Marvolo
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 47,795
- Reaction score
- 10,771
- Points
- 103
That isn't the point. The idea that Sansa would kill a Stark is ridiculous, as is the idea of her getting pregnant by a Bolton. So they either have her knocked up by Ramsay, and have a kid she shouldn't have. Or she aborts a baby, and does something no Stark would likely do. Not even Mr. Shock himself would do that. When you do something GRRM would probably shake his head to, its probably not a good idea.
And you act like this was the only possible way for her story to go, when in fact this is not where her story should be. I get change, I support most of them. Not when it fundamentally changes the character's arc.
I've seen nothing in the show that leads me to believe that Sansa wouldnt abort a baby put in her by Ramsay or that Starks are somehow morally opposed of abortion. Her child might have Stark blood in it, but it would carry the Bolton name, which would disgust any Stark so honestly I have zero problem believing a Stark would abort it. I doubt that they all are honorable to a fault like dear ol dead Ned.
As for where her story should be, it seems that the story and major players are going to be converging on the North so this may be exactly where her story is supposed to be for the ending D&D have planned. I'm sure D&D have a reason for taking her story in this direction. And imo something bad involving Sansa shaking Theon out of his apathy is more compelling thann something involving some character we don't care about it.