-JKR-
Superhero
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 5,327
- Reaction score
- 2,066
- Points
- 78
Really? Did they have a film that got a rotten rating. And we shouldn't talk about your person opinion as it has no bearing in public consensus.
Dude, I don't care about public consensus. It doesn't make a movie better or worse for me. What I care about is the movies themselves. And for me Thor: The Dark World is a weak movie, and their recent Doctor Strange is pretty bland and forgettable. This whole brand fidelity thing going on is simply stupid. The key to a great movie is having a talented creative team/filmmaker involved, an interesting and clear vision, and a studio which allows said people to execute said vision without dumbing it down.
Gore Verbinski directing a comic book adaptation is, in my opinion, something to be excited about (unless you hate his movies), and it doesn't matter whether he's working at Marvel Studios or at Twentieth Century Fox.
A studio exec's job is to put the right pieces in place and greenlight the right projects, with the right talent attached. Fox, Marvel, Disney, Warner Bros., Alcon, Lionsgate... it all doesn't matter when you've got those right pieces in place.
Alcon produced a dumb and unnecessary Point Break remake, but also Blade Runner 2049, which is in my opinion one of the finest sequels ever made.
And whatever you can say about about Twentieth Century Fox, they've already proven many people wrong with Deadpool and Logan (and other movies, not related to comic books), so there's no reason to point at this as a trainwreck in the making just because the movie will be preceded by the Fox fanfare.
Last edited:


doing x-men related film should be good news.Channing tatum has passion for gambit.while i knew him from animatged show and not comics that still gets my respect.but again 1990's version was good to get new people into X-men while i feel comics had more depth to them.
t:

logic, man.