starscream22
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 31
Q: "What if we say no?"
A: "Then go watch Ant-man again!"
A: "Then go watch Ant-man again!"
"What if we say no?"
"Say yes."
Josh Trank's mantra for filming this movie!
Being honest, although I'm postive on the trailer, that line made me properly cringe, could've at least made him shrug and say it somewhat comedically
I found the trailer quite enjoyable I laughed out loud with the flying car bit. Not in love with Doom's looks at the end. He's somehow become part of the n-zone they had the same rivers of green on the planet. However Kebbell voice that was excellent, he looks to be quite good in the role.
I liked both of the new trailers and the new footage. I was beginning to wonder if much doesn't happen since the older trailers and TV spots kept using the same handful of footage.
I can't get over how the CGI looks no better than Tim Story's movies.
I can't get over how the CGI looks no better than Tim Story's movies.
You have to remember that this was budgeted at $100,000,000 including 3D conversion. It ended up costing more, but that's because of the reshoots. This was always going to look cheaper than a typical modern superhero film.
As miscast as this film is in general, Tim Blake Nelson as Suit Man is probably the worst. Friggin' Wayne Knight would have been a better Mole Man, especially if they were going Ultimate.
Which begs the question - if this isn't just a cheap rights grab, why give the Fantastic Four such a low budget? They deserve, and require, a higher budget than X-Men, yet they got significantly less.
I just can't believe a group of people actually sat down and decided that this was the coolest and most striking design they could come up with.
He looks like he belongs in Beast Machines.
Amazing how this looks like a freaking masterpiece in retrospect.
![]()
I can't get over how the CGI looks no better than Tim Story's movies.
Because the previous movies in no way justified a higher budget.