Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]498679[/split]
Just to clarify, we're not talking about actual scripts and we're not talking about the 'Josh Trank' comments.
It's a discussion by someone who claims to have seen a September 2013 and January 2014 script. I'd put it at roughly 50/50 that it's legit.
It fits everything we know or have seen so far (but any hoaxer would have access to that, so we can't, for example, point to anything that was unknown at the time of publication and revealed after).
There's a lot of very specific discussion of the differences between the two scripts, and that is the primary focus of the discussion. It would be an odd/creative approach by a hoaxer, but that doesn't mean this isn't an odd, creative hoaxer.
And even if this is legit, things are likely to have changed quite a bit since January of 2014 (and that also makes me wonder why a hoaxer wouldn't claim to have something more recent).
IF it is legit, it's an unfortunately boring story with some pretty bad choices, characterizations, and clichéd elements that will sound familiar to anyone who has seen the previous FF films and pretty much any other film ever, but one small bright spot isAn involvement with Annihilus - though it seems like we probably won't see much of him (he plays a role that is both comically and depressingly similar to the Thanos role in Avengers - in fact this story sounds like a mash-up of Tim Story FF1 and Avengers with the worst elements taken from each.) .
Yeah I'm on the fence as to whether this guy is for real or a hoaxer. They do basically reveal they are with OTOY, without expliitly saying so, and some of the technical detail they go into seems more informed (and specific, the non 4k render etc) than I'd expect from a hoax. Citing 2 diferent scripts is also a curious move for a hoax.
That being said I would have thought a key plot point worth a mention would have covered why the Thing is being dropped from a plane (presumably a military op on some base to take out the baddies shooting at him). That may have been an addition they didn't work on though (a rewrite for the reshoots perhaps). The Black suit mission is another point that doesn't seem to be covered.
I think, considering the source, I'd err on the side of caution all the same and consider this a hoax until proven otherwise.
If it is for real then I agree, it's a mess.
Yeah I'm on the fence as to whether this guy is for real or a hoaxer. They do basically reveal they are with OTOY, without expliitly saying so, and some of the technical detail they go into seems more informed (and specific, the non 4k render etc) than I'd expect from a hoax. Citing 2 diferent scripts is also a curious move for a hoax.
That being said I would have thought a key plot point worth a mention would have covered why the Thing is being dropped from a plane (presumably a military op on some base to take out the baddies shooting at him). That may have been an addition they didn't work on though (a rewrite for the reshoots perhaps). The Black suit mission is another point that doesn't seem to be covered.
I think, considering the source, I'd err on the side of caution all the same and consider this a hoax until proven otherwise.
If it is for real then I agree, it's a mess.
I wondered about that but I suspect that the Thing drop is from some sort of piece when the military are testing them for use as weapons, and as such the scene while cool looking is not really an important part of the movie's storyline. Also the scripts he is talking about are from well before shooting started so things can change, and one rumour that has been around a lot is that the film was too talky and not enough action, a living weapons test type action scene addition would be an each addition to help up the action quotient without effecting the main storyline.
The person who claims to have the script does say
they are being used by the military to fight "mutants" in the Sep draft and "freaks" in the Jan draft. Which sounds like a terrible idea, but it fits many things we've seen and heard up until this point.
If they were looking to up the amount of action adding in the Thing attack scene from the trailer would have been an easy way for them to go during the reshoots if they had limited use of the main cast. From the looks of things all the action is with the CGI Thing and a bunch of stuntmen and so didn't require any of the main cast, then they just had to get the "real" principle actors in to be filmed while looking at monitors.
The script leak is also from 4Chan. 95% positive it's a hoax. Particularly since we haven't heard anything about a certain character appearing aside from a brief interview with AMC. That's the big red flag that it's a fake. This close to release is when the cast list on IMDB is finalized.
I heard a new rumor that Josh Trank is going door to door to all people dissing him on the internet and unleashing his hounds upon them. What a jerk!
Oh it's definitely unlikely (fun to discuss, though, since there have been a few 4chan plot leaks in the past). That said, IMDB cast lists are almost as bad a source of information as 4chan. I'm still waiting for that deleted scene with Jim Carrey as Cletus Kasady, and Christian Bale most certainly did not star in the game Kingdom Hearts: Birth By Sleep.
The best IMDB info to date is still Aunt May / Carnage in Spiderman 3As for the script leak, well, knowing the 4chan reputation, it's very likely a fake, but the strange thing is... was it really Josh Trank who posted on their site ? His picture was a very bad picture taken from some kind of webcam. Hard to tell if it is photoshoped or not. No sane director would go to a place like 4chan to scream and moan ! But, well, if Trank was sane and logical, we wouldn't have such a strange and shameful production. So, who knows...
The best IMDB info to date is still Aunt May / Carnage in Spiderman 3As for the script leak, well, knowing the 4chan reputation, it's very likely a fake, but the strange thing is... was it really Josh Trank who posted on their site ? His picture was a very bad picture taken from some kind of webcam. Hard to tell if it is photoshoped or not. No sane director would go to a place like 4chan to scream and moan ! But, well, if Trank was sane and logical, we wouldn't have such a strange and shameful production. So, who knows...
I'd be utterly amazed if Trank really was dumb enough to a) go to 4chan and commit career suicide, and b) post a '###k you' photo as proof he was indeed there. At least as some random poster there's plausible deniability (in the unlikely event it was him). Providing proof is just insane.
I have seen that webcam photo too and I would think it is a fake (that kind of thing isn't that hard to do and pass off as convincing).
If it was Trank there, however unlikely I think that would be, and the studios know or figure out it was indeed him, he is done.
The way he turns cartoonish red before lighting on fire is really odd looking.
Amazing.
The way he turns cartoonish red before lighting on fire is really odd looking.