So, there no difference between Superman and Flash ?
They're the same and different in many ways.
So, there no difference between Superman and Flash ?
But it makes perfect sense for you that he just does it to scare him. Because, why? you said he's no threat to anyone. I mean logically what y you're saying makes no sense. If he isn't trying to kill him, then why would he smash him through the wall? It's happening way too fast for the guy to know what's happening, so how could it be scary? He's not a killer, just illogical and petty. Well, I guess it's a step up from killer at least.
He's talking about the first scene with Superman, where he saves Lois, and plows through that wall while holding that terrorist.
Even though he says in the movie "I didn't kill those men.'
Funny, in my viewings it's his very first scene
He smashed him through numerous brick walls. That guy is dead unless we want to bend over backwards and give this Superman the benefit of the doubt. Need I remind you that this is a Superman who has killed before and, for all we know, will kill again if need be. That smile he gets on his face right before he finishes the guy off says a lot.
And for the record Superman doesn't later say to Lois, "I didn't kill anyone", he says, "I didn't kill those people". Who "those people" are is pretty ambiguous and muddied as that whole scene doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. I've asked numerous people to explain it to me and no one has.
But if Supes killed the warlord, why wouldn't he kill Lex after Lex nearly murdered Lois? And why wouldn't he let DD kill Lex later?
And why wouldn't he immediately kill Bats to save his mother??
Plus, if he felt bloodlust over killing that warlord, why would we go to the senate hearing?
I swear, it's like people done lost their minds over this film. They're reading it in a way that makes zero sense just to bash it.
Which is dumb--there's other, legitimate criticisms.
For anyone who's concerned about Henry not being in the Justice League movie, he confirms it on Jimmy Kimmel's show:
[YT]rho-OdAxvV8[/YT]
There're quite a few of that in MOS actually. In fact it's that confident & commanding Superman that made me interested in the character in the first place. Before MOS Superman's just a boring character to me.This.
In MOS, I forgave the lack of proactive actions because it was his first day as Superman. In BvS, I wanted to see more growth than what we got. It would have made complete sense in this narrative. Even in MOS, we saw little glimpses of a more commanding superman and that is almost non-existent in BvS.
I'm I the only one okay with Superman still learning how to be a hero? It makes sense to me that all the meta-humans (and Batman) can finally reach their potential when they come together as a team.
It's not. But I the way Supes fights and uses his powers (and his character) in BvS hasn't changed since MoS.
I'm talking about how he saves Lois in Africa, it's exactly what he would have done two years ago.
I was expecting a fun moment involving Heat Vision and the gun, or a super speed dash to behind the guy... But nope, wall smash.
Thank you! That's what I'm saying. Man of Steel Superman would just smash through the roof and again, smash the guy through a wall.
Would've been amazing to see him super speed and grab the gun.
Agree with this. They should have shown his power with more creativity and flexibility. Superman's power shouldn't be all about destruction and brutality and smash and bang and boom.It's not. But I the way Supes fights and uses his powers (and his character) in BvS hasn't changed since MoS.