which reveal that Daredevil ranked fourth last week in viewer demand among all digital originals in the U.S. across all streaming platforms. Demand for the sightless superhero series was surpassed only by three shows (Narcos, The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina and Stranger Things, all from Netflix) during… READ
source: The Electric Playground Network | EPN & Deadline
seeing that it was via EPN.tv where I found out about it and saw others that sourced it as well .... be side's it took me time to find the deadline one it has alot of pages of the news on the tv side. it took 14 pages from that actual source.to find just the day after.Is it so hard to just post a Deadline link and text?
Also Netflix wanting sole ownership of the Netflix content makes no sense. They can't own solely own characters or properties that already belong to Marvel.
Is it so hard to just post a Deadline link and text?
Also Netflix wanting sole ownership of the Marvel content makes no sense. They can't own solely own characters or properties that already belong to Marvel.
your on the money, sadly this is the case and when you look at it all, the same thing will happen to Dc since warnner own's the cw and they have their own streaming service for that . and now Dc own's their own streaming service as well. Point is with net flix they got parnoid & petty over it.Netflix knows this, which is why they canceled this show, they would rather focus on shows they own outright then shows that promote a competitor's brand. These shows would be around if Disney did not decide to get into the streaming business.
Vincent D'OnofrioVerified account @vincentdonofrio Dec 6
I'm in such an odd business. Don't feel bad folks it makes no sense. 'Daredevil’ Cancelation Is Bad News for Netflix, as Data Reveals Demand Still Huge
![]()
‘Daredevil’ Cancelation Is Bad News for Netflix, as Data Demand Still Huge...
Accordingto a new study,"Dare Devil" interest remains high even after the shows cancelation Read more
Yahoo.com
2:01 PM - 6 Dec 2018
496 replies1,649 retweets8,011 likes
Dude Punisher is not showing up on Disney+nah disney's bob igor said he was inspired by the idea about what fox was doing withthe new mutant as horror storand looking atthe Idea of other genres I'm sure there will be room for gritty if he'll allow horror to be a thing .
the actors are free to be usedDisney+ deosnt want violent content such as Punisher cie ...
-Disney+ cant reprise characters from Netflix without rebooting these characters
-But Feige takes care about coherences of his universe and rebooting will make no sense
-They said Dardevil will appear in futures Marvel projects so Disney+ would probably bring DD back in MCU
What are the issues
Cap and cie will travel to back (Avengers' events) and retconning Defenders'event ???
This clause doesn't seem to preclude actors from these shows from appearing in other non-Netflix Marvel projects; both Stan Lee and Alfre Woodard have appeared as different characters on both sides of the Netflix/Marvel Studios divide
THR also notes that The Punisher - whose second season is said to debut in January - was not part of the initial Marvel/Netflix deal, and therefore may not (or may) be subject to this clause. However since Punisher debuted in Daredevil before being spun off, these contract terms are very unclear.
![]()
Credit: Netflix/Marvel Television
Although Daredevil, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist don't have a future at Netflix - they may not be appearing anywhere for the next two years due to a clause in the Walt Disney Company's original 2013 agreement with Netflix, according to Deadline.
The Hollywood trade reports that the characters which debuted in the shows - as well as the shows themselves - are effectively mothballed from any non-Netflix projects for two years from the date of their cancellation. If we go by the dates their cancellations were announced, these clauses would elapse October 15, 2020 for Iron Fist, October 22, 2020 for Luke Cage, and November 29, 2020 for Daredevil.
A similiar window of exclusivity for DVD and Blu-ray editions of Marvel's Netflix shows has led to those physical releases coming out 18 to 24 months after their streaming debut.
This clause doesn't seem to preclude actors from these shows from appearing in other non-Netflix Marvel projects; both Stan Lee and Alfre Woodard have appeared as different characters on both sides of the Netflix/Marvel Studios divide.
THR also notes that The Punisher - whose second season is said to debut in January - was not part of the initial Marvel/Netflix deal, and therefore may not (or may) be subject to this clause. However since Punisher debuted in Daredevil before being spun off, these contract terms are very unclear.
Marvel's initial deal with Netflix was announced October 2013, with their flagship show - Daredevil - debuting in April 2015.
I love how Charlie's face in the article perfectly says "wtf you mean ? "
But ultimately, what is gained by rebooting them outright? The core story is the same. Do we always want to see the same 2 or 3 stories covered for Daredevil? Do we need to see Danny come back to NY from Kun Lun or Luke break out of prison again? These stories have been done. When the MCU introduced us to T'Challa, he was already established with his own backstory. Granted, there was not a Black Panther show done before CW, but you can approach the Defenders the same exact way, only with the shows acting as backstory. I would rather see them approached like BP in that way. We never see T'Challa earn or train for the mantle of Black Panther. He just is Black Panther and we moved forward. Matt is already DD. Luke and Danny started HFH. Jessica is a PI. Etc. Just start them there and move forward. It's not exactly rocket science and the general audience wouldn't be anymore confused than they were for T'Challa, and fans can use the show for backstory to make it better for them. It's win/win. Even in this model, the actor playing the Defenders wouldn't ultimately matter (though I would prefer to keep Cox and the DD cast myself).
Not so much for Daredevil, but there is a lot for Luke Cage and Iron Fist. The Netflix versions of both weren't great or comic accurate to begin with, to the point where they never really seemed to understand the characters.
A rebooted version (say a Power Man and Iron Fist movie) could be a buddy cop style movie about them teaming up for the first time and giving the audiences a new take on their origins that flow better and inform the characters' personalities and motivations much better.
Why couldn't they just run with that now? Again, why even bother rebooting? Just have them be a buddy team-up show and move on. You want to overhaul how the characters act, write them differently. Like any new creative team does when they take something over.
Except I don't want them to be a show, I want a thorough reboot as a movie with more comic accurate castings and portrayals, and without any of the baggage these shows bring. Fiege thinks along these lines, which is why Spiderman got rebooted before joining the MCU, and the same will happen to X-Men and FF4.
The problem with just using the old actors/continuity is nothing will flow properly. These aren't comics. Characters can't just start acting radically different (and even in comics with new creative teams, characters have some consistency). MCU Iron Man generally acts the same in his multiple appearances. Same goes for Captain America and the rest. These Netflix portrayals of Luke and Danny are best forgotten because they aren't good or comic accurate in the slightest. The results speak for themselves because the shows never really clicked with the public or took off like they hypothetically could've.
When asked if he had signed the #SaveDaredevil campaign, Cox revealed that he in fact had recently done so. "I wasn’t sure about adding my email because I’m not very technically savvy, and I didn’t want to suddenly put my email online," the actor said. "I don’t know if it was visible or not. But what I did do is I made a fake email for my two-year-old daughter, and she signed it [laughter]."