The issue continues to be that people keep trying to boil it down to nostalgia or a dislike of "serious" movies as though there's nothing that could've legitimately been criticized. It's as much a bad faith argument as "Superman should always smile and wear red underwear!"
Folks gotta keep in mind that MoS2 wasn’t part of his arc. Unless he’s changed his mind on it all, I feel like ZSJL will be his final entry that possibly sets up some spinoffs.
I love Snyder. I’m glad we get to see him finish his DC trilogy. But I hope we get a new director and I’m pretty sure Snyder is ready to move on.
Personally I was not happy with the way Sheraz presented his article, he makes the assumption that anyone who doesn’t like the Snyder-Cavill Superman only does so cause they can’t let go of nostalgia for Chris Reeve’s Superman and that is utter bollocks.
Look I get that a vocal minority really love Snyder and his work but you all have to understand that for Superman to continue to flourish he needs a movie that appeals to the masses and Snyder's films fail with the audience and the critics while dividing the fans.
Superman needs a 'force awakens' so to speak, basically a fun, exciting - albeit vanilla - action adventure that will get the audience onboard, THEN you can go and explore the darker, more introspective aspects of the character in the sequel.
That's what many, MANY Snyder/MOS fans say when you say that you don't like MOS, where in reality they have a hard time understanding a very simple concept; many people didn't like MOS because THEY DID NOT LIKE THE FILM, it didn't work with them, simple as that.
I personally loved Henry, the suit, the cast, the smallville fight and some the story elements, but in the end I hated the movie because, in my eyes, it got Superman wrong. To me Superman is a charming, charismatic, intelligent character, that's the holly trinity of characteristics make Superman likeable, which the operative word that all creators need to strive for to make the character successful as opposed to the never ending quest to make the character relatable when he was never created to be as such and sadly to many creators and film makers making Superman mopey and emo is what makes him relatable.
Didn't Zack confirm or like something on Vero that his 5-film arc was:
Man of Steel
Batman v Superman
Justice League: Part 1
Man of Steel 2
Justice League: Part 2 ?
Brand new tea as referenced on The LightCast Podcast Live Stream just now:
According to Josh at DC Universe News, his sources indicate that Henry Cavill has indeed pitched a new Superman story to (possibly Warner Media) and they absolutely loved it. Henry's pitch could potentially be turned into a new trilogy and Zack is aware of it. Though they love it, they are sitting on it for now and will prioritize it after ZSJL in 2021.
It's gonna he be a single movie. Brainiac 5 comes to the present and shows Clark who all the threats to Earth are: Darkseid, Luthor, Bizarro, The Trickster, Ugly Bruno Manheim, Mongol, Parasite, Metallo, and more. Obviously for time fidelity reasons, he can't kill Brainiac prime, or maybe he can which thus causes the creation of Brainiac 5 1,000 years in the future, some real Terminator paradox stuff.
Superman spends the rest of the movie snapping the necks of all would be villains.
If Abram's involved, why not crib from his own work (Into Darkness reference).
That's what many, MANY Snyder/MOS fans say when you say that you don't like MOS, where in reality they have a hard time understanding a very simple concept; many people didn't like MOS because THEY DID NOT LIKE THE FILM, it didn't work with them, simple as that.
I personally loved Henry, the suit, the cast, the smallville fight and some the story elements, but in the end I hated the movie because, in my eyes, it got Superman wrong. To me Superman is a charming, charismatic, intelligent character, that's the holly trinity of characteristics make Superman likeable, which the operative word that all creators need to strive for to make the character successful as opposed to the never ending quest to make the character relatable when he was never created to be as such and sadly to many creators and film makers making Superman mopey and emo is what makes him relatable.
It’s like an auto defence for the Snyder stans “well you just want Reeve” and any Superman that smiles or wears trunks is “just Reeve” to them too. They’re idiots quite frankly. It’s best to talk with the sane Snyder fans.
I think Flashpoint was part of that 5-film arc and not MOS 2.
It actually lines up with what @Superchan said about Henry’s contract. But as with everything I’m taking with a pinch of salt for now.
I’m a Snyder fan and I will never not be on team pro-trunks, baybeeee!
That's exactly what I thought of as well. @Superchan said Henry signed on for 5 films that included solos with the 5th being an option film. This lines up. If by some awesome miracle Henry does get a new trilogy (omg my nipples are ready) and if he is going to indeed be apart of Shazam: Fury of The Gods and Black Adam; Black Adam 2, there's your 5 film contract with his potential option film that he already had that has been reported forever being Flashpoint? Interesting source nonetheless.
Knowing Henry, if this source is true (and we all know Henry can talk Superman and the character flows off his tongue like hot butter) then I wonder if any elements of his pitch included his McQuarrie material? New regime, new ears.
I'm skeptical of any internet blogger rumor. It's good to have fun with these rumors to help time pass but I don't count on any of them anymore.
I still think the most likely scenario involves Abrams in one way or another.
I'm skeptical of any internet blogger rumor. It's good to have fun with these rumors to help time pass but I don't count on any of them anymore.
I still think the most likely scenario involves Abrams in one way or another.