Game of Thrones - Book Readers' Thread - - - - Part 21

Status
Not open for further replies.
ЯɘvlveR;32166071 said:
sansa knows he's lord commander, brienne knows in the watch. i'd imagine they'll meet and put two and two together.

She also knows that Ramsay knows that she knows.
 
She also knows that Ramsay knows that she knows.
and? we're getting a battle of ice for a reason, and i highly doubt that it's because the other northern lords have taken offense to what their current liege lord might have said to the lord commander. the boltons wouldn't need the entire north to attack the wall. so, what reason would the other lords have to take part in the battle? sansa would be a good reason.

sansa's going north to be taken in by the umbers.
 
the boltons would certainly need all they could get to attack the wall... the wildlings are just outside it.
 
ЯɘvlveR;32166099 said:
and? we're getting a battle of ice for a reason, and i highly doubt that it's because the other northern lords have taken offense to what their current liege lord might have said to the lord commander. the boltons wouldn't need the entire north to attack the wall. so, what reason would the other lords have to take part in the battle? sansa would be a good reason.

sansa's going north to be taken in by the umbers.

Tell me where I said that the northern lords were going to war with Ramsay over Jon's honour? That's an assumption you made, not what I said. All I said was that Sansa was aware that Ramsay would know where she's going. But I'll humour you. Why other reason would the other lords have to take part in the battle? Why, to kill the Boltons while their attention is focused on the Watch and then crown Rickon when it is done. Manderly and ****sebane Umber plan to do the same thing during the book version of the Battle in Ice.
 
the boltons would certainly need all they could get to attack the wall... the wildlings are just outside it.
because the wildlings are going to help the watch. right.
 
Last edited:
Tell me where I said that the northern lords were going to war with Ramsay over Jon's honour? That's an assumption you made, not what I said. All I said was that Sansa was aware that Ramsay would know where she's going. But I'll humour you. Why other reason would the other lords have to take part in the battle? Why, to kill the Boltons while their attention is focused on the Watch and then crown Rickon when it is done. Manderly and ****sebane Umber plan to do the same thing during the book version of the Battle in Ice.
that's not an assumption i made, that's i hypothetical i gave you because for some reason, you guys think sansa's not going north. she's going south to go where, exactly? to be harbored by theon's warm hearted father?

there's no logical reason for the umbers to be involved AT ALL unless sansa's involved whether they have rickon or not. none. that's the point.

and we're not talking about the books. we're talking about the show.
 
ЯɘvlveR;32166157 said:
because the wildlings are going to help the watch. right.

the **** are you talking about? the wildlings will help JON.

:loco:
 
ЯɘvlveR;32166161 said:
that's not an assumption i made, that's i hypothetical i gave you because for some reason, you guys think sansa's not going north. she's going south to go where, exactly? to be harbored by theon's warm hearted father?

there's no logical reason for the umbers to be involved AT ALL unless sansa's involved whether they have rickon or not. none. that's the point.

and were not talking about the books. we're talking about the show.

I never said she wasn't going to go north, I pointed out that there are alternatives. It's you who won't concede that you might be wrong.

Logic? They have the heir to the North and their hated enemies are going to be vulnerable. There's plenty of logic in taking that chance to collectively stab the Boltons in the back and then rule the North through a young boy who owns them loyalty, it's how one plays the game.
 
I never said she wasn't going to go north, I pointed out that there are alternatives. It's you who won't concede that you might be wrong.
i never said i couldn't be wrong. the alternative is just stupid. and you love to complain about people making assumptions for you, then you turn around and do the same. so stop being a ****.

Logic? They have the heir to the North and their hated enemies are going to be vulnerable. There's plenty of logic in taking that chance to collectively stab the Boltons in the back and then rule the North through a young boy who owns them loyalty, it's how one plays the game.
disregard the fact that those enemies have allies themselves, but you want to talk about playing the game.
 
Last edited:
now now, lets not call each other *****es over a fictional story . :whatever:
 
ЯɘvlveR;32166197 said:
i never said i couldn't be wrong. the alternative is just stupid. and you love to complain about people making assumptions for you, then you turn around and do the same. so stop being a ****.

ЯɘvlveR;32166161 said:
there's no logical reason for the umbers to be involved AT ALL unless sansa's involved whether they have rickon or not. none.
.
Oh yes, you leave plenty of room for doubt there.
disregard the fact that those enemies have allies themselves, but you want to talk about playing the game.
Which allies would that be? The Lannisters? They're done, and by marrying Ramsay to Sansa they betrayed them. Karstarks? Those treacherous opportunists? But lets be real, you're calling this hypothetical stupid when all of last season was filled with characters and choices that made no sense, and you're coming off as irate and petulant in doing so. Courtesy and respect cost nothing, and they'd go a long way making you seem like less of a child.
 
Do you guys think we'll see Sean Bean in this season? I hope so, don't cast a younger actor! :p
 
I am not a professional when it comes to 'rape'.... but i believe it just happened.
 
ЯɘvlveR;32166065 said:
4chan f***ery

http://imgur.com/a/c8d6y

make of it what you will.

Neato. Looks like he can keep getting away with it.

I think 4chan also started the season four rumor about Coldhands killing the mutineers at Craster's Keep.
 
Last edited:
Neato. Looks like he can keep getting away with it.

I think 4chan also started the season four rumor about Coldhands killing the mutineers at Craster's Keep.

Hmm, reading that it all really seems to fit/make sense...but hard to say. Would be stoked if that's all accurate. Pretty freakin' awesome!
 
I would love the Riverlands plot to happen. But that Dorne plot would've easily made their role in S5 more substantial.
 
sorry guys, but this is a less than 0% chance of that being legit lol
 
I did say from the beginning that Daario would be the Harpy, but that didnt happen
 
Why's that? A lot of it seems to fit.

it seems entirely too 'fan written hope' -ish. Don't get me wrong, some of it is awesome. but i just have no faith in D&D anymore.

The wall collapsing would 'break the internet' as they said though.
 
Balon dies of a heart attack. lol.

I stopped believing the minute Stoneheart entered the "leak."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,286
Messages
22,079,296
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"