You know Stephanie Brown? She was you're Robin for a while?
Co-write with Goyer? Personally I would like Nolan still involved. I mean it seems Ben could be in control of the Batman franchise. Maybe have Jonathan help out.
Affleck should write the Batfilms himself. He can do it.
Ok then. By the way how's Barbara doing?
If I had to pick ANYONE from the original TDK trilogy to do the Superman reboot/ other superhero movies, it'd be Jonah. Caviezel is more Batmanish than even Bale, and I think Jonah has a warmth and wit to his writing even more than Chris does. Though I do think Chris is the one with the "wilder" ideas (yeah, I know Jonah wrote the story that Memento is based on)
What I like about POI is the humor feels organic, like the narrative itself stops and chuckles at the absurdity of it all, before playing the silly concept straight.
It's the juxtaposition of hyperseriousness and warm camp, for lack of a better word that makes POI work, IMHO. It's rather balanced, I guess.
I feel like he'd know when to have fun and when to amp up the seriousness of the events at hand. I feel like Goyer tries to be serious, but crams in humor in places that don't belong because he struggles with such a delicate balance.
He can attempt to write another version of Batman but we have already got his interpretation of who Batman is and his capabilities. We have had Goyers take on Batman.
At this point it is this way.By all means respond if you disagree, but I feel like the fan backlash over David Goyer really only started with MOS.
Before that, he was the screenwriter who could do no wrong. After MOS, Goyer took on the blame as the go-to scapegoat for anything wrong with Nolan-associated superhero films.
Thoughts?
At this point it is this way.
Suppose Goyer wrote and directed Citizen Kane and Nolan had story credit, his fans would go "ZOOOOGGMMMZZZZZZ Nolan is the greatest human being in the history of mankind! He has made yet another masterpiece".
And at the same time Nolan wrote and directed Gigli and Goyer had story credit, Nolan fans would go, "Damn Goyer, he has besmirched the legacy of Nolan, he is the reason the film is bad, Nolan could do no wrong."
When the first Ben Affleck Batman movie comes out, the fanboys will whine and cry that they don't get to see BatGod on the big screen.
And what makes you think we won't be seeing bat god?
Ben Affleck is a a talented and effective writer and director and thus I expect him to develop a complex character than a "badass" in the mould of Jor-El, Khan Noonien-Singh, or Tony Stark.
I'm willing to wager, if you want, but I doubt either of us will remember this by the time Affleck develops his own movie.
Your words imply that "badass" and "complex character" are mutually exclusive.
You also seem to be under the impression that "batgod" is synonymous to these three characters you listed above.
Far as to say you are wrong on both counts but I was just curious if you were basing your prediction on something other than a personal inclination(like if you've heard something).
As for my prediction. I think alot of the batgod prerequisites can be solved on the level of direction. And I think Affleck is simply better and more respective of the source material than nolan. Whether or not "batgod" as you define him is present on screen soon, something more inclined with what I see in the source material will no doubt be upon us is my personal inclination.
When the first Ben Affleck Batman movie comes out, the fanboys will whine and cry that they don't get to see BatGod on the big screen.
I think that's more likely in the BvS film. They will cry that BatGod couldn't defeat Superman.
And yes, I'm confident that in the versus portion of the film, Superman will defeat Batman.
So how about a wager?