psylockolussus
Anchor of Earth-X
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2004
- Messages
- 59,529
- Reaction score
- 10,213
- Points
- 103
Actually for 62 minutes so yes, 2/3 of the film. The accident scene was really good especially when we saw their powers! It was pretty intense!
Kate Mara on Tuesday's Live discussing her Comic Con experience with her cast members.
[YT]watch?v=8DIzctOYPgQ[/YT]
I feel kind of depressed now![]()

Now will users that believed him like Cyclops admit he has wrong is the question ? Probably not
After seeing the movie, no doubt that Fox wrecked it, Trank's movie is there for like the first half, almost two thirds, from then on, you can see the hack job on the last third of the movie.
SURPRISE SURPRISE !
Wouldn't that be classified as the "They'll fix it all in the sequel" argument?From the sounds of the reviews, I really hope this does well enough to warrent a sequel without the studo interference. It seems to have a lot of unfulfilled potential.
Lol at the blame it on Fox approach.
Lol at the blame it on Fox approach.
Ironically it sounds like it might have been more successful if it actually had been Chronicle 2 instead of FF.Just got back from seeing this. Overall, the movie isn't bad. It isn't good either. It was just mediocre and disappointing. There were a few good aspects (casting, character relationships) that left a bitter taste in my mouth because it proved to me that this could have been a good movie. I would point out the story and script as the main factors why the movie did not live up to it's potential. The story was uninspired. Also, the dialogue was bland and did nothing for the characterization of the uh, characters. The CGI was also not up to par with the demands of the story.
Finally, The movie felt like it hated being a superhero movie and that it was sulking the entire time in telling the story of the fantastic four.
Sidenote:
*The design for dr. doom was horrendous. Of all the things to drop the ball on, they dropped it on something as simple as doom's design.
Ironically it sounds like it might have been more successful if it actually had been Chronicle 2 instead of FF.
So, from what I'm hearing this movie is VERY comparable to The Wolverine. A good/great first half and then turns into a conventional studio superhero film in the second half and ruins the tone set up in the first half...is that accurate?
I know, right?
Like we're all fully aware of Fox's terrible track record with interfering but let's not even start the whole 'Trank made a great film until Fox stuck their nose in' narrative. We have absolutely no idea what Trank's own third act entailed and for all we know, it was even worse.
Fox didn't just back the guy the whole way through pre-production, and the majority of the actual production, then suddenly changed their minds. They got involved because, by all accounts, principal photography was a mess that resulted in a sub-par film that they and Kinberg tried to salvage (and apparently didn't).
Now don't get me wrong, they shouldn't have given the greenlight to it in the first place but let's not make Fox a total scapegoat for Trank's own failings. This glorious mess was a group job.
Like we're all fully aware of Fox's terrible track record with interfering but let's not even start the whole 'Trank made a great film until Fox stuck their nose in' narrative. We have absolutely no idea what Trank's own third act entailed and for all we know, it was even worse.
Fox didn't just back the guy the whole way through pre-production, and the majority of the actual production, then suddenly changed their minds. They got involved because, by all accounts, principal photography was a mess that resulted in a sub-par film that they and Kinberg tried to salvage (and apparently didn't).
Now don't get me wrong, they shouldn't have given the greenlight to it in the first place but let's not make Fox a total scapegoat for Trank's own failings. This glorious mess was a group job.
I didnt know that The Thing had a specific "iconic" sound.
Chicklis sounded like Chicklis to me even after he became the Thing. Just a bit raspier and gruffer and deeper.
So, from what I'm hearing this movie is VERY comparable to The Wolverine. A good/great first half and then turns into a conventional studio superhero film in the second half and ruins the tone set up in the first half...is that accurate?
I've seen a few reviewers say they have adr the domashev out of the film to actually name him doom can this be confirmed.
Fox owns the film rights to the Fantastic Four.
The current Fantastic Four characters are the property of Fox until they either sale, trade or allow them to go back to Marvel.
So, from what I'm hearing this movie is VERY comparable to The Wolverine. A good/great first half and then turns into a conventional studio superhero film in the second half and ruins the tone set up in the first half...is that accurate?