He will be a Justice League member.
I don't agree, BUT I see your point. The problem as I see it is snyder sees supes (i mean, other than boring) as so powerful he could handle problems and t things himself. His solution is to sideline him. His whole quitting and going to the mountains thing, and now death. He can't think of how to use him, other than big powerfulish displays. That's why we got the montage, nice showy displays of power, but it didnt develop the character or let him shine like a single scene would have, like the expanded senate scene even. HE CAUGHT A ROCKET! KEEP THAT IN! caring for victims? That's boring, lose it. He doesn't get a single moment and the bat got like three. That says it all to me, frankly.Anyone else feel like that it would have been better to not have Superman partake in this whole DCEU/Shared Universe idea?
I mean looking back at things now, along with seeing the potential future for the character, Superman hasn't benefited at all from being in a shared universe.
He's not going to be a Justice League member and was killed off only because Snyder wanted Batman to lead/form the JL.
If Superman were allowed to be in his own standalone trilogy like how Batman was with Nolan, then the character would actually stand a chance in being portrayed well on film.
Glad to see someone else who feels this way.I don't agree, BUT I see your point. The problem as I see it is snyder sees supes (i mean, other than boring) as so powerful he could handle problems and t things himself. His solution is to sideline him. His whole quitting and going to the mountains thing, and now death. He can't think of how to use him, other than big powerfulish displays. That's why we got the montage, nice showy displays of power, but it didnt develop the character or let him shine like a single scene would have, like the expanded senate scene even. HE CAUGHT A ROCKET! KEEP THAT IN! caring for victims? That's boring, lose it. He doesn't get a single moment and the bat got like three. That says it all to me, frankly.
We need him in someone else's hands QUICK.
I don't agree, BUT I see your point. The problem as I see it is snyder sees supes (i mean, other than boring) as so powerful he could handle problems and t things himself. His solution is to sideline him. His whole quitting and going to the mountains thing, and now death. He can't think of how to use him, other than big powerfulish displays. That's why we got the montage, nice showy displays of power, but it didnt develop the character or let him shine like a single scene would have, like the expanded senate scene even. HE CAUGHT A ROCKET! KEEP THAT IN! caring for victims? That's boring, lose it. He doesn't get a single moment and the bat got like three. That says it all to me, frankly.
We need him in someone else's hands QUICK.
Like this ? ^^
![]()
Cavill looks lot like Steve Reeves:
![]()
![]()
Steve Reeves was a semi-pro bodybuilder, and won the Amateur Athletics (AAU) Mr America. A fore-runner to Arnold Schwarzenegger really.Well that's a first, normally when I see old movies about characters who are physical or warriors they never bothered getting really big, they only bothered to get fit, this would be the first time I have seen an actor in an older movie actually get big for a role.
Steve Reeves was a semi-pro bodybuilder, and won the Amateur Athletics (AAU) Mr America. A fore-runner to Arnold Schwarzenegger really.
Yeah --during his peak years, he was the highest paid actor in Europe.Was he a big star back in the day?
Reeves later told an Italian journalist: "I turned the part down because it seemed to me impossible that the Italians could make a western. I was wrong. And Clint Eastwood was perfect for the part." Reeves also said that he had been offered the part of James Bond before Sean Connery.
Yeah --during his peak years, he was the highest paid actor in Europe.
Reeves obituary:
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2000/may/06/guardianobituaries.filmnews
In the sequel for sure (hopefully), assuming if we get one. But for the first film, he'll be more like an special guest star since it's very possible that he'll only appear for the big fight sequence and finale/montage at the end before the film ends. There wouldn't be any time for the character to join the league, especially after just coming back from the dead.
Anyone else feel like that it would have been better to not have Superman partake in this whole DCEU/Shared Universe idea?
I mean looking back at things now, along with seeing the potential future for the character, Superman hasn't benefited at all from being in a shared universe.
He's not going to be a Justice League member and was killed off only because Snyder wanted Batman to lead/form the JL.
If Superman were allowed to be in his own standalone trilogy like how Batman was with Nolan, then the character would actually stand a chance in being portrayed well on film.
Cavill looks lot like Steve Reeves:
![]()
![]()