The Amazing Spider-Man Dunst "Definitely on board" Spider-Man 4

[mclay18]

Dunst has said she was done with Spider-Man. She does not like to play MJ. The only reason she comes back is because she gets casted in crappy movies. I guarantee you that if she was in a big film after her contract ran out, she would not return. Dunst is a tool.

That's awfully harsh. When Dunst signed on to do the first Spider-Man movie, she and Tobey signed three-picture deals. So if she didn't like the scripts for the second and third pics, she'd have to do it anyway or force being sued by Sony for breach of contract. And I think she did the movies just to have fun and to have something to fund her smaller projects in between (Mona Lisa Smile and Marie Antoinette, anyone?).

Now that she has a new contract for SM-4, maybe Sony told her the story for the fourth pic and she liked it -- hence her return. I do think her return was pivoted on working with Raimi and Maguire again, and she could use the cash

 

[Pfeiffer-Pfan]

That's awfully harsh. When Dunst signed on to do the first Spider-Man movie, she and Tobey signed three-picture deals. So if she didn't like the scripts for the second and third pics, she'd have to do it anyway or force being sued by Sony for breach of contract. And I think she did the movies just to have fun and to have something to fund her smaller projects in between (Mona Lisa Smile and Marie Antoinette, anyone?).

Now that she has a new contract for SM-4, maybe Sony told her the story for the fourth pic and she liked it -- hence her return. I do think her return was pivoted on working with Raimi and Maguire again, and she could use the cash

Completely agree...

I actually think that she is a pretty good actress regardless.

 

[EHTNAMTAB]

New York, Times Square, City that never sleeps

I'm thinking Electro

 

[luke1234]

Now that shes back, she may spill the beans on some plot details. Looking forward to future interviews.

 

[SpeterMan3]

:facepalm

 

[Mrs. Sawyer]

Haha you're going to be pretty disappointed.

 

[Ol'Canucklehead]

Haha you're going to be pretty disappointed.

.........I know

 

[chaseter]

I am all for 2,3,4, and 10

 

[chaseter]

That's awfully harsh. When Dunst signed on to do the first Spider-Man movie, she and Tobey signed three-picture deals. So if she didn't like the scripts for the second and third pics, she'd have to do it anyway or force being sued by Sony for breach of contract. And I think she did the movies just to have fun and to have something to fund her smaller projects in between (Mona Lisa Smile and Marie Antoinette, anyone?).

Now that she has a new contract for SM-4, maybe Sony told her the story for the fourth pic and she liked it -- hence her return. I do think her return was pivoted on working with Raimi and Maguire again, and she could use the cash

Do you not remember all the crap she caused after SM2? She didn't want to be remembered as MJ. She didn't want to go down in history as her biggest work being in a superhero movie. But, she comes crawling back to do SM3, which ironically caused most fans of the series to hate her even more. She is no where near what MJ is and should be and keeping dead weight in a series just because she was in the first 3 is a lame excuse. I want this movie to be the last with Tobey and Kirsten. Tobey is pretty old now anyways.

 

[HughJackFan420]

i for one am glad that Dunst is back on board. i hate when they change actors for characters in sequels. even though i never agreed to her casting since Spidey 1. i mean MJ in the comics is super hot and Kirsten Dunst is...well...eh

 

[SpaceWay2009]

LOL...That's funny!

 

[Venom 1988]

Now that shes back, she may spill the beans on some plot details. Looking forward to future interviews.

Only good thing about her return

 

[Spiderine]

Of course she is on board. This is no surprise. She's not missing out on that huge paycheck.

 

[Dog Logan]

I am all for 2,3,4, and 10

I'm all for number 10 if I get to be first in line, and if number 2 is in order first.

 

[Mrs. Sawyer]

i for one am glad that Dunst is back on board. i hate when they change actors for characters in sequels. even though i never agreed to her casting since Spidey 1. i mean MJ in the comics is super hot and Kirsten Dunst is...well...eh

I'll be honest though. While, I don't think Dunst is bad-looking, she's not Mary Jane, at all.

 

[TheVileOne]

I'm glad she's back. I'd rather have her back then re-cast the character or have to work in the lame Gwen Stacy we were forced to deal with.

If anything, it pisses off a bunch of idiot, sexist posters here. So that's good.

 

[SpeterMan3]

Opened up to my home page (Yahoo) and found this. Nothing new, just you know.. interesting.
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/access-hollywood-spider-man-4.html

 

[Milu]

She's actually said it twice (to Peter in both 1 and 2).

But yeah, wouldn't be opposed to hearing it more often .

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

New York, Times Square, City that never sleeps

I'm thinking Electro

That's possible, if you ask me. Would be awesome, that's for sure.

 

[QWoods]

lmao this thread is funny

I agree with Kirsten gaining some wait and hopefully getting some curves like Megan Fox did for Transformers.

 

[TheVileOne]

You mean Megan Fox buying boobs right?

Good God.

 

[Dog Logan]

I'll be honest though. While, I don't think Dunst is bad-looking, she's not Mary Jane, at all.

She was great in the first movie, superb. Back then I'd have said she was the best love interest on film to date.

 

[SpeterMan3]

The "person" in the ad in the bottom right corner reminds me of Kirsten.

 

[TheSlag]

With the announcement that Snaggle Tooth...errr.. Flappy Jacks... errr.. Kirsten is back as MJ (GweMJ*cough*)... I truely fear for SM4 and the franchise as a whole.

Assuming, that Kirsten was actually "wooed" back as having an intricate role in SM4, and NOT simply coming back for the Cashcow Paycheck that is SM4 for her. And a BIG ASSUMPTION that is too.

But assuming it is true, that Kirsten has an intricate role in SM4, I fear. I fear because that means MORE all about "that girl". More at the expensive of Dr. Connors and the Connors Clan's development. Especially the development when it comes to Peter, as his adopted family he never truely had.

I fear that MJ's role in the film will once again give us a watered down villain and the villains Alter-ego. I fear it will once again, give us more emo Peter, or Saturday Night Peter (staying alive.. strutting his stuff), or pouty/crying face Peter.. over MJ and his/their relationship.

SHEEESH.. has Raimi even read one comic??? Just ONE???

I fear storyline will be sacrificed to satisfy the OVER inflated ego on one Kirsten (Snaggle Flappy ) Dunst.

The ONLY storyline that MJ could add to significantly, that would not simply be another spin/reshash of the WB dramatics we have seen in SM1-SM3 with Peter/MJ is.... Dare I Dream... MJ's death (in place of Gwen's death in this perverse timeline Raimi has spun). And of course... NOT at the hands of a Goblin either.. so much for the "Goblin Legacy". (Pity)

But I can only IMAGINE the crying that would come on these boards IF the "precious" MJ were to die, instead of Gwen. So... I DOUBT SERIOUSLY that Raimi has the balls, nor the will.. to be "Dragged to Hell" by the fans if he DARES to follow such a storyline (pun intended).

So... get our your WB "hankies" my fans... Good Times are here AGAIN (*NOT*)... with the signing of our BELOVED Snaggle...errr.. Flappy... errrr... Kirsten... to the "hollow"ed role of GweMJ...errrr.. MJ.

And by the way Kirsten.. I will NOT hold my breath waiting on my Christmas Card from you this year. t:

 

[The Joker]

Ah Slag, I sincerely hope you're around for the duration of this. Need at least one of the old school around here.